Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. $317,670.78 in funds”
Platinum Services, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-456C (Filed: July 25, 2025) ************************** PLATINUM SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ************************** Anthony J. Marchese, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Carol L. O’Riordan, of counsel. Stephanie A. Fleming, Trial Attorney, United States Depart
Hardy v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-388L (Filed: December 14, 2018) ************************************* WILLIAM C. HARDY & BERTIE ANN * HARDY et al., * * Rails-to-Trails; Valuation Trial; Yellow Plaintiffs, *
Hitkansut LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 12-303C (Filed: March 15, 2019) ********************************** ) HITKANSUT LLC, et al., ) Patent case; motion for award of ) attorneys’ fees and expenses pursuant to 28 Plaintiffs, ) U.S.C. § 1498(
St. Bernard Parish Government v. United Statespublic domain
Just Compensation Award For A Temporary Takings Claim, U.S. Const. Amend. V; Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 23(a) Class Action; RCFC 23(b) Class Actions Maintainable; RCFC 23(c) Class Certification Order; RCFC 23(g)(1) (Appointing Class Counsel); RCFC 54(b) Judgment Involving Multiple Parties; RCFC 56 Summary Judgment. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND PARTIAL FINAL JUDG
St. Bernard Parish Government v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 05-1119 L May 4, 2016 **************************************** * Just Compensation Award For A * Temporary Takings Claim, U.S. ST. BERNARD PARISH GOVERNMENT * CONST. Amend. V; AND OTHER OWNERS OF REAL *
Equitable Adjustment; Contract Disputes Act; Fraud Counterclaims; Special Plea in Fraud, 28 U.S.C. § 2514; False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729; CDA fraud provision, 42 U.S.C. § 7103(e)(2). OPINION Merow, Senior Judge. This litigation stems from a 2005 contract between the United States Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and Hernandez,
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
747 F.Supp.2d 49 (2010) FIDELITY INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY ADVISOR A FUND, LLC, BY the TAX MATTERS PARTNER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Fidelity High Tech Advisor a Fund, LLC, by the Tax Matters Partner, Plaintiff, v. United States of America, Defendant. Civil Nos. 05-40151-FDS, 06-40130-FDS, 06-40243-FDS, 06-40244-FDS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.
United States v. Robert McPartlinpublic domain
595 F.2d 1321 4 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 416 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert McPARTLIN et al., Defendant-Appellants. Nos. 77-2258, 77-2259, 77-2274, 77-2275 and 77-2280. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued Sept. 29, 1978.Decided March 26, 1979.As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing
United States Trustee v. Boulders on the River, Inc. (In Re Boulders on the River, Inc.)public domain
218 B.R. 528 (1997) In re BOULDERS ON THE RIVER, INC., Debtor. UNITED STATES TRUSTEE, Appellant, v. BOULDERS ON THE RIVER, INC., Appellee. Civ. No. 97-6138-HO, Bankruptcy No. 692-64208-AER11. United States District Court, D. Oregon. December 18, 1997. *529 *530 Wilson C. Muhlheim, Muhlheim
International Harvester Co. v. United Statespublic domain
Durpee, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This is an action to recover $1,180,375.20 deducted by defendant from a total of $17,307,183.07 which plaintiff was entitled to receive under a contract1 for the manufacture of *823military vehicles for defendant. Defendant has asserted affirmative defenses and counterclai
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE MARILYN ABRAMS LIVING TRUST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12829-VCL ) POPE INVESTMENTS LLC, POPE ) INVESTMENTS II, LLC, and CHINA ALARM ) HOLDINGS ACQUISITION LLC, )
State v. Tobinpublic domain
Armstrong, J. ¶1 Douglas John Martin Tobin appeals the superior court’s restitution order against him for stealing crabs and geoducks from the state of Washington and Native American Tribes. He argues that (1) the declarations the expert used to estimate damages failed to meet the requirements of RCW 9A.72.085, (2) the expert did not assess damages with reasonable certainty, (3) the investigative and administrative costs the cou
393 B.R. 752 (2008) In re Laterrya MOULTON, Debtor. Laterrya Moulton, Plaintiff, v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 07-03837-BGC-13. Adversary No. 08-00032-BGC. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. September 15, 2008. *755 Leotis Williams, Birmingham, AL, for Plainti
Farm Service Agency v. Jackson (In Re Jackson)public domain
456 B.R. 478 (2011) In re Jody Clyde JACKSON and Eileen Frances Jackson, Debtors. Farm Service Agency, Plaintiff. v. Jody Clyde Jackson and Eileen Frances Jackson, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 10-61020-7. Adversary No. 10-00074. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana. May 10, 2011. *481 George F. Darragh, Jr., U.S. Attorney
State v. Tobinpublic domain
130 P.3d 426 (2006) 132 Wash.App. 161 STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Douglas John Martin TOBIN, Appellant. Nos. 31636-6-II, 31646-3-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. March 21, 2006. *428 Michelle Luna-Green, Kathleen Proctor, Pierce County Prosecuting Atty. Office, Tacoma, WA, for Respon
MeLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge: BACKGROUND In 1990, the United States contracted-with the Lockheed Corporation (“Lockheed”), for the design and manufacture of a new fighter plane, the F-22 “Raptor.” As is typical in such eases, a series of subcontracts ensued. Lockheed subcontracted the weapons bay doors to Curtiss-Wright Flight Systems, Inc. (“Curtiss-Wright”).
MEMORANDUM & ORDER KIYO A. MATSUMOTO, District Judge. Presently before the court is a motion filed by defendant and counterclaim-plaintiff Schlesinger Electrical Contractors, Inc. (“SEC” or “defendant”) seeking summary judgment on its first through fifth counterclaims against plaintiffs and counterclaim-defendants First Keystone Consultants, Inc. (“FKC”), Robert H. Solomon and Jane Solomon
Chamberlain v. Reddy Ice Holdings, Inc.public domain
757 F.Supp.2d 683 (2010) John CHAMBERLAIN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. REDDY ICE HOLDINGS, INC., William P. Brick, Jimmy C. Weaver, Steven J. Janusek and Raymond D. Booth, Defendants. Case No. 08-cv-13451. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. December 6, 2010. *6
ClearOne Communications,Inc. v. Yangpublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit June 27, 2011 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNI