⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States of America v. J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.”

California Court of Appeal · 2024-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/22/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO NATHAN K. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff and Respondent, A162561, A163492 v. J-M MANUFACTURING (Alameda County COMPANY, INC., Super. Ct. No. RG19032329) Defendant and
United States Court of International Trade · 2017-09-28 · Published · cited 11× · 2017 CIT 132; 269 F. Supp. 3d 1316
OPINION and ORDER Gordon, Judge: This action involves the sixth administrative review conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) of the antidumping duty order covering steel wire garment hangers from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). See Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the PRC, 80 Fed. Reg. 69,9
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-08-08 · Published · cited 0× · 76 F.4th 1164
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOHN HENDRIX, Relator; ex rel. No. 21-56276 United States of America, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 5:06-cv-00055- GW-PJW STATE OF NEVADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, OPINION THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, CALLEGUAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT; PALMDALE WATER D
United States Court of International Trade · 2015-02-03 · Published · cited 0× · 2015 CIT 12; 46 F. Supp. 3d 1375; 36 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1702; 2015 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 11; 2015 WL 427205
OPINION AND ORDER STANCEU, Chief Judge: Plaintiffs (collectively, “NTN”) 1 contest the final determination (“Final Results”) issued by the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the “Department”), to conclude a set of administrative reviews of a
District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-03-11 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 20-cv-195 (CRC) UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Wirtgen America, Inc. distributes road-construction equipment manufactured by its German parent company. Las
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025-08-12 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 24-1189 Document: 61 Page: 1 Filed: 08/12/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VALEO NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, ALERIS ROLLED PRODUCTS, INC., ARCONIC CO., COMMONWEALTH ROLLED PRODUCTS INC., CONSTELLIUM ROLLED PRODUCTS RAVENSWOOD, LLC, JUPITER ALUMINUM CO., JW ALUMINUM COMPANY, NOVELIS CORP
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-07-11 · Published · cited 37× · 827 F.3d 1363; 119 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1329; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12667; 2016 WL 3670000
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge. Today, we consider the circumstances under which a product produced pursuant to the claims of a. product-by-process patent is “on sale” under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). This is important because, if “on sale” more than one year before the filing of an application for a patent on the governing claims, any issued patent is invalid and the right to exclude other
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020-09-02 · Published · cited 34× · 975 F.3d 1279
Case: 19-2326 Document: 82 Page: 1 Filed: 09/02/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2019-2326 ______________________ Appeal from the Unite
United States Court of International Trade · 2003-01-24 · Published · cited 8× · 248 F. Supp. 2d 1256; 27 Ct. Int'l Trade 129; 27 C.I.T. 129; 25 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1133; 2003 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 8
248 F.Supp.2d 1256 (2003) NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN Bower, Inc. and NTN Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and THE Timken Company, Defendant-Intervenor. SLIP OP. 03-08. Court No. 98-12-03232. United States Court of International Trade. January 24, 2003.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-02-21 · Published · cited 17× · 236 F. Supp. 3d 171; 2017 WL 685563
MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Anthem and Cigna, the nation’s second and third largest medical health insurance carriers, have agreed to merge. They propose to create the single largest seller of medical healthcare coverage to large commercial accounts, in a market in which there are only four national carriers still sta
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002-06-28 · Published · cited 0× · 295 F.3d 1263; 2002 WL 1397118
MAYER, Chief Judge. NTN Bearing Corporation of America, et al. appeal the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade affirming the Department of Commerce’s Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Sept. 5, 2000), with respect to Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore[,] Sweden and the
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2019-07-26 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1880C (Filed: July 19, 2019) (Re-Filed: July 26, 2019) 1 ************************** ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, Pre-award bid protest; 10 v. U.S.C. § 2304a(d)(3)-(4) (20
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-01-23 · Published · cited 26× · 240 F. Supp. 3d 1; 2017 WL 325189; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8490
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION .. .8 BACKGROUND.. .9 I. The Parties and Proposed Merger... 9 II. Original Medicare and Medicare Advantage.. .11 III. The Public Exchanges... 16 IV. Procedural History...
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-09-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,
United States Court of International Trade · 2001-02-23 · Published · cited 13× · 132 F. Supp. 2d 1102; 25 Ct. Int'l Trade 118; 25 C.I.T. 118; 23 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1067; 2001 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 21
132 F.Supp.2d 1102 (2001) NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NTN Corporation, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN Driveshaft, Inc. and NTN-Bower Corporation; NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation; Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A., Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Torrington Company, Defendant-Intervenor and Plaintiff. Slip Op. 01-16. Court N
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2019-07-12 · Published · cited 11× · 129 N.E.3d 856; 95 Mass. App. Ct. 579
NEYMAN, J. *579 In this case we consider whether the Internet domain name "OrderMyOil.com" is entitled to trademark protection under Massachusetts common law. On the complaint before us, we hold that OrderMyOil.com is a generic name that is ineligible for such protection. Accordingly, this c
United States Court of International Trade · 2000-06-05 · Published · cited 39× · 104 F. Supp. 2d 110; 24 Ct. Int'l Trade 385; 24 C.I.T. 385; 2000 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 67
104 F.Supp.2d 110 (2000) NTN BEARING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, NTN Corporation, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN Driveshaft, Inc. and NTN-Bower Corporation; NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation; Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A., Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Torrington Company, Defendant-Intervenor and Plaintiff. Slip Op. 00-64, No. 97-1
United States Court of International Trade · 1999-10-22 · Published · cited 7× · 83 F. Supp. 2d 1281; 23 Ct. Int'l Trade 486
83 F.Supp.2d 1281 (1999) NTN BEARING CORP. OF AMERICA, NTN Corporation, American NTN Bearing Mfg. Corp., NTN Driveshaft, Inc. and NTN-Bower Corporation, Plaintiffs and Defendant-Intervenors, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A.; NSK Ltd. and NSK Corporation, Defendant-Intervenors, The Torrington Company, Defendant-Intervenor and Plaintiff. No. 97-01-00092. Slip Op. 99-71.</
United States Court of International Trade · 2002-06-05 · Published · cited 5× · 209 F. Supp. 2d 1373; 26 Ct. Int'l Trade 590; 26 C.I.T. 590; 24 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1596; 2002 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 54
209 F.Supp.2d 1373 (2002) The TIMKEN COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A.; NTN Bearing Corporation of America, American NTN Bearing Manufacturing Corporation, NTN Bower, Inc. and NTN Corporation, Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 02-54. Court No. 98-12-03237. United States Court of International Trade. June 5
District Court, District of Columbia · 2023-08-04 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,