Cases

PER CURIAM: * Jose Mauro Sandoval-Alvarez appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. For the first time on appeal, Sandoval-Alvarez argues that 21 U.S.C. § 841, the statute of conviction, is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). The Government argues that the waiver provision in Sandov

480 F.3d 1180 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jesse Lee HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Luis Farias-Blanco, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Angel Cedillos, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert Herman Boulies, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff

480 F.3d 1005 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jesse Lee HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Luis Farias-Blanco, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Angel Cedillos, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert Herman Boulies, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff

463 F.3d 999 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jesse Lee HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Luis Farias-Blanco, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Angel Cedillos, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert Herman Boulies, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-

429 F.3d 843 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jesse Lee HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Luis Farias-Blanco, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose Angel Cedillos, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Robert Herman Boulies, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-

697 F.Supp.2d 244 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Wilfredo ROSARIO-CAMACHO, Luis Rodriguez-Sostre, Josue Perez-Mercado, Ramon Maysonet-Soler, Jose Negron-Sostre, Defendants. Criminal No. 08-310 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 22, 2010. David Ramos-Pagan, Jorge L. Armenteros-Chervoni, San Juan, PR, for Defendant Jose Rodrigue

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge: This is an interlocutory appeal by criminal defendants challenging a requirement that pretrial detainees making their first appearance before a magistrate judge wear leg shackles. The district-wide shackling policy was implemented by the United States Marshals Service for the Central District of California after consultation with the magistrate judges. In

ORDER The opinion filed September 15, 2006, slip op. 11417, and appearing at 463 F.3d 999 (9th Cir.2006) is withdrawn. A new opinion is being filed this date in its stead. The Petition for Rehearing and Petition for Rehearing En Banc are otherwise DENIED.

ORDER SCHROEDER, Chief Judge. The panel has voted to grant the Petition for Rehearing. The opinion filed November 15, 2005 is hereby withdrawn and the Clerk of Court is directed to file the attached opinion in substitution. OPINION This is an interlocutory appeal by criminal defendants challenging a requirement that pretrial detainees makin

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50524 v.  D.C. No. JESSE LEE HOWARD, CR-03-00390-GAF Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-50525

Case: 23-40338 Document: 115-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/09/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-40338 FILED

(Reported 19 Fed. Appx. 587); C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KAZEN, District Judge. Pending before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, each styled as a “Motion for Dismissal and Sanctions for the Government’s Intentional Destruction of Evidence.” (Docket n. 32, 43). Although Defendants Alvarez and Sandoval filed separate motions with the Court, they both urge the same arguments and rely largely upon the same authorities. Th

67 F.Supp.2d 35 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Allyson VIDAL-CRUZ, et al., Defendants. Nos. 98-277(CCC), 98-279(HL), 98-280(DRD), 98-282(DRD), 98-283(PG), 98-284(SEC), 98-285(PG), 98-287(CCC), 98-289(DRD), 98-290(DRD), 98-291(HL), 98-292(CCC), 98-297(CCC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 1, 1999.

913 F.Supp. 498 (1995) UNITED STATES of America v. Luis Armando SANDOVAL, Silvestre Alvarez. Criminal No. L-95-111-S. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Laredo Division. November 2, 1995. *499 Adolph R. Guerra, Roerig Oliveria & Fisher, Brownsville, TX, for Luis Armando Sandoval. J.C. Trevino, III, Laredo, TX, L

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1157 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. HENRI SALVADOR-GUTIERREZ, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]

*1038516 U. S. 826; 517 U. S. 1135; 517 U. S. 1189; *1039No. 95-1551. No. 95-1555. No. 95-1578. No. 95-1640. No. 95-7022.

*1038516 U. S. 826; 517 U. S. 1135; 517 U. S. 1189; *1039No. 95-1551. No. 95-1555. No. 95-1578. No. 95-1640. No. 95-7022.

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0236p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 18-1899, 18-1933 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. PAUL M. WEADICK, Defendant, Appellant. No. 18-1932 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. FRANCIS P. SALEMME