Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “United States of America v. Phillips (Priolo)”

United States v. Novis (Denkberg)public domain

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025-06-02 · Published · cited 2× · 139 F.4th 147

23-6877-cr United States v. Novis (Denkberg) In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2024 Nos. 23-6877 (L), 23-6925 (CON) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. GARY DENKBERG, SEAN NOVIS

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

City of Austin v. Casiraghipublic domain

Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983-06-29 · Published · cited 18× · 656 S.W.2d 576; 1983 Tex. App. LEXIS 4784

656 S.W.2d 576 (1983) CITY OF AUSTIN, Appellant, v. Arturo CASIRAGHI, et al., Appellees. No. 13532. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. June 29, 1983. Rehearing Denied September 7, 1983. *578 Jerry L. Harris, City Atty., James R. Riggs, Asst. City Atty., Austin, for appellant. Robert Norris, Jones & Nor

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →

LaRoss Partners, LLC v. Contact 911 Inc.public domain

District Court, E.D. New York · 2012-07-10 · Published · cited 39× · 874 F. Supp. 2d 147; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96137; 2012 WL 2856099

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiff LaRoss Partners, LLC (“LaRoss”) commenced this action against Contact 911 Inc., (“Contact”) and FamilyContact911.com LLC (“Family”) based on claims of breach of contract, unjust enrichment, fraud, and conversion. The Defendants now move to dismiss the Plaintiffs amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: Contact 911 Inc. → · find the judge →

Howard Fuel v. Lloyd's Underwriterspublic domain

District Court, S.D. New York · 1984-06-11 · Published · cited 12× · 588 F. Supp. 1103; 1985 A.M.C. 182; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16016

588 F.Supp. 1103 (1984) HOWARD FUEL, Plaintiff, v. LLOYD'S UNDERWRITERS, et al., Respondent. No. 80 Civ. 654 (JES). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 11, 1984. *1104 Dickerson, Reilly & Mullen, New York City, for plaintiff; Robert W. Mullen, New York City, of counsel. Hill, Rivkins, Carey, Loesburg, O'B

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →