Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States of America v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.”
Skot Heckman v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SKOT HECKMAN; LUIS PONCE; No. 23-55770 JEANENE POPP; JACOB ROBERTS, on behalf of themselves D.C. No. 2:22-cv- and all those similarly situated, 00047-GW-GJS Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; TICKETMASTER, LLC, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal
Skot Heckman v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SKOT HECKMAN; LUIS PONCE; No. 23-55770 JEANENE POPP; JACOB ROBERTS, on behalf of themselves D.C. No. 2:22-cv- and all those similarly situated, 00047-GW-GJS Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC.; TICKETMASTER, LLC, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal
Batson v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.public domain
WOOD, Chief Judge. James Batson walked up to Live Nation’s box office at the Charter One Pavilion in Chicago and purchased a non-refundable ticket to see O.A.R., a popular American rock band. Ticket in hand, he realized that the ticket price included a $9 parking fee for a spot he did not want. Believing that the bundled $9 fee was fundamentally unfair, he sued on behalf of himself and a proposed class. I<
Bourgeois v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.public domain
WILNER, J. Before us are four questions certified to this Court by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act (Md.Code, §§ 12-601-12-613 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (CJP)). Those questions arise from a class action pending in the District Court in which the defendants are alleged to have violated Baltimore City ordinances dea
James Batson v. Live Nation, Entertainment, Inpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 13‐1560 JAMES BATSON, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. LIVE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al., Defendants‐Appellees.
It's My Party, Inc. v. Live Nation, Inc.public domain
OPINION J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge. Plaintiffs It’s My Party, Inc. (“IMP”) and It’s My Amphitheater, Inc. (“IMA”) (collectively “plaintiffs”) bring this lawsuit against Live Nation, Inc. (“Live Nation”) under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2; and the Maryland Antitrust Act, Md.Code Ann. §§ 11-201, 204 et seq. Plaintiffs allege that Live Nation has unreasona
Abs Entertainment, Inc. v. CBS Corp.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ABS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., an No. 16-55917 Arkansas corporation; BARNABY RECORDS, INC., a New York D.C. No. corporation; BRUNSWICK RECORD 2:15-cv-06257- CORPORATION, a New York PA-AGR corporation; MALACO INC., a Mississippi corporation, each individually and on behalf of all ORDER AND others similarly situated., A
PENN Entertainment, Inc. (f/k/a Penn National Gaming, Inc.) v. Department Of State Revenuepublic domain
ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER: ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT: MARK J. RICHARDS THEODORE E. ROKITA MATTHEW J. EHINGER ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA JOSHUA W. SCHLAKE LYDIA A. GOLTEN ICE MILLER LLP THOMAS L. MARTINDALE Indianapolis, IN J. DEREK ATWOOD DEPUTY ATTORNEYS GENERAL
Abs Entertainment, Inc. v. CBS Corp.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ABS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., an No. 16-55917 Arkansas corporation; BARNABY RECORDS, INC., a New York D.C. No. corporation; BRUNSWICK RECORD 2:15-cv-06257- CORPORATION, a New York PA-AGR corporation; MALACO INC., a Mississippi corporation, each individually and on behalf of all OPINION others similarly situated.,
Pierce v. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.public domain
ORDER LESLIE J. ABRAMS, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to .Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. 6) and Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 12). For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs Motion to Amend (Doc. 12). is DENIED. *1377
Chang v. United States of Americapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) WEIH STEVE CHANG, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 22-352 (RBW) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) et al.,
Jones v. Starz Entertainment, LLCpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KIANA JONES, No. 24-1645 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:24-cv-00206- KK-DTB v. STARZ ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, OPINION Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court
United States v. AMC Entertainment, Inc.public domain
245 F.Supp.2d 1094 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMC ENTERTAINMENT, INC., American Multi-Cinema, Inc. Defendants. No. CV 99-01034FMC(SHX). United States District Court, CD. California. January 22, 2003. Leon W. Weidman, Michele C. Marchand, Suzanne L. Bell, AUSA, Office of U.S. Atty., Civ. Div., Los Angeles, CA, Bill Lann Lee, John L. Wodatch, U.S.
Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.public domain
782 F.Supp.2d 911 (2011) MATTEL, INC., v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011. *940 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, John B. Quinn, Randa A.F. Osman, Rory S. Mille
United States v. AMC Entertainment, Inc.public domain
232 F.Supp.2d 1092 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMC ENTERTAINMENT, INC., American Multi-Cinema, Inc. Defendants. No. CV 99-01034 FMC(SHX). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 20, 2002. *1093 Leon W. Weidman, Michele C. Marchand, Suzanne L. Bell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Office of U.S. Attorney Civil
WILKINS, Circuit Judge: The Highway Beautification Act (“HBA”), 23 U.S.C. §131, requires the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”) and each state to develop and implement individual federal-state agreements (“FSAs”), detailing, among other things, “size, lighting and spacing” standards for the billboards now found towering over many of our country’s interstate highways. One of t
Castanon v. United States of Americapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANGELICA CASTAÑON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 18-2545 Three-Judge Court UNITED STATES, et al., (RDM, RLW, TNM) Defendants. Before: WILKINS, Circuit
Castanon v. United States of Americapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANGELICA CASTAÑON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 18-2545 Three-Judge Court UNITED STATES, et al., (RDM, RLW, TNM) Defendants. Before: WILKINS, Circuit
POST-TRIAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SHELLEY C. CHAPMAN, Bankruptcy Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS PARTIES AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.619 FINDINGS OF FACT.621 I. Background.622 A. The Licensor Parties and the Yu-Gi-Oh! Brand.622 B. The Yu-Gi-Oh! License Agreements.622 1. The Short Form Agreem
ANITA GREEN V. MISS UNITED STATES OF AMERICApublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 2 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANITA NOELLE GREEN, No. 21-35228 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-02048