Cases

OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: The California State Lands Commission (the “Lands Commission”) appeals the district court’s final judgment in this eminent domain case, wherein the United States took a fee simple interest in about 32.42 acres of land (the “Property”) on behalf of the Navy, which has continuously leased this parcel since 1949. In condemni

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. Sharp Ranch Inc., appeals from two decisions of the district court. First, it contests the district court’s determination to grant a new trial after Sharp Ranch had received a jury verdict valuing ranch property condemned by the United States and severance damage to the remaining ranch property at two million dollars. Second, it contests the district court’s refusal to grant a new trial aft

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: Appellant James Starr appeals from a jury verdict awarding him $8676.80 in compensation for the condemnation of some 30.64 acres of his 215-acre tract at the mouth of the Klickitat river above the Bonneville Dam. Because we conclude that the district court committed errors of law in denying his motion for counsel and in failing to consider the propriety o

CLARK, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a denial of attorneys’ fees in a condemnation proceeding. The issues are whether the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA)1 permits a landowner to recover attorneys’ fees in condemnation cases and, if so, whether the landowner in this case is nevertheless not entitled to an award because the government’s posi

DYER, Circuit Judge: “Facts relevant to this title dispute have been developing since Jean Lafitte was appointed Governor of Galveston Island in 1819 by the Republic of Mexico.” 1 One hundred and forty years later, in 1959, the United States brought suit to remove cloud a

425 F.Supp.2d 704 (2006) UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff, v. .30 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, Located at 524 Cheek Road, Ramseur, Columbia Township, Randolph County, North Carolina, with All Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon, Defendant. No. 1:02CV175. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. April 10, 2006. *705</

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND ORDER DISMISSING NAVAJO NATION AND ALLOTMENT NUMBERS 1160 AND 1392 JAMES A. PARKER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) asks the Court to alter or *1253amend its MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HALBERT, District Judge. In this action to condemn land located within the boundaries of Yosemite National Park, for the use and development of the park, plaintiff United States of America seeks a protective order under Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure prohibiting the taking of depositions from Government appointed land appraisers. The Government requests an order prohibiting inquiry into the following: (1)

HENLEY, Chief Judge. This land condemnation suit commenced by plaintiff, United States of America, is now before the Court for disposition of a controversy which has arisen between Oscar Barger and Gracie Barger, his wife, on the one hand, and Glenn Barnum and Oneita Barnum Bradford, on the other hand, as to the ownership at the time of the Government’s taking of Tract 1515.1 Since the Court will

BECK, District Judge. This cause, instituted by the State of South Dakota, involves a motion for a dismissal of a Complaint in condemnation which seeks to acquire the fee simple title of certain land situated on the Missouri River and commonly known as Farm Island. Farm Island is located behind the present site of the Big Bend Dam and Reservoir Project, the current plans and specifications for which necessitate its inundatio

HULEN, District Judge. This case is before the Court on a motion of defendant land owner to vacate the order of immediate possession heretofore made in this cause. On the 27th day of December, 1943, plaintiff filed a verified petition, seeking condemnation and immediate possession of certain land owned by the defendant. Other relief sought by the petition is not material to the present issue. Paragraph “F

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 24-CO-0162 UNITED STATES, APPELLANT, V. DAMAIRZIO M. WELLS,

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 11a0168p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER; JANN

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-683 C (Filed: August 31, 2021) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * RYAN P. SLAUGHTER, * * Plaintiff, * * v. *

Case: 22-2018 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 06/21/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HAHNENKAMM, LLC, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2022-2018, 2022-2054 ______________________ Appeals from

Case: 22-2018 Document: 47 Page: 1 Filed: 06/21/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HAHNENKAMM, LLC, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2022-2018, 2022-2054 ______________________ Appeals from

Case: 20-1188 Document: 44 Page: 1 Filed: 10/01/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ROY LYNN MCCUTCHEN, PADUCAH SHOOTER’S SUPPLY, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 16-1545L (Filed: March 23, 2021) ) FRANK PENNA and ) LISA PENNA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. )

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-932 Filed: April 22, 2025 ) KOTIS ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES,

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1246 Filed: December 7, 2020 ) FLETCHER, et al., ) Tribal Trust; Native American Trust ) Management; Tucker Act; 28 U.S.C. § Plaintiffs, ) 1491; Indian Tucker Act; 28 U.S.C. §