Cases

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before GASTON, HOLIFIELD, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. David C. BELTRAN Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201500270 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. MATTHEW R. BELTRAN Chief Aviation Electrician’s Mate (E-7), U.S. Navy Appellant

19-2239-cr United States of America v. Beltran-Leyva (Guzman Loera) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2021 Argued: October 25, 2021 Decided: January 25, 2022 Docket No. 19-2239 ------------------------------------------ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, V. JOAQUIN A

MEMORANDUM * Manuel Beltran-Higuera appeals from his conviction as an accessory after the fact to the assault of several United States Coast Guard (USCG) officers, 18 U.S.C. § 111(a)(1), (b), and as an accessory after the fact for failure to heave to in compliance with the commands of a USCG vessel, 18 U.S.C. § 2237(a)(1). He also appeals his sentence, arguing that the district court improperly applied vario

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Isauro Beltran-Quiroz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Beltran-Quiroz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of t

MEMORANDUM ** Javier Beltran appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Beltran’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the

ORDER Freddie Beltran-Figueroa, a Mexican citizen who was removed from the United States in 2006 after being convicted in 2003 for distributing cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), pleaded guilty to illegal reentry, 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and admitted to violating the terms of his supervised release for the drug conviction. The district court imposed a within-guidelines sentence of 57 months’ imprisonment for illegal reentry and 12 months’ reim

663 F.3d 1056 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco BELTRAN VALDEZ, AKA Carlos Zazueta Villa, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-50117. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted October 12, 2011.[*] Filed November 21, 2011. Gerson Simon, San Marino, CA, for the defendant-appellant. Laura E. Duffy

571 F.3d 1013 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro BELTRAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-2191. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. June 12, 2009. *1015 Erlinda O. Johnson, Law Office of Erlinda Ocampo Johnson, LLC, Albuquerque, NM, for Defendant-Appellant. David N. Williams, Assistant

MEMORANDUM** Juan Jose Beltran-Lopez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Beltran-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provide

731 F.Supp.2d 1126 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Luis BELTRAN-PALAFOX, and Raymundo Elenes-Mombela, Defendants. Case No. 09-40022-01/02-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 3, 2010. *1132 Jared S. Maag, Office of United States Attorney, Topeka, KS, for Plaintiff. Marilyn M. Trubey, Office of

556 F.3d 913 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Angel BELTRAN-MORENO, aka El Tan Beltran, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abraham Beltran-Moreno, aka Abram aka Abram Beltran-Moreno aka Adrian Beltran-Figueroa, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-10368. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Ja

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 07-10368 v.  D.C. No. CR-05-00546-NVW JOSE ANGEL BELTRAN-MORENO, aka El Tan Beltran, Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 07-10368 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-05-00546-NVW District of Arizona, JOSE ANGEL BELTRAN-MORENO, aka El Tan Beltran, Phoenix Defendant-Appellant.

MEMORANDUM ** The facts and procedural posture of the case are known to the parties, and we do *536not repeat them here. On appeal, Appellant Remberto Beltran (“Appellant”) argues that the district court committed two evidentiary errors at trial that warrant reversal of his conviction for conspiracy to distribute more than 50 grams of methamphetamin

503 F.3d 1 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Noraida BELTRÁN, Defendant, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Nelson Acevedo-Cruz, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 06-2220, 06-2221. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard July 30, 2007. Decided September 14, 2007. Julio C. Alejandro-Serrano with whom Nicol

MEMORANDUM** Jose Ernesto Beltran-Quinonez appeals the 36-month sentence imposed upon him following his guilty plea to one count of conveying false information concerning the bringing of a nuclear warhead into the United States for use in Boston, Massachusetts. See 18 U.S.C. § 1038(a)(1). He contends that although the district court properly calculated his base Guideline sentence pursuant to USSG

670 F.Supp.2d 1207 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Luis BELTRAN-RIVERA, Defendant. No. CR 08-2722 JB. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. October 7, 2009. Gregory J. Fouratt, United States Attorney, Mary Catherine McCulloch, Assistant United States Attorney, Albuquerque, NM, for the Plaintiff. *1208

MEMORANDUM * While attempting to cross the border into Mexico, Fidel Beltran was arrested and charged with violating 31 U.S.C. §§ 5316 and 5332 and 18 U.S.C. § 1001. He was convicted by a jury on all three counts. He appeals; we reverse. Title 31 U.S.C. § 5316 proscribes an individual from willfully failing to file a report declaring the amount of money in his possession whenever he depart

MEMORANDUM* Jorge Beltran-Carranza (“Beltran”) pleaded guilty to violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326, Reentry of Removed Alien. He challenges his 46-month sentence arguing that the district court improperly sentenced him *661under § 1326(b) rather than § 1326(a), which carries a maximum sentence of two years. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18