Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Vv. ) Criminal No. 95-088-2 (PLF) ) PERCY BARRON, ) Defendant ) ) OPINION AND ORDER Pending before this Court is defendant Percy Barron’s Emergency Motion for Compassionate Release Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) and Memorandum in Support Thereof (“Def. Mot.”) [Dkt. No. 593]. Mr. Barron contends that his medical conditions, “place[] him at serious risk of becoming severely ill from COVID-

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, HOUTZ, and MYERS Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Trevor P. BARRON Electronics Technician (Nuclear) Third Class (E-4), U.S. Navy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) ) Criminal No. 95-0088-2 (PLF) PERCY BARRON, ) ) Defendant. ) __

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) ) Criminal No. 95-0088 -(02) (PLF) PERCY BARRON, ) ) Defendant.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) ) Criminal No. 95-0088 (PLF) PERCY BARRON, ) ) Defendant. )

PER CURIAM: Edgardo Barron-Espinosa appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Barron-Espinosa, No. 5:13-cr-00259-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 3, 2015).* We dispense with oral argument

557 F.3d 866 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charles BARRON, Appellant. No. 08-1613. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: September 23, 2008. Filed: March 5, 2009. *868 Lee Lawless, AFPD, argued, St. Louis, Mo, for Appellant. Reginald L. Harris, AUSA, argued, St. Louis,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 95-0088-2 (PLF) ) Civil Action No. 16-1314 (PLF) PERCY BARRON, )

MEMORANDUM** Appellant Jessie Barron (“Barron”) waived the right to challenge the admissibility of his prior conviction by introducing the conviction on direct examination. Ohler v. United States, 529 U.S. 753, 760, 120 S.Ct. 1851, 146 L.Ed.2d 826 (2000) (“a defendant who preemptively introduces evidence of a prior conviction on direct examination may not on appeal claim that the admission of such

PER CURLAM: * Jorge Alberto Barron-Hernandez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Barron-Hernandez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a

PER CURIAM.* Court-appointed counsel for Isai Barron-Lopez has requested leave to 'withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Barron-Lopez has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-2181 L Filed: October 31, 2024 ________________________________________ ) DEBORAH E. BARRON and JOHN ) BUENAVENTURA BAEZ, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, )

Judge SULLIVAN delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer members at Fort Stewart, Georgia, on various dates in 1995. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of committing indecent acts with a minor female (2 specifications) and indecent assault on th

Case: 23-50515 Document: 51-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED

ORDER Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular' active judges of this court, it is ordered that these eases be reheard by the en bane court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. *810The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Barron, 127 F.3d 890 (9th Cir.1997), amended by slip. op. 1867, 136 F.3d 675 (March 6, 1998), and the three-judge panel unpublishe

98 F.3d 1338 U.S.v.Barron NO. 95-40886 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Sept 09, 1996 Appeal From: E.D.Tex., No. 6:95-CR-24 1 AFFIRMED.

940 F.Supp. 1489 (1996) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. William Scott BARRON, Jr., Defendant. No. A91-0115 CR (JKS). United States District Court, D. Alaska. August 13, 1996. Opinion Denying Reconsideration September 25, 1996. *1490 Mark Rosenbaum, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Robert Bundy, United States

Case: 21-50776 Document: 00516279347 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/13/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

35 F.3d 559 U.S.v.Barron* NO. 93-08615 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Aug 23, 1994 1 Appeal From: W.D.Tex. 2

87 F.3d 1313 U.S.v.Barron* NO. 95-50587 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. May 21, 1996Rehearing Denied June 21, 1996. Appeal From: W.D.Tex., No. SA-93-CR-267 1 AFFIRMED.