Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. 1160 Walker Avenue”
United States v. Jonespublic domain
McHUGH, Circuit Judge. *933 Mr. Arnold Jones is a Native American who pleaded guilty to child abuse for driving on a reservation while intoxicated with his minor son in the car. He entered a guilty plea both before a tribal court and, after serving his tribal sentence, before a federal distr
Menendez v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-1624L; No. 17-1931L Filed: October 30, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * REINALDO CASTILLO, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * v. *
Menendez v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-1624L; No. 17-1931L Filed: June 29, 2018 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * REINALDO CASTILLO, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * Motion for Partial Summary v. * Judgment; Takings Claim;
State v. United Statespublic domain
Reed O'Connor, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is about the lawfulness of a tax in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("ACA") and of a regulation that the United States Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") uses to implement it. The ACA imposed a tax on medical providers but exempted the states from paying it. Notwithstanding Congress's direction in the ACA, the HHS regulation effectively requires the st
United States v. Kaboni Savagepublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 14-9003 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KABONI SAVAGE, a/k/a Joseph Amill, a/k/a Bonnie, a/k/a Yusef Billa, agent of Dirt, agent of Bighead,
United States v. Raymont Wrightpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 17-1972 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. RAYMONT WRIGHT ______________ ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (D.C. No. 2-1
United States v. Raymont Wrightpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 17-1972 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. RAYMONT WRIGHT ______________ ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (D.C. No. 2-1
United States v. Raymont Wrightpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 17-1972 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant v. RAYMONT WRIGHT ______________ ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA (D.C. No. 2-1
United States v. Burwellpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On July 15, 2005, Bryan Burwell (“Bur-well”) was convicted by a jury in this Court of: conspiracy to conduct and participate, directly and indirectly, in the affairs of an enterprise, through a pattern of racketeering activity (“Count I”), including the armed robbery of the Industrial Bank
United States v. Turnerpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER RAMOS, District Judge. On January 28, 2014, a grand jury returned an indictment charging Kowan Turner with being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The charge arose from a December 11, 2013 home visit conducted by officers of the New York Police Department’s 46th Precinct in connection with a reported domestic violence incident. After a sequ
Honken v. United Statespublic domain
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT CONVICTIONS AND SENTENCES LINDA R. READE, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................962 II. BACKGROUND.........................................................962 A. Underlying Criminal Proceedings....................................962
United States v. Ramirez-Riverapublic domain
THOMPSON, Circuit Judge. After a jury convicted Defendants-Appellants José Laureano-Salgado, Pedro Ramirez-Rivera, and Ismael Cruz-Ramos (collectively, “the Defendants”) 1 of *12 numerous drug and gun crimes, a district court judge sentenced t
United States v. Goochpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge. I. SYNOPSIS This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Sterling Yazmin Long-Payton’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of an Unlawful Search and Seizure with Accompanying Citation of Authority (hereinafter Defendant Payton’s “Motion to Suppress”) (Doc. No. 28) and Defendant Charles J. Gooch, Jr.’s
Velasquez v. United States Postal Servicepublic domain
*221MEMORANDUM, ORDER AND JUDGEMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior United States District Judge Table of Contents I. Introduction .. .221 II. Findings of Fact.. .221 A. Accident .. .221 B. Injury... 226 III. Findings of Law .. .227 A. New Yo
Collins v. United Statespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. The key issue for decision is whether a statute entitling active-duty servieemembers involuntarily discharged for homosexuality to separation pay and requiring
Michael D. Tann v. United Statespublic domain
PER CURIAM: After a nine-month jury trial, the six appellants in this case were convicted of conspiracy and a string of violent crimes, including homicides, that were committed in connection with their membership in a gang known as the 22nd Street Crew. They raise numerous challenges to their convictions in these consolidated appeals. With a few exceptions, however, we affirm the judgments of the Superior Court.
United States v. Stokelypublic domain
733 F.Supp.2d 868 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Beverly STOKELY, Defendant. No. 3:10-CR-24. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville. August 5, 2010. *873 Melissa M. Millican, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of U.S. Attorney, Knoxville, TN, for Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION
United States v. American Express Co.public domain
DECISION NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.149 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.152 ' I. BACKGROUND .152 A. Overview of the GPCC Card Industry.152 B. Competition and Pricing in the GPCC Card Industry.156 C. The Non-Discrimination Provisio
United States v. C.R.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I.Introduction...............................................................347 II.Facts.....................................................................349 A. Defendant’s Childhood..................................................349
Lee v. United Statespublic domain
(2008) Robert T. LEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-2184 (JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 14, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN D. BATES, District Judge. Plaintiff's Robert T. Lee[1] and Alyce Summers bring this action against the United