Cases

CCA 20160587. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is orderéd that said petition is hereby granted on issue two raised by Appellant pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982), and the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) ) ) Criminal Action N0. 92-CR-405-11 (RCL) v. ) ) MAURICE BARKSDALE ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM & ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Maurice Barksdale’s motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(0)(2) to reduce his sentence based on amendments to the United States Sentencing Guidelines is before this Court. Upon consideration of the motion and the entire record herein, the motion will be DENIED. II. FACTUAL AND PR

PER CURIAM: * Brandon Barksdale pleaded guilty to all five counts of his,superseding bill of information: conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute at least 500 grams but not more than 1.5 kilograms of cocaine base (Count 1); possession with intent to distribute a quantity of 3,4 methylenediox-methamphetamine (Count 2); using, carrying, and discharging a firearm in relation to a drug traffi

In the United States Court of Federal Claims CHRISTOPHER S. BARKSDALE, Plaintiff, No. 24-cv-1102 v. Filed: November 20, 2024 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Christopher S. Barksdale, Cleveland, Ohio, appearing pro se. Joshua David Tully, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Commercial Lit

17 F.3d 391 U.S.v.Barksdale NO. 93-1454 United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Dec 15, 1993 1 Appeal From: E.D.N.Y. 2 AFFIRMED.

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 22-2284 _______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. WILLIAM BARKSDALE, Appellant _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of N

JUDGMENT Per Curiam This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed June 15 and August 11, 2016 be affirmed. The court correctly held that district courts lack auth

848 F.2d 1239 U.S.v.Barksdale* NO. 87-1595 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. MAY 25, 1988 1 Appeal From: N.D.Tex. 2

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 24-1788, 24-2168 & 24-2388 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STEPHON DEMUS, RYAN CLARK, and MARLON BARKSDALE Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeals from t

790 F.2d 891 *U.S.v.Barksdale 85-1659 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. 5/22/86 1 N.D.Tex. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------

759 F.2d 20 *U.S.v.Barksdale 84-3835 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. 3/26/85 1 E.D.La. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------

Petition for rehearing denied.

*1843Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTOPHER BARKSDALE, ) ) Plaintiff’ l Case: 1:16-cv-O112O Jury Demand ) Assigned T0 : Unassigned v- § Assign_ mate ; 6/15/2016 Descri tion: Pr S G .C` `| UNITED STATES oF AMERIcA,ezaL, ) p 0 e en 'V' (F De°k) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis and his pro se civil complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed. Pl

667 F.2d 97 U. S.v.Barksdale 80-6005 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Eleventh Circuit 12/30/81 1 M.D.Fla. AFFIRMED

499 F.Supp. 624 (1980) UNITED STATES of America v. Fred C. BARKSDALE. No. 80-52-Cr-T-GC. United States District Court, M. D. Florida, Tampa Division. October 10, 1980. *625 Judy Rice, Steve Cowen, Asst. U. S. Attys., Tampa, Fla., for plaintiff. Raymond LaPorte, Tampa, Fla., for defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION

487 F.2d 1404 U. S.v.Barksdale 73-1162 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Seventh Circuit 11/8/73 1 N.D.Ind. AFFIRMED

489 F.2d 757 U. S.v.Barksdale 73-1669 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Seventh Circuit 12/17/73 1 N.D.Ind. AFFIRMED

Petition for rehearing denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.