Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
9 opinions for “United States v. Agurcia”
United States v. Agurcia-Bardalespublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Josué Aaron Agurcia-Bardales appeals his 53-month sentence, imposed within the advisory Guidelines sentencing range (within-Guidelines sentence), following his guilty plea to illegal reentry into the United States after deportation. Agurcia maintains his sentence is greater than necessary to meet the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). In that regard, he contends the advisory Gui
Agurcia-Bardales v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Cruz-Paguada v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied. Same case below, 383 Fed. Appx. 852.
Cruz-Paguada v. United Statespublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
State v. Greenpublic domain
DANIEL L. DYSART, Judge. \,PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Defendants Rayshaud E. Green and Dominique Hawthorne were jointly charged by bill of information with armed robbery, La. R.S. 14:64, while armed with a gun, of Johan Agurcia. Defendants pleaded not guilty at their arraignment. The trial court denied defendants’ motions to suppress the evidence and identifications. At the end o
Montes v. Vail Clinic, Inc.public domain
497 F.3d 1160 (2007) Ana Patricia MONTES, Nely Davila, Margarita Erazo, Eva Escobedo, Ernesto Garcia, Willie Mae Hopkins, Elizabeth Jaramillo, and Mervyn D. Vargas, on behalf of themselves and all other interested and similarly situated parties, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Josefa C. Diaz, and Angelica Nunez, on behalf of themselves and all other interested and similarly situated parties, Plaintiffs, v. VAIL CLINIC, INC., Defendant-Appellee, an
Boudreaux v. Ultramar Enterprises, Inc.public domain
GRISBAUM, Judge. The defendant, Ultramar Enterprises, Inc., suspensively appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Earl Boudreaux, ordering a sheriffs sale of property subject to a mortgage held by Mr. and Mrs. Boudreaux. We affirm. Mr. and Mrs. Boudreaux are the holders of a promissory note secured by Ultramar Enterprises, Inc. payable to the order of bearer in the amount of $201,0
Sempe v. Coordinated Caribbean Transport, Inc.public domain
363 So.2d 194 (1978) Roberto SEMPE et al., Appellants, v. COORDINATED CARIBBEAN TRANSPORT, INC., et al., Appellees. No. 77-1190. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. October 17, 1978. *195 Billings, Frederick, Wooten & Honeywell and Philip H. Blackburn, Orlando, for appellants. Daniels & Hicks and S
815 F.Supp. 620 (1993) In re INTEGRATED RESOURCES REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS SECURITIES LITIGATION. MDL No. 897, No. MISC. 21-61 (RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 8, 1993. As Amended February 11, 1993. *621 *622 *623