Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION Memorandum Opinion by Justice GARZA. This appeal arises from a forfeiture proceeding involving $281,420.00 in United States currency.1 See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. ai’ts. 59.01(2)(A), (B), 59.02(a) (Vernon 2006). By four issues, appellant, Gregorio Huerta, contends the trial court erred in (1) denying his no-evidence motion for summ

NUMBER 13-06-00158-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS C

NUMBER 13-06-00158-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG $281,420.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 398th

OPINION ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice. Following the arrest of Jeffrey Carlisle, an admitted drug dealer, Dakota County notified Richard Jacobson that the county intended to forfeit $55,900 in cash seized from a safe located in the apartment Jacobson rented to Carlisle. Jacobson disputed the county’s decision and demanded a judicial determination of the forfeiture. At the subsequent trial, the county present

781 F.Supp. 462 (1991) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. $80,760.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 4-91-228-K. United States District Court. N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. December 16, 1991. William J. Andersen, Asst. U.S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for plaintiff. Charles F. Alario, Brooklyn, N.Y., for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPI

ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, District Judge. This 21 U.S.C. § 881 civil forfeiture case is before the Court on the Motions for Summary Judgment of Plaintiff, the United States of America (the “Government”), as to Maria Medina’s claim to Defendants $13,000.00 in United States Currency (“$13,000”) and 1999 Silver GMC Yukon (“Yukon”) (Doc. # 51) and Victo

DECISION AND ORDER JONATHAN W. FELDMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. Preliminary Statement Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), the Government commenced this action in rem for the forfeiture of the sum of $60,020.00 in United States Currency seized from Claimant Joel Luke on January 12, 2008 at the Greater Rochester International Airport. The Court conducted a bench tr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-cv-2746 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 44 : $599,930.0

778 F.Supp.2d 1099 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. $21,055.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, More or less, Defendant. Case No. 08-1273-WEB. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 31, 2011. *1101 Colin D. Wood, Office Of United States Attorney, Wichita, KS, for Plaintiff. Scott C. Gyllenborg, Gyllenborg &

KIMBALL, C.J. | ,We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether the court of appeal erred in ordering the return of $144,320 to Tina Beers after finding the State did not establish probable cause for forfeiture of the currency under the Seizure and Controlled Dangerous Substances Property Forfeiture Act of 1989 (the Act), La. R.S. 40:2601 et seq. For the reasons stated herein, we find the State prove

USCA4 Appeal: 20-2251 Doc: 77 Filed: 08/10/2022 Pg: 1 of 32 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-2251 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DERECK MCCLELLAN; YVONNE SILVER,

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. Denise Sue Christy stole cash from the vault of the bank where she worked as a teller. She was charged, convicted, and sentenced for various federal crimes. She now appeals. On May 21, 2014, CNB auditors conducted a surprise audit of the Burlington, Kansas Central National Bank ("CNB" or "Bank") vault. The vault was missing $764,000. When t

24-1421 United States v. Ross In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2024 No. 24-1421-cv UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RI

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge: All the defendants were convicted of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and several substantive counts of health care fraud. Individual defendants were convicted of different additional offenses. Defendants appeal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, the jury instructions, the exclusion of certain evidence, and one of the sentences. We

Bauer, Circuit Judge. On March 19, 2015, a jury convicted defendant-appellant Precious House of six counts of bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 , as a result of his involvement in a fraudulent automobile loan scheme. At sentencing, the district co

OPINION SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge. Defendant Chad Hansmeier filed a Motion to Suppress Evidence (d/e 20) and Supplemental Motion to Suppress Evidence (d/ e 33). Hansmeier moves to suppress evidence seized from his residence on the morning of May 15, 2013 and statements he made subsequent to his arrest. Hansmeier also requests a full evidentiary hearing to determine whether the affidavit submitte

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. As part of a routine parole compliance check, state parole agents searched convicted felon Brian Lawrence’s residence and found cocaine and ammunition. A jury acquitted him of the ammunition charge, but convicted him of possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Lawrence appeals, arguing that the government failed to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable

10-3381-cr United States v. Banki UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2010 (Argued: February 15, 2011 Decided: October 24, 2011) (Amended: February 21, 2012) Docket No. 10-3381-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Ap

10-3381-cr United States v. Banki UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2010 (Argued: February 15, 2011 Decided: October 24, 2011) (Amended: February 21, 2012) Docket No. 10-3381-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Ap

CHIN, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Mahmoud Reza Banki (“Banki”) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York convicting him, following a jury trial, of (1) conspiracy to violate the Iranian Transactions Regulations (the “ITR”) and operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business; (2) violating the ITR; (3) operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business; and (4)