Cases

Case: 21-50057 Document: 00516158406 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/07/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Bartolo Jose Bautista-Quiro-ga has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bautista-Quiroga has not filed a response. We have reviewed

532 F.3d 667 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rogelio BAUTISTA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-1620. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued December 7, 2007. Decided July 14, 2008. *668 Felicia M. Alesia (argued), Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintif

SUMMARY ORDER Defendant Miguel Bautista pleaded guilty on November 21, 2000, to one count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), *924841(b)(1)(C), and 846. Presently serving a 240-month term of incarceration, Bautista appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to compel the government t

MEMORANDUM * Richard Patrick Bautista (“Bautista”) appeals his sentence after his guilty plea conviction for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court’s sentence.1 The district court found that Bautista was a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 because both of Bautista’s p

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 07-1620 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROGELIO BAUTISTA, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Norther

BARKETT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I believe that the district court was eminently correct in finding that the totality of the meager facts presented in this case do not total reasonable suspicion, and the district court’s conclusions are entitled to our deference. The Fourth Amendment was designed to protect the rights of people against unreasonable searches and seizures. As ou

MEMORANDUM ** Defendants-Appellants Efrain Suarez Delgado and Jesus Mendoza-Bautista appeal their convictions and their sentences for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and for distribution of cocaine. We affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recite them here. ANALYSIS United States v. Delgado, No. 05-30429 1. Speed

MEMORANDUM** Cervando Bautista-Pascual appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to being an alien in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Bautista-Pascual contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2), which increases the statutory maximum sentence upon a finding that the defendant was removed “subsequent to a conviction of an aggravated felony,” should,

MEMORANDUM *** Defendant-Appellant Juan Bautista-Concepción appeals his thirty-six month sentence following a guilty plea in the district court to a one count indictment charging him with being a previously deported alien found in the United States without permission in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. Defendant-Appellant arg

MEMORANDUM** Polly Ann Conner Bautista appeals the district court’s two-level upward departure following her guilty plea conviction for identity theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028, and for passing an altered postal money order in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 500. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s interpretation of the Sentencin

MEMORANDUM ** Federal prisoner Ricardo Bautista-Ramos appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and we affirm. Bautista-Ramos contends that the district court erred by imposing a sentence based on judge-f

MEMORANDUM ** Jorge Antonio Bautista-Mendoza appeals from the revocation of supervised release and his resulting seven-month sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Bautista-Mendoza’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental bri

*450MEMORANDUM** Ricardo Bautista-Ramos appeals the seventy-seven month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry by a previously deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Bautista-Ramos contends he is entitled to a “horizontal” departure under U.S.S.G. § 4A1

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 00-3227 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jose Bautista, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 99 CR 97--Joan B. Gottschall, Judge. Argued January 17, 2001--Decided July 12, 2001 Before Easterbrook, Evans, and Williams, Circuit Judges. Williams, Circuit Judge. Jose Bautista, a resident alien of the United States,

MEMORANDUM ** Jose de Jesus Bautista-Macias (“Bautis-ta”) appeals the district court’s sentence following a conviction for one count of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(viii). The district court sentenced Bautista to 188 months incarceration after increasing his base offense level based on a finding that he possessed a dange

MEMORANDUM ** Octavio Bautista-Osuna appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being an illegal alien found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Osuna’s attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), on the ground that the case presents no non-frivolous issue suitable for appeal

BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge. Michael Bautista (Bautista) appeals from his conviction and sentence following a jury trial wherein he was found guilty of second-degree murder in Indian Country under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 1111. Facts On April 4,1996, the body of David Carrillo (Carrillo), a 38-year-old member of t

134 F.3d 385 U.S.v.Bautista-Chavarriage* NO. 96-5230 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Dec 30, 1997 Appeal From: S.D.Fla. ,No.9200734CRFAM 1 Affirmed.

13 F.3d 409 U.S.v.Bautista* NO. 91-2415 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Dec 27, 1993 1 Appeal From: M.D.Fla. 2