Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Anthem and Cigna, the nation’s second and third largest medical health insurance carriers, have agreed to merge. They propose to create the single largest seller of medical healthcare coverage to large commercial accounts, in a market in which there are only four national carriers still sta

MILLETT, Circuit Judge, concurring: I join the opinion of the court in full, including its two separate and independent holdings that the proposed merger would substantially reduce competition in (i) the national-accounts market and (ii) the large-group-employer market in Richmond. Indeed, as to the latter holding, all of Anthem’s and the dissenting opinion’s Sturm, und Drang over efficienci

799 F.Supp.2d 910 (2011) Mary ORMOND, et al., On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. ANTHEM, INC. and Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., Defendant. Case No. 1:05-cv-1908-TWP-TAB. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. July 1, 2011. *912 Cari C. Laufenberg, Lynn L. Sarko

ENTRY ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment.1 This class action lawsuit arises out of the demutualization of Anthem Insur*823anee Companies, Ine. (“Anthem”), a transaction which involved two ste

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION .. .8 BACKGROUND.. .9 I. The Parties and Proposed Merger... 9 II. Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage.. .11 III. The Public Exchanges... 16 IV. Procedural History...

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Robert D. MacGill CONTINENTAL CASUALTY TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE Charles P. Edwards COMPANY COMPANY Christian P. Jones Stephen J. Peters James W. Riley, Jr. Mark D. Crandley David I. Rubin Riley Bennett & Egloff, LLP Barnes & Thornburg LLP Plunkett Cooney, P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-0481 (CJN) UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED and CHANGE HEALTHCARE, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The United States, joined by New York and Minnesota (collectively, “the Government

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Robert D. MacGill CONTINENTAL CASUALTY TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE Charles P. Edwards COMPANY COMPANY Christian P. Jones Stephen J. Peters James W. Riley, Jr. Mark D. Crandley David I. Rubin Riley Bennett & Egloff, LLP Barnes & Thornburg LLP Plunkett Cooney

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JERRY BEEMAN AND PHARMACY No. 07-56692 SERVICES, INC., doing business as Beemans Pharmacy; ANTHONY D.C. No. HUTCHINSON AND ROCIDA INC., CV-04-00407- doing business as Finleys Rexall VAP Drug; CHARLES MILLER, doing business as Yucaipai Valley Pharmacy; JIM MORISOLI AND AMERICAN SURGICAL PHARMACY INC., doing business as American Surgical Phar

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Colin Lindsay, Magistrate Judge, United States District Court This matter is before the Court on a motion for discovery (“Motion for “Discovery”) (DN 14) filed by Plaintiff Nicole Myers (“Myers”). The Motion for Discovery has been extensively briefed by both parties. Among several related filings is a motion to strike (DN 36) filed by Defendant Anthem Life Insurance Company (“

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JERRY BEEMAN AND PHARMACY  SERVICES, INC., doing business as Beemans Pharmacy; ANTHONY HUTCHINSON AND ROCIDA INC., doing business as Finleys Rexall Drug; CHARLES MILLER, doing business as Yucaipai Valley Pharmacy; JIM MORISOLI AND AMERICAN SURGICAL PHARMACY INC., doing business as American Surgical Pharmacy; BILL PEARSON AND PEARSON AND HOUSE, on behalf of themselves and all others

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JERRY BEEMAN AND PHARMACY  SERVICES, INC., doing business as Beemans Pharmacy; ANTHONY HUTCHINSON AND ROCIDA INC., doing business as Finleys Rexall Drug; CHARLES MILLER, doing business as Yucaipai Valley Pharmacy; JIM MORISOLI AND AMERICAN SURGICAL PHARMACY INC., doing business as American Surgical Pharmacy; BILL PEARSON AND PEARSON AND HOUSE, on behalf of themselves and all others s

CORRIGAN, J., Concurring and Dissenting.—I agree with the majority that Civil Code section 2527 (hereafter section 2527, the statute, or the provision) implicates the right of free speech under article I, section 2, subdivision (a) of our state Constitution (article I), which provides: “Every person may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the

ORDER Appellants’ request to modify the counsel listing in the Appendix to the Court’s June 6, 2012 Order is GRANTED. The order filed June 6, 2012 is amended by deleting the current Appendix and adding a new Appendix as follows: APPENDIX Counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellees Michael A. Bowse

*842MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge Before the Court are Class Counsel’s petition for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses [613], Schreiber Foods, Inc.’s (“Schreiber”) sealed motion for Rule 11 sanctions [676], and Schreiber’s amended bill of costs [694]. Ancillary to these motions ar

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge, dissenting: It has been more than seven decades since the Supreme Court ended the “mischievous” regime of Swift v. Tyson, 41 U.S. 1, 16 Pet. 1, 10 L.Ed. 865 (1842), in which federal courts sitting in diversity disregarded state court decisions and independently determined the meaning of state law. Erie Railroad, Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 74, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed.

Rogers, Circuit Judge: *1031 On October 22, 2016, AT&T Inc. announced a proposed merger with Time Warner Inc. The government sued to enjoin this vertical merger under Section 7 of the Clayton Act,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DlSTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Case No. 17-2511 (RJL) AT&T INC., et al., § Defendants. § F I L E D h/_ JUN 1 2 2018 MEMORAND_UM OPINION @9.'3§‘§ ?t?ili‘%‘l鑧l§§?'é’§ll¥l§¥a (June LZ, 2018) If there ever were an antitrust case where the parties had a dramatically different assessment of the current state of the relevant market and a fundamentally different vision of its future development, this is the one. Small

OPINION ROBINSON, Senior District Judge I. INTRODUCTION The Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (the “government”), seeks to enjoin Rockwell Holdco, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Energy Solutions, Inc. (“Energy Solutions”) from acquiring Andrews County Holding, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Waste Control Specialists LLC (‘WCS,” and collectively with the other defend

661 F.3d 1199 (2011) Jerry BEEMAN and Pharmacy Services, Inc., doing business as Beemans Pharmacy; Anthony Hutchinson and Rocida Inc., doing business as Finleys Rexall Drug; Charles Miller, doing business as Yucaipai Valley Pharmacy; Jim Morisoli and American Surgical Pharmacy Inc., doing business as American Surgical Pharmacy; Bill Pearson and Pearson and House, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general publi