Cases

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. In these appeals, we address the willful and longstanding efforts of a Puerto Rico municipality, its mayor, and its personnel director to obstruct and delay the payment of a $6.9 million jury award in a civil rights case. This is the fourth time this case has come before this court. 1

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. This complex political discrimination case was filed by eighty-two plaintiffs terminated from career employment positions with the municipality of Adjuntas in Puer-to Rico. The district court severed the plaintiffs into four groups — three groups of twenty and one group of twenty-two— and the claims of the first twenty plaintiffs are now before us on defendan

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 02-1139, 02-1340, 02-1465 LUIS A. ACEVEDO-GARCIA, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. ROBERTO VERA MONROIG, Individually and as Mayor of Adjuntas; MUNICIPALITY OF ADJUNTAS; IRMA M. GONZALEZ DELGADO, Individually and as Personnel Director of Adjuntas, Defendants, Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 02-1139, 02-1340, 02-1465 LUIS A. ACEVEDO-GARCIA, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. ROBERTO VERA MONROIG, Individually and as Mayor of Adjuntas; MUNICIPALITY OF ADJUNTAS; IRMA M. GONZALEZ DELGADO, Individually and as Personnel Director of Adjuntas, Defendants, Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 02-1139, 02-1340, 02-1465 LUIS A. ACEVEDO-GARCIA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. ROBERTO VERA MONROIG, Individually and as Mayor of Adjuntas; MUNICIPALITY OF ADJUNTAS; IRMA M. GONZALEZ DELGADO, Individually and as Personnel Director of Adjuntas, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

213 F.Supp.2d 38 (2002) Luis A. ACEVEDO-GARCIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Hon. Roberto VERA-MONROIG, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 97-2639(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 30, 2002. *39 Israel Roldán-González, Aguadilla, PR, for plaintiff. Johanna M. Emmanuelli-Huertas, Pedro Ortiz Alvarez Law Office

170 F.Supp.2d 165 (2001) Luis A. ACEVEDO GARCIA, et al., Plaintiffs v. Hon. Roberto Vera MONROIG, et al., Defendants No. 97-2639(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 25, 2001. Israel Roldan-Gonzalez, Aguadilla, PR, Miguel A. Pagan-Rivera, Hao Rey, PR, Hector L. Guzman, San Sebastian, PR, for plaintiffs. Luis V. Villares-Sarmiento, Yahaid

213 F.Supp.2d 42 (2002) Luis A. ACEVEDO GARCIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Hon. Roberto VERA-MONROIG, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. 97-2639(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 30, 2002. *43 *44 Israel Roldan-Gonzalez, Aguadilla, PR, Miguel A. Pagan-Rivera, Hato Rey, PR, Hecto

PER CURIAM. In similar, albeit unrelated cases, two Puerto Rico municipalities and certain of their officers seek stays of judgment, pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 8(a). In both cases plaintiffs complain of alleged political discrimination on the defendants’ part in dismissing and/or failure to hire them in the respective municipalities. In one case, No. 02-1529, the Municipality of Gurabo and two of its officia

296 F.3d 13 Luis A. ACEVEDO-GARCÍA, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.Hon. Roberto VERA-MONROIG, Individually and as Mayor of Adjuntas, et al., Defendants, Appellants.María E. Gómez-Candelaria, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.José A. Rivera-Rodríguez, et al., Defendants, Appellants, No. 02-1139. No. 02-1340. No. 02-1529.

170 F.Supp.2d 169 (2001) Luis A. ACEVEDO GARCIA, et al., Plaintiffs v. Hon. Roberto Vera MONROIG, et al., Defendants No. 97-2630(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 29, 2001. *170 Israel Roldan-Gonzalez, Aguadilla, PR, Miguel A. Pagan-Rivera, Hao Rey, PR, Hector L. Guzman, San Sebastian, PR, for plaintiffs.

USCA1 Opinion

*4 LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. This case requires us to consider claims of immunity from suit and liability raised by Roberto Vera-Monroig, the mayor of Adjuntas in Puerto Rico, Irma González, Adjuntas’s Director of Human Resources, and the municipality of Adjuntas in response to. a lawsuit filed by eighty-eight fo

30 F.Supp.2d 141 (1998) Luis A. ACEVEDO GARCIA, et al., Plaintiff, v. Hon. Roberto VERA MONROIG, et al., Defendant. No. Civ. 97-2639 (JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 23, 1998. *142 *143 Israel Roldan-Gonzalez, Aguadilla, PR, Miguel A. Pagan-Rivera, Hato Rey, PR, for

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR TH

649 F.Supp. 1179 (1986) UNITED STATES of America v. Victor Manuel GERENA, et al. Crim. No. H-85-50 (TEC). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. December 5, 1986. *1180 Albert S. Dabrowski, John A. Danaher III, Asst. U.S. Attys., Stanley A. Twardy, Jr., U.S. Atty., David D. Buvinger, Trial Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Har

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-155T (Filed: July 2, 2018) ************************************* ALTERNATIVE CARBON RESOURCES, * LLC, * * Plaintiff, * Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment * Pending Appeal; Hilton; Standard Hav

616 F.3d 773 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Ayman FROOK, Appellant. No. 08-3680. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: April 14, 2010. Filed: August 6, 2010. Curtis Lee Blood, argued, Collinsville, IL, for appellant. John James Ware, AUSA, argued, St. Louis, MO, for appellee. Before RILEY, Chief Judg

587 F.3d 13 (2000) Andrea J. CABRAL, Suffolk County Sheriff's Department; Suffolk County, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant, Appellee. John Porter, Sr., as Personal Representative of the Estate of Sheila Porter, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. Andrea J. Cabral, Suffolk County Sheriff's Department; Suffolk County, Defendants, Appellants. *14 Correctional Medical

*1002 OPINION & ORDER PIERAS, District Judge. The Court has before it petitioner’s motion for habeas corpus relief (docket No. 2) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, respondent’s opposition (docket No. 10), and petitioner’s reply (docket No. 14). Since the record and motions filed in this case clearly demonstrate that the petitioner