⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Akers Drew”

United States Court of Federal Claims · 2021-08-12 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: July 6, 2021 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * KRISTINE AKERS and * MATTHEW AKERS, as parents of * PUBLISHED A.A., a minor, * * No. 15-597V Petitioners, * v. *
State v. Akerspublic domain
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010-09-27 · Published · cited 24× · 243 P.3d 757; 149 N.M. 53; 2010 NMCA 103
243 P.3d 757 (2010) 2010-NMCA-103 STATE of New Mexico, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Darrell AKERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 28,674. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. September 27, 2010. *758 Gary K. King, Attorney General, Ann M. Harvey, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee. Hugh W. Dangl
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014-04-16 · Published · cited 6× · 137 So. 3d 818; 2014 WL 1491598; 2014 La. App. LEXIS 1023
MOORE, J. liAll sides appeal the judgment in this breach of contract claim arising from a public works project to renovate the Shreveport Fire Maintenance Facility. The dispute stemmed from a subcontract to provide the vehicle exhaust system for removing CO gas from the building while fire trucks are being serviced. For the reasons expressed, we amend the judgment and affirm as amended. Factual and Pr
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2008-03-18 · Published · cited 12× · 246 S.W.3d 916; 2008 Mo. LEXIS 26; 2008 WL 713767
246 S.W.3d 916 (2008) Randolph AKERS and Kelly Akers, Respondents, v. CITY OF OAK GROVE, Missouri, Appellant. No. SC 88581. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. March 18, 2008. *918 James H. Ensz, Steven T. Majors, Robert O. Jester, Kansas City, for Appellee. William L. Carr, Kansas City, for Respondent. I.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024-08-05 · Published · cited 5× · 111 F.4th 1068
Appellate Case: 23-2010 Document: 010111089945 Date Filed: 08/05/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 5, 2024
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024-03-04 · Published · cited 4× · 94 F.4th 1130
Appellate Case: 22-7028 Document: 010111008999 Date Filed: 03/04/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 4, 2024
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-07-19 · Published · cited 3× · 109 F.4th 521
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued May 9, 2024 Decided July 19, 2024 No. 21-3081 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. CHANCE BARROW, APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:20-cr-00127-1)
Akers v. Capertonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993-06-29 · Published · cited 27× · 998 F.2d 220; 8 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 991; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 15907
998 F.2d 220 62 USLW 2029, 8 IER Cases 991 Donald Hobart AKERS, Jr.; William M. Cayton; Glen S.Hanlin; Jimmy L. Richardson; Alvin Lee Engelke;Larry Pauley, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Gaston CAPERTON, Governor, individually and in his officialcapacity as Governor of the State of West Virginia; ArtGleason, individually and in his official capacity asSecretary of the Department of Transportatio
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024-12-09 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 23-1550 Document: 65 Page: 1 Filed: 12/09/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RISEN ENERGY CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant TRINA SOLAR CO., LTD., ET AL., Plaintiffs CANADIAN SOLAR INC., CANADIAN SOLAR INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, CANADIAN SOLAR MANUFACTURING (CHANGSHU), INC., CANADIAN SOLAR MANUFACTURING (LUOYANG)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2026-02-17 · Published · cited 0×
Appellate Case: 24-2109 Document: 61-1 Date Filed: 02/17/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS February 17, 2026
Akers v. Capertonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993-06-29 · Published · cited 0× · 998 F.2d 220; 1993 WL 229425
OPINION K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge: The plaintiffs, former West Virginia County Maintenance Superintendents transferred because of their political affiliation, filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit seeking damages and equitable relief. The district court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on liability, denied the defendants’ defense of qualified immunity, and' set the case for trial to determine dama
District Court, D. Utah · 2017-05-18 · Published · cited 0× · 252 F. Supp. 3d 1269; 2017 WL 2198194; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76358
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ON RESENTENCING Clark Waddoups, United States District Judge Defendant John Eugene Walker appears before this court for resentencing following the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeal’s reversal and remand of his prior sentence. See United States v. Walker, 844 F.3d 1253 (10th Cir. 2017). BACKGROUND On December 11, 2013, Mr. Walk
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2025-09-08 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 23-2094 Document: 59 Page: 1 Filed: 09/08/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CORINTH PIPEWORKS PIPE INDUSTRY SA, CPW AMERICA CO., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, THE AMERICAN LINE PIPE PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION TRADE COMMITTEE, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2023-2094
Akers v. Hodelpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989-03-24 · Published · cited 0× · 871 F.2d 924; 1989 WL 25508
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. This case concerns the will of Victor N. Akers, a deceased Indian with both Osage and Pawnee property interests that he bequeathed to his wife and two grown chil*926dren. Because of his tribal affiliations and the nature of his holdings in Indian country, his will was subject to approval or disapproval by the Secretary of the Inte
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990-03-30 · Published · cited 53× · 572 A.2d 746; 392 Pa. Super. 170; 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 777
392 Pa. Superior Ct. 170 (1990) 572 A.2d 746 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Anna AKERS a/k/a Anna Wolfe, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 15, 1989. Filed March 30, 1990. *174 H. David Rothman, Pittsburgh, for appellant. Michael W. Streily, Asst. Dist. Atty., Pittsburgh, for
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017-08-31 · Published · cited 29× · 870 F.3d 11; 2017 WL 3770712; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 16799
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Jane E. O’Brien, a professional investment adviser, engaged in a long-running scheme to defraud several of her clients— mostly elderly women who relied on her financial advice and friendship—out of their life savings. This scheme was eventually uncovered, and she pled guilty—in two separate cases—to securities fraud, investment adviser fraud, wire fraud, and
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017-05-09 · Published · cited 3× · 856 F.3d 91; 2017 WL 1842505; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8175
PILLARD, Circuit Judge: On September 21, 2011, three men approached Hugh Whitaker, an employee of a cash-in-transit service, as he exited a CVS in Washington, D.C. One of the men drew a handgun and demanded the cash Whitaker had just picked up from the CVS. Whitaker drew his own handgun and they exchanged gunfire. Whitaker retreated into the CVS unharmed. The three other men, on
United States Court of International Trade · 2020-12-01 · Published · cited 3× · 483 F. Supp. 3d 1294; 2020 CIT 171
Slip Op. 20- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ROYAL BRUSH MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff, v. Before: Mark A. Barnett, Judge UNITED STATES, Court No. 19-00198 Defendant, and DIXON TICONDEROGA CO., Defendant-Intervenor. OPINION AND ORDER [Remandin
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2020-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-1763C (Filed: May 22, 2020) ********************************** ) THE TOLLIVER GROUP, INC., ) ) Motion for reconsideration; jurisdiction Plaintiff, ) over contractor’s claim for partial
United States Court of International Trade · 2019-07-09 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 CIT 86
Slip Op. 19-86 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE PRIME TIME COMMERCE LLC, Plaintiff, Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge v. Court No. 18-00024 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [Sustaining in part and remanding in part the U.S. Department of Commerce’s fina