Cases

OPINION J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge. Plaintiff Helane Bulmash (“Bulmash”) has brought suit against Travelers Indemnity Company (“Travelers”) alleging that Travelers failed to tender payment of statutory interest on Personal Injury Protection claims that were paid late by Travelers. Now pending is Bulmash’s motion for class certification, opposed by Travelers. The issues have been fully briefed and n

MOSK, J., Concurring and Dissenting. Although I agree with the majority that the subpoena in this case did not violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution or article I, section 13, of the California Constitution (Brovelli v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 524, 529 [15 Cal.Rptr. 630, 364 P.2d 462]), I cannot join them in importing the questionable federal requi

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SPINE CARE DELAWARE, LLC ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N18C-01-253 EMD CCLD ) UNITED STATES AUTOMOBILE ) ASSOCIATION, USAA G

442 F.Supp. 579 (1977) MANALIS FINANCE CO., a co-partnership, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. CV 74-212-WMB. United States District Court, C. D. California. August 9, 1977. *580 Kirsch, Arak & Bulmash, Jay S. Bulmash, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiff. Robert L. Brosio, U.S. Atty., Charles H. Ma

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves conflicting claims to Medical funds owed Manchester Community Hospital. The dispute is between Manalis, a lender holding a perfected security interest in the hospital’s accounts receivable, and the United States, which claims the money under a federal tax lien resulting from the hospital’s failure to pay federal employment t

MOORE, Circuit Judge: Petitioner, The First National Bank of Boston, a National Banking Corporation (the Bank), applies for a writ of mandamus directing a United States District Judge for the Central District of California to vacate and set aside his order denying Petitioner’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative to transfer the case entitled, “Jose Navarrete, Plaintiff v. First National Bank of Boston, a National Banking

47 Cal.3d 456 (1988) 763 P.2d 1326 253 Cal. Rptr. 236 MICHAEL HUTNICK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. S005221. Supreme Court of California. December 1, 1988. *460 COUNSEL Kent Wal

468 F.2d 180 The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BOSTON, a National Bankingcorporation, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OFCALIFORNIA, Respondent;Jose A. NAVARRETE, Real Party in Interest. No. 72-2049. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Sept. 28, 1972. Fred F. Gr

Filed 7/28/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR THE PEOPLE ex rel. ROB BONTA, as Attorney General, Plaintiff and Respondent, A171390 v. (City & County of GREENPOWER MOTOR San Francisco Super. Ct. COMPANY, INC. et al., No. CPF-24-518469) Defendants and A

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 20-2371 ____________ ELIZABETH PANZARELLA; JOSHUA PANZARELLA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants v. NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, INC. ____________

Filed 5/17/19; certified for publication 6/11/19 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent, A153205 v. (San Francisco County UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL,

Filed 10/29/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE LUXURY ASSET LENDING, LLC, Plaintiff and Respondent, G057766 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2016-00880965) PHILADELPHIA TELEVISION OPINION NETWO

Petrou, J. *70Appellants Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser-CA, LLC, and Rasier, LLC (collectively, Uber) challenge an order directing them to comply with administrative subpoenas issued by the City Attorney of San Francisco (the City Attorney) for reports and data submitted to the California Public

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JORDAN MARKS, individually and on No. 14-56834 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 3:14-cv-00348- BAS-BLM v. CRUNCH SAN DIEGO, LLC, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Dis

516 F.Supp. 1317 (1981) Willie Warren CRAFT and Louis A. DeSalle, III, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS; John E. Corbally; Joseph Begando; Truman O. Anderson; Morton Creditor; Howard M. Bers; Jerome Silver; Gerald Cerchio; Penny Persico; Elizabeth McGrew; Jack Bulmash; Olga Jonasson; Lawrence Solomon; Leon LeBeau; Ruth Seelers; Joan Anderson, Director of the Illinois Department of Registration and Education; Patricia

Filed 1/16/20; Ordered Published 2/10/20 (order attached) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL D075617 BOARD, Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2018-00048033- v.

943 A.2d 630 (2008) 178 Md. App. 648 Robert H. KEELER v. ACADEMY OF AMERICAN FRANCISCAN HISTORY, INC. No. 2433, Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. March 4, 2008. *631 James A. Vidmar, Jr. (Jennifer D. Larkin, Linowes and Blocher, LLP, on brief), Bethesda, for appellant. Patrick

51 Cal.App.4th 267 (1996) DAVID MOHILEF, Individually and as Trustee, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ROBERT JANOVICI et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B096420. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One. November 27, 1996. *276 COUNSEL Jay S. Bulmash for Plaintiffs and Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBEN CASTILLO, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), as Receiver for Colonial Bank (“Colonial”), brings this action against Boris Masarsky and Linda M. Surges (collectively, “Defendants”) asserting breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and negligence. The FDIC’s action arises out of real estate appraisals of a residen

165 Cal.App.4th 841 (2008) THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PET FOOD EXPRESS LIMITED, Defendant and Appellant. No. C057156. Court of Appeals of California, Third District. July 31, 2008. *844 Henn, Etzel & Moore and John Douglas Moore for Defendant and Appellant.