Cases

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Mario Barajas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Barajas has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant parts of the record reflected t

MEMORANDUM OPINION ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge Defendant is currently serving an eighty-four-month prison term imposed in July 2011, following a guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine and a detectable amount of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. Before th

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Fernando Barajas seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 2

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Samuel Barajas was convicted in a jury trial of conspiracy to distribute more than 500 grams of methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(viii) (Count 1); aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B)(viii) (Count 2); and usin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA L E D Ju~ 03 2011 Clerk, U.S. District UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Courtsf th of e Dfstr & Bank ict of Coigiii§i; v. Criminal N0. 11-148 (ESH) LUIS BARAJAS, Defendant. S€§/§/§§/&\)€\f ORDER ln a hearing before Magistrate Judge Kay on May 16, 2011, defendant Luis Barajas entered a plea of guilty. On l\/Iay 18, 2011, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation advising the Court to accept defendant’s plea. The Court has

MEMORANDUM ** Isaac Alcauter Barajas appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 120-month sentence for distribution of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Barajas’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as co

655 F.3d 1077 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Mario BARAJAS-ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50134. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 15, 2011. Filed August 24, 2011. *1079 James M. Chavez, Esquire, Federal Defenders of San Diego, San Diego,

ORDER AMENDING MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION AND DENYING PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC The Memorandum disposition filed on August 7, 2007, is amended to reflect the recent decision in United States v. Salazar-Lopez, 506 F.3d 748 (9th Cir.2007). With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. The full c

MEMORANDUM ** Piedad Barajas-Avalos appeals from the two concurrent 210-month sentences imposed upon resentencing following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii), and 846, and manufacturing and attempt to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii). Pursuant to Anders

MEMORANDUM ** Nicolas Barajas-Trujillo appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Barajas-Trujillo’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as coun

MEMORANDUM ** Nicolas Barajas-Trujillo appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Barajas-Trujillo’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as coun

MEMORANDUM ** Hector Ceja Barajas appeals from his 135-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered into know

MEMORANDUM ** Piedad Barajas-Avalos appeals from the two concurrent 210-month sentences imposed upon resentencing following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii), and 846, and manufacturing and attempt to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(A)(viii). Pursuant to Anders

AMENDED MEMORANDUM * Carlos Barajas-Romo appeals his illegal reentry conviction and 70-month sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We affirm. Even if we accept Barajas-Romo’s claim that the 2004 removal hearing deprived him of his due process rights, this claim fails because he has not shown prejudice resulting from the due process violation. See United States v. Ubaldo-Figueroa, 364

MEMORANDUM * Carlos Barajas-Romo appeals his illegal reentry conviction and 70-month sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We affirm. Even if we accept Barajas-Romo’s claim that the 2004 removal hearing deprived him of his due, process rights, this claim fails because he has not shown prejudice resulting from the due process violation. See United States v. Ubaldo-Figueroa, 364 F.3d 1

MEMORANDUM ** Huren Bajaras-Becerril appeals from the 63-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Barajas-Becerril contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(i

MEMORANDUM * Petitioner Barajas-Bandt was tried and convicted of attempting to reenter the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He challenges the District Court’s 1) exclusion of medical records and testimony supporting his diminished capacity defense, 2) admission of statements made to inspectors at the border, 3) refusal to charge the jury with a mistake of fact instruction, a

PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Alejandro Sanchez Barajas has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Barajas was informed of his right to respond but has not done so. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the mot

*738ORDER AND JUDGMENT* WADE BRORBY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted wi

MEMORANDUM ** Antonio Barajas-Ruiz appeals from the 34-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being found in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Barajas-Ruiz contends that the district court erred in calculating his sentencing range because it incorrectly applied a 16-l