Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

792 F.2d 139 Artrip by Artripv.U.S. 86-1510 United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. 6/9/86 1 E.D.Va. AFFIRMED

DYER, Senior Circuit Judge: Harold G. Artrip appeals his conviction for bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1344. He claims that the district court erred in permitting the government to offer evidence which impermissibly enlarged the charges in the indictment. Ar-trip contends that the district court’s failure to instruct the jury on the limited admissibility of this

27 B.R. 54 (1983) In the Matter of Norman B. & Patricia A. ARTRIP, Debtors. MAAS BROTHERS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Norman B. & Patricia A. ARTRIP, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 81-698, Adv. No. 81-231. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. January 18, 1983. *55 John R. Shuman, Clearwater, Fla., for pl

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1641 L (Filed: October 30, 2024) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * GARY ANGELLY, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * THE UNITED STATES,

973 F.2d 923 Artripv.Ebasco Services* NO. 92-7214 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug 13, 1992 1 Appeal From: S.D.Tex. 2

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1805C Filed: December 6, 2022 FOR PUBLICATION DERRICK T. DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Jason Ellis Perry, Law Office of Jason Perry, LLC, Wellington, FL, for the plaintiff. Douglas Glenn Edelschick, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Wash

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-778 Filed under seal: December 8, 2022 Reissued: December 16, 2022 * FOR PUBLICATION SEKRI, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Alan M. Grayson, Orlando, FL, for the plaintiff. Rafique Anderson, Commercial Litigatio

651 F.Supp. 376 (1987) Terry ARTRIP, Plaintiff, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. No. 84 Civ. 6972 (CBM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 13, 1987. *377 Freeman, Wagner, Tabakman & Weiss by Lewis B. Insler, New York City, for plaintiff. Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. A

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ___________________________________ ) JG TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 20-455C ) THE UNITED STATES, ) Filed: October 29, 2021 ) Defendant.

In the United States Court of Federal Claims ) POWER DENSITY SOLUTIONS LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 21-911C v. ) (Filed: April 8, 2022) ) THE UNITED STAT

744 F.Supp.2d 352 (2010) Susan FOLEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 2:09-cv-239-GZS. United States District Court, D. Maine. October 4, 2010. *353 Samuel K. Rudman, Ivy Frignoca, Lambert Coffin, Portland, ME, for Plaintiff. Evan J. Roth, U.S. Attorney's Office, Portland, ME, for Defendant. <

COX, Circuit Judge: The principal issue we address in this appeal is this: By what standard do we review a district court’s unobjected-to constructive amendment of a defendant’s indictment? We hold that we apply plain-error review. Having concluded that the district court constructively amended Count 2 of Kenneth Lamar Madden’s superseding indictment and that the amendment sat

Case: 11-14302 Date Filed: 08/16/2013 Page: 1 of 18 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT __________________________ No. 11-14302 __________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00012-JDW-AEP-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

526 F.3d 747 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles E. EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-11643. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 5, 2008. *748 Mark Yurachek, Bruce S. Harvey, Atlanta, GA, for Edwards. John Russell Phillips, Amy Levin Weil and Randy S. Chartash, U.S. Attys.,

Artrip appeals from a judgment convicting him of escaping from the penitentiary while serving a sentence. Code 1940, T. 14, § 153, as amended. He was sentenced to two years further confinement. Artrip did not adduce evidence to support a traverse of the indictment, contenting himself merely with developing matters of avoidance and mitigation. The State's evidence made out a prima facie case. On arraignment Artrip pled former jeopardy, alleging in part as follows:

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Andrea A. Ruff appeals the judgment of the district court, on summary judgment, in favor of plaintiff-ap-pellee the United States of America in the amount of $20,000, arising from Ruffs failure to honor an Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) levy on property or rights to property of a delinquent taxpayer in her possession. Un

179 B.R. 967 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Andrea A. RUFF, etc., Defendant. No. 93-604-Civ-Orl-22. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. January 9, 1995. Ralph E. Hopkins, U.S. Attorney's Office, Orlando, FL, Philip Doyle, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Stephen G. Salley and Russell P.

PER CURIAM: This appeal was taken from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, affirming the administrative denial of “black lung” benefits sought pursuant to the regulations enacted under the Federal Coal Mine Health Safety Act of 1969, as amended, 30 U.S.C. § 901,

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Lenard E. Trimmer brought an administrative action under 42 U.S.C. § 5851, the whistleblower provision of the Energy Reorganization Act, against his employer, the Los Alamos National Laboratory (the “Lab”), which is owned by the Department of Energy but run by the University of California. Trimmer claimed that the Lab wrongfully delayed an alternate employment-pl