Cases

BERZON, Circuit Judge: These consolidated appeals were brought by defendants seeking to reduce their sentences for drug-related crimes. They invoke 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which allows a court to reduce in certain circumstances a previously imposed sentence, and contend that the Supreme Court's recent interpretat

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

USCA1 Opinion December 24, 1996 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 96-1278 MARIA DE LOS ANGELES SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. CARLOS ALVARADO, ET AL.,

December 24, 1996 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 96-1278 MARIA DE LOS ANGELES SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. CARLOS ALVARADO, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of

NUMBER 13-07-00565-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

NUMBER 13-07-00565-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG CARBON EL NORTEÑO, L.L.C., RAMON OMAR ALVARADO, AND MICAELA ALVARADO, Appellants, v. JORGE SANCHEZ AND YOLANDA SANCHEZ D/B/A JBY INVESTMENTS, Appellees. On appeal

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* NEIL M. GORSUCH, Circuit Judge. Carla Erica Gonzales Sanchez and Carlos Adan Alvarado were arrested in their hotel room after narcotics agents, believing they had Ms. Gonzales’s consent to enter, found in plain view in the room a variety of drug paraphernalia. After conviction on federal charges, Ms. Gonzales and Mr. Alvarado challenge the district court’s

*946C. A. 11th Cir.; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 105 Fed. Appx. 811; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 112 Fed. Appx. 965; C. A. 9th Cir. Re- ported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 119; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 311; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 505; C. A.

*946C. A. 11th Cir.; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 105 Fed. Appx. 811; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 112 Fed. Appx. 965; C. A. 9th Cir. Re- ported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 119; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 311; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 111 Fed. Appx. 505; C. A.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ORDER Upon consideration of Kevin A. Barnes, et al.’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

DYK, Circuit Judge. ORDER The parties jointly respond to our order directing them to file a status report concerning how these appeals should proceed in view of this court’s decisions in O’Connor v. United States, 308 F.3d 1233 (Fed. Cir.2002) and Mudge v. United States, 308 F.3d 1220 (Fed.Cir.2002). The court previously granted the motion of Fernando Blanco et

*974(Reported below: 101 Fed. Appx. 564); (101 Fed. Appx. 458); (101 Fed. Appx. 563); (101 Fed. Appx. 492); (101 Fed. Appx. 560); (101 Fed. Appx. 464); (101 Fed. Appx. 559); (101 Fed. Appx. 483); (101 Fed. Appx. 509); (101 Fed. Appx. 481);

LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Kevin Barnes et al. (Barnes) notify the court that the United States Court of Federal Claims has requested that this court dismiss “the entire matter on appeal, without prejudice, and remand to this court for the purpose of addressing all outstanding matters.” We treat Barnes’ notification as a motion to remand. The United States has not responded. On

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1477 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHARLES STATES, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Case: 23-10579 Document: 164-2 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/04/2025 REVISED United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-

Case: 23-10579 Document: 139-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June 19, 2025 No. 23

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 253 F. 3d 704 (third, fifth, and sixth judgments) and 705 (first, second, fourth, seventh, and eighth judgments).

PROST, Circuit Judge. Donald O’Connor, et al., (collectively “appellants”) appeal from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims dismissing their complaint for lack of jurisdiction. O’Connor v. United States, 50 Fed.Cl. 285 (2001). Because the court erred in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case, we reverse the court’s dismissal. Because the court correctly granted, in the alternati

Appellate Case: 23-2027 Document: 83-1 Date Filed: 09/16/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 16, 2024