Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and GEIS, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Preston J. BURKE Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Cor

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Edmond Charles Burke has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Burke has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge On April 2, 2014, defendant Dennis Burke was sentenced to seventy-two months of incarceration after his plea of guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute five hundred grams or more of cocaine and 28 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846. See J. in a Criminal Case

PER CURIAM: Darryl Burke and Vicki Garland, his wife, appeal their convictions for conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, and bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Burke also appeals the prison sentences received, totaling 360 months, for his convictions.1 Burke and Garland challenge their convictions on the ground that the district court abused its di

CCA S32137. On consideration of Appellee’s motion to dismiss the petition for grant of review for lack of jurisdiction, it is ordered that the petition for grant of review is hereby dismissed without prejudice to Appellant’s right to file a petition for grant of review on a subsequent date.

CCA 20120448. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to June 8,2015.

CCA S32137. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted to January 26, 2015.

CCA S32137. Appellant’s second motion to extend time to file the supplement to the petition for grant of review granted up to and including February 10, 2015.

790 F.Supp.2d 1272 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Anthony Edyle BURKE, Defendant. Nos. CR-11-044-EFS, CR-06-0113-EFS. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. May 6, 2011. *1273 Thomas Owen Rice, U.S. Attorney's Office, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

633 F.3d 984 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric R. BURKE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-3030. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. February 2, 2011. *985 William D. Lunn, Jr., William D. Lunn Attorney at Law (G. Gordon Atcheson, The Atcheson Law Firm, Westwood, KS, on Opening Brief), Tulsa, OK, f

PER CURIAM: Randolph P. Murrell, appointed counsel for Willie J. Burke, Jr., has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record revea

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit February 2, 2011 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court

571 F.3d 1048 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Todd BURKE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-8033. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 7, 2009. *1050 Patrick J. LeBrun, Casper, WY, for Defendant-Appellant. *1051 David A. Kubichek, Assistant Unite

607 F.Supp.2d 1314 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. John A. BURKE, James V. Cadicamo, David D'Arpino, Michael D. Finnerty, and Guy T. Peden. Case No. 8:08-cr-323-T-23TGW. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. March 3, 2009. *1315 Jay G. Trezevant, Adelaide G. Few, U.S. Attorney's Office, Tampa, FL, for Pla

605 F.Supp.2d 688 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Dennis Egbert BURKE, Defendant. Criminal No. RWT-08-367. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 10, 2009. *691 Stacy Dawson Belf, United States Attorneys Office, Greenbelt, MD, for United States of America. Joanna Silver, Office of the Federal Public Defender,

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Lonnie Albert Burke, Jr., has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Burke has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Case No. 1:24-cr-00265-1 (TNM) ROBERT P. BURKE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER A jury trial resulted in ADM Robert Burke’s (USN, Ret.) conviction on four felonies. See Judgment, ECF No. 350. He has since appealed his conviction and

MEMORANDUM ** Adrian Stephen Burke appeals from his 77-month sentence imposed following a guilty-plea conviction for Unlawful Reentry of a Deported Alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we remand. Burke contends that the district court erred by basing a 16-level enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i), on a Nevada ju

GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Defendant-appellant Robert D. Burke was convicted pursuant to a guilty plea of attempt to commit extortion under color of official right contrary to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1951-52. Burke challenges his 96-month sentence. We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW Robert Burke, an Alderman for Holly Springs, Mississippi, wa

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the memoranda filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order of detention b