Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
1 opinion for “United States v. Ascencio-Meraz”
59 F.3d 174NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Pedro ESPINOZA-OBLITAS, Petitioner,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70390. United States C