Cases

[Cite as State v. Axson, 2019-Ohio-5240.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 108246 v. : BENTLEY AXSON, :

EBEL, Circuit Judge. In 1998, Plaintiff Christina Axson-Flynn entered the University of Utah’s Actor Training Program (ATP). Axson-Flynn, who is Mormon, refused to say the word “fuck” or take God’s name in vain during classroom acting exercises. During Ax-son-Flynn’s first semester in the program, Defendants — all ATP faculty members— told Axson-Flynn to “get over” her refusal

151 F.Supp.2d 1326 (2001) Christina AXSON-FLYNN, Plaintiff, v. Xan JOHNSON, Sandy Shotwell, Sarah Shippobotham, Barbara Smith, Jerry Gardner, and John Does 1-20, Defendants. No. 2:00-CV-00033C. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. August 3, 2001. *1327 James W. McConkie, III, Bradley H. Parker, Elizabeth A. Cl

SECOND DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., DAVIS, J., and SENIOR JUDGE FULLER NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.gov/rules June 12, 2026

254 Ga. 248 (1985) 327 S.E.2d 732 AXSON v. NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION et al. 41947. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided April 3, 1985. Jones, Bordeaux & Assoc., John Wright Jones, Noble L. Boykin, Jr., for appellant. Brannen, Wessels & Searcy, Darlene Y. Ross, Lee & Clark, Fred S. Clark, for appellees. G

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-1820 ____________ BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB CO., Appellant v. SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; CENTER

OPINION ON REHEARING SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. Grace United Methodist Church (Grace United or Church), a non-profit religious corporation affiliated with the United Methodist Church, filed a civil action pursuant to the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Cheyenne, Wyoming and other affiliated defendants (h

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. Grace United Methodist Church (Grace United or Church), a non-profit religious corporation affiliated with the United Methodist Church, filed a civil action pursuant to the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000ce et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Cheyenne, Wyoming and other affi

451 F.3d 643 GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF CHEYENNE; City of Cheyenne Board of Adjustment; Dorothy Wilson, City of Cheyenne Development Director; Cheyenne City Council, Defendant-Appellees,Mountview Park Homeowners' Association, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee,United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Intervenor,The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Amicus Curiae. No.

427 F.3d 775 GRACE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITY OF CHEYENNE; City of Cheyenne Board of Adjustment; Dorothy Wilson, City of Cheyenne Development Director; Cheyenne City Council, Defendant-Appellees,Mountview Park Homeowners' Association, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee,United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Intervenor,The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, Amicus Curiae. No.

PER CURIAM: The appellant Daniel F. Johnson was found guilty by a jury on two counts of an eight count indictment. Both of the counts charged him with theft of an interstate freight shipment of a value in excess of $100 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. Judgments of conviction were entered against him and he has appealed.

III. Discussion A. Standard of Review The district court denied Defendant's motion to dismiss based on its conclusion Plaintiffs were entitled to judgment on the pleadings as a matter of law. We review this ruling de novo. Utah Republican Party v. Cox , 892 F.3d 1066

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge, dissenting: It is clear, in my view, that there was no probable cause for Officer Yazzie to file a criminal complaint against Mr. Panagoula-kos, the Plaintiff, after Officer Yazzie had reviewed the protective order which she quite mistakenly believed provided such probable cause.1 The majority’s holding that the officer is entitled to qualified immunity

Branch, Judge. Rufus Chestnut was tried by a Coffee County jury and convicted of violating OCGA § 42-1-12, which required Chestnut, as a registered sex offender, to provide the Coffee County sheriff’s office with 72 hours advance notice of any change in his residential address, with such notice to include the new address to which Chestnut was moving. Chestnut now appeals, arguing

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David D. Egan, J.), rendered April 22, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the second degree (two counts). It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of two counts of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David D. Egan, J.), rendered April 22, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the second degree (two counts). It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of two counts of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25

OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. This case involves constitutional challenges to the Ohio Dangerous Wild Animals and Restricted Snakes Act, Ohio Revised Code §§ 935.01-935.99. Plaintiffs-appellants are seven owners of animals regulated by the Act. Defendants-appel-lees are the Director of the Ohio Department of Agriculture, named in

Case: 20-20215 Document: 00515919207 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/29/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 29, 2021

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Navid Yeasin filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Defendant Tammara Durham, the University of Kansas’s Vice Provost for Student Affairs, retaliated against him in violation of his First Amendment rights and violated his substantive due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. This matter is before the

7/8/2021 2:30:57 PM Compare Results Old File: New File: 19-123.pdf 19-123_new.pdf versus 110 pages (538 KB) 110 pages (606 KB)