Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Acevedo-Avila”
United States v. Perez-Vasquezpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 18-1687 19-1750 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. NOE SALVADOR PÉREZ-VÁSQUEZ, a/k/a Crazy, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 19-1027 19-1745 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v
United States v. Sinisterrapublic domain
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 95-20498 Summary Calendar __________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, versus TOMAS VENTE SINISTERRA, Appellee. __________
United States v. Ruggieropublic domain
824 F.Supp. 379 (1993) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Louis RUGGIERO, Jr., a/k/a "Jerry," a/k/a "Lieutenant," David Cleary, a/k/a "Heavy D," a/k/a "Anthony Monti, Michael Palazzolo, Anthony Castelli, Richard Olivieri, Robert Aulicino, Jr., Derrick Augustine, a/k/a "D," James Brown, a/k/a "Justice," Robert Cherry, a/k/a "Sherry," and Keith Green, Defendants. No. S 92 CR. 811 (KC). United States
United States v. Thomaspublic domain
787 F.Supp. 663 (1992) UNITED STATES of America v. Merrick Bill THOMAS, Jr., Milton Rodriguez Valencia, and Victoriano A. Minotta. No. 6:91 CR 52. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. February 24, 1992. As Amended March 12, 1992. *664 *665
United States v. Tomas Vente Sinisterrapublic domain
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Appellee Tomas Vente Sinisterra (Sinister-ra) is the defendant in pending criminal proceedings in the district court below in which he is charged with possession with intent to distribute of five kilograms or more of cocaine. The district court granted Sinisterra’s motion to suppress approximately 200 kilogra
United States v. Jacob Acevedo Padillapublic domain
59 F.3d 177NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jacob Acevedo PADILLA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50249. United States
Acevedo v. Cook Cnty. Officers Electoral Bd.public domain
Elaine E. Bucklo, United States District Judge Plaintiffs are candidates for public office in Cook County who seek to have their names included on the ballot in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on March 20, 2018. The Illinois Election Code provides that candidates for the offices plaintiffs seek must submit a petition for nomination containing "at least the number
Mateos v. Select Energy Services, LLCpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE TO POTENTIAL OPT-IN PLAINTIFFS DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification and Notice to Potential Opt-In Plaintiffs. (Dkt. # 19.) Defendant filed a response opposing conditional certification. (Dkt. # 22.) On October 10, 2013, this Court held a hearing to discuss the mer
Electronic Frontier Foundation, Inc. v. Super. Ct.public domain
Filed 9/15/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, INC. E076778 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. CIVDS1930054) v.
Feldheim v. Financial Recovery Services, Inc.public domain
OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Felix Feldheim (“Plaintiff’) brings this putative class action against Financial Recovery Services, Inc. (“FRS” or “Defendant”), alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692, et seq. (See Am. Compl. (Dkt. No. 17).) Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss pursuant to F
Acevedo-Torres v. Municipality of Arecibopublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. Damaris Acevedo-Torres (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Municipality of Arecibo (“Defendant”), alleging sexual harassment and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and Puerto Rico Law 100 of June 30, 1959 (“Law 100”), P.R. Laws Ann. tit. 29, §§ 146 e
Pollard v. Law Office of Mandy L. Spauldingpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS STEARNS, District Judge. Plaintiff Robbie Pollard1 alleges that the Law Office of Mandy L. Spaulding (Spaulding) violated various provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et see/., by engaging in “overzealous collection tactics.” Before the court is Spaulding’
Caguas Satellite Corp. v. Echostar Satellite LLCpublic domain
824 F.Supp.2d 309 (2011) CAGUAS SATELLITE CORP., and Jose Seda Chico, Plaintiffs, v. ECHOSTAR SATELLITE LLC, Dish Network Corporation, Dish Network LLC, Jane Doe, John Doe, ABC Corporation, and XYZ Corporation, Defendants. Civil No. 11-1071(FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 8, 2011. *310 Nicolas Noguera
Roman v. Delgado Altieripublic domain
371 F.Supp.2d 7 (2005) Alcides Roman ROMAN, et als., Plaintiffs, v. Carlos DELGADO ALTIERI, et als., Defendants. No. CIV. 01-1544(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 31, 2005. *8 Claudio Aliff-Ortiz, Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Pablo Landrau-Pirazzi, Ivan M. Castro-Ortiz, Aldarondo & Lopez, Guaynabo, PR, fo
McCrea v. District of Columbiapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) NICOLE RENA MCCREA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-cv-0808 (TSC) ) DISTRICT OF
State v. Artispublic domain
Opinion BISHOP, J. The defendant, Troy Artis, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of accessory to assault in the first degree by means of a dangerous instrument in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-8 and 53a-59 (a) (1). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly denied his postverdict motion for a judgment of acquittal on the ground of ins
State v. Dreierpublic domain
76 P.3d 990 (2003) 139 Idaho 246 STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Arnold Albert DREIER, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 27717. Court of Appeals of Idaho. May 29, 2003. Review Denied September 22, 2003. *992 Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy Ap
Martinez v. City of Clovispublic domain
Filed 4/7/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DESIREE MARTINEZ, F082914 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 19CECG03855) v. CITY OF CLOVIS et al., OPINIO
People v. Contreraspublic domain
Opinion BAXTER, J. A Tulare County jury convicted George Lopez Contreras (defendant) of robbing and murdering a store owner, Saleh Bin Hassan (Hassan). Defendant was found guilty, as charged, of first degree felony murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)), 1 and of robbery (§ 211). The jury also sustained
Commonwealth v. Rogerspublic domain
Cowin, J. The defendant was convicted of the murder in the first-degree of Cristian Giambrone on the theory of felony-murder with armed robbery as the predicate felony. The defendant was also convicted of assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, to wit, a knife, arising from his attack on Henry Young.2 The case is before us on the defendant’s direct appeal from these two convictions. He claims th