Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States of America v. J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.”
Williams v. J-M Manufacturing Companypublic domain
Filed 5/22/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO NATHAN K. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff and Respondent, A162561, A163492 v. J-M MANUFACTURING (Alameda County COMPANY, INC., Super. Ct. No. RG19032329) Defendant and
Aristocraft of America, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION and ORDER Gordon, Judge: This action involves the sixth administrative review conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) of the antidumping duty order covering steel wire garment hangers from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). See Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the PRC, 80 Fed. Reg. 69,9
John Hendrix v. J-M Manufacturing Co., Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN HENDRIX, Relator; ex rel. No. 21-56276 United States of America, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 5:06-cv-00055- GW-PJW STATE OF NEVADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, OPINION THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, CALLEGUAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT; PALMDALE WATER D
NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United Statespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER STANCEU, Chief Judge: Plaintiffs (collectively, “NTN”) 1 contest the final determination (“Final Results”) issued by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the “Department”), to conclude a set of administrative reviews of a
Wirtgen America, Inc. v. United States of Americapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-cv-195 (CRC) UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Wirtgen America, Inc. distributes road-construction equipment manufactured by its German parent company. Las
Valeo North America, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 24-1189 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 08/12/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VALEO NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, ALERIS ROLLED PRODUCTS, INC., ARCONIC CO., COMMONWEALTH ROLLED PRODUCTS INC., CONSTELLIUM ROLLED PRODUCTS RAVENSWOOD, LLC, JUPITER ALUMINUM CO., JW ALUMINUM COMPANY, NOVELIS CORP
Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc.public domain
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. Today, we consider the circumstances under which a product produced pursuant to the claims of a. product-by-process patent is “on sale” under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). This is important because, if “on sale” more than one year before the filing of an application for a patent on the governing claims, any issued patent is invalid and the right to exclude other
Oracle America, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
Case: 19-2326 Document: 82 Page: 1 Filed: 09/02/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2019-2326 ______________________ Appeal from the Unite
NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United Statespublic domain
248 F.Supp.2d 1256 (2003) NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN Bower, Inc. and NTN Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and THE Timken Company, Defendant-Intervenor. SLIP OP. 03-08. Court No. 98-12-03232. United States Court of International Trade. January 24, 2003.
United States of America v. Anthem, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Anthem and Cigna, the nation’s second and third largest medical health insurance carriers, have agreed to merge. They propose to create the single largest seller of medical healthcare coverage to large commercial accounts, in a market in which there are only four national carriers still sta
NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United Statespublic domain
MAYER, Chief Judge. NTN Bearing Corporation of America, et al. appeal the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade affirming the Department of Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Sept. 5, 2000), with respect to Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore[,] Sweden and the
Oracle America, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1880C (Filed: July 19, 2019) (Re-Filed: July 26, 2019) 1 ************************** ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, Pre-award bid protest; 10 v. U.S.C. § 2304a(d)(3)-(4) (20
United States of America v. Aetna Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION .. .8 BACKGROUND.. .9 I. The Parties and Proposed Merger... 9 II. Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage.. .11 III. The Public Exchanges... 16 IV. Procedural History...
United States of America v. Google LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,
NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United Statespublic domain
132 F.Supp.2d 1102 (2001) NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NTN Corporation, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN Driveshaft, Inc. and NTN-Bower Corporation; NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation; Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A., Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Torrington Company, Defendant-Intervenor and Plaintiff. Slip Op. 01-16. Court N
NEYMAN, J. *579 In this case we consider whether the Internet domain name "OrderMyOil.com" is entitled to trademark protection under Massachusetts common law. On the complaint before us, we hold that OrderMyOil.com is a generic name that is ineligible for such protection. Accordingly, this c
NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United Statespublic domain
104 F.Supp.2d 110 (2000) NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NTN Corporation, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN Driveshaft, Inc. and NTN-Bower Corporation; NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation; Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A., Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Torrington Company, Defendant-Intervenor and Plaintiff. Slip Op. 00-64, No. 97-1
NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United Statespublic domain
83 F.Supp.2d 1281 (1999) NTN BEARING CORP. OF AMERICA, NTN Corporation, American NTN Bearing Mfg. Corp., NTN Driveshaft, Inc. and NTN-Bower Corporation, Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A.; NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation, Defendant-Intervenors, The Torrington Company, Defendant-Intervenor and Plaintiff. No. 97-01-00092. Slip Op. 99-71.</
Timken Company v. United Statespublic domain
209 F.Supp.2d 1373 (2002) The TIMKEN COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A.; NTN Bearing Corporation of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN Bower, Inc. and NTN Corporation, Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 02-54. Court No. 98-12-03237. United States Court of International Trade. June 5
United States of America v. Google LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,