Cases

DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge. Defendant appeals from his conviction for bank robbery. 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d). On appeal, he argues that the district court 1 deprived him of a fair trial by admitting irrelevant identification testimony, refusing to grant a continuance or hold a suppression hearing when he was s

91 F.Supp. 834 (1950) VAN GORDON v. UNITED STATES. No. 5670. United States District Court W. D. Missouri, W. D. June 5, 1950. Kenneth C. West, Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff. Lyman Field, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant. REEVES, Chief Judge. By stipulation of the parties it is agreed that the plaintiff received injuries because of the negligenc

486 S.W.2d 664 (1972) Allena JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Respondent. No. 34471. Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division 2. October 31, 1972. *665 William R. Hirsch, Clayton, for plaintiff-appellant. Guilfoil, Symington & Petzall, Gord

263 S.W.2d 889 (1954) UNITED FARM AGENCY v. HOWALD et al. No. 28747. St. Louis Court of Appeals. Missouri. January 19, 1954. *890 Roy Hamlin, Hannibal, for appellants. Onie D. Newlon, New London, Robert E. Crist, Fred C. Bollow, Shelbina, for respondent. WOLFE, Commissioner. This is a suit to recover a commis

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Joseph Martin Swaringen, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2022-000928 Appeal From Greenville County Perry H. Gravely, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 6109 Heard November 14, 2024 – Filed April 23, 2025

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEION E. PAGE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-1744 (CJN) WHOLE FOODS MARKET SERVICES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Deion Page and his mother, Ethelia Roberts, worked for Whole Foods. A series of unfortunate events led their coworke

OPINION OF THE COURT Saxe, J. The determination of equitable distribution made by the Special Referee and incorporated in the court’s judgment is both inequitable and unsupported by the record in numerous respects; in particular, the conclusion that plaintiff had no right to any portion of the marital residence or its appreciation in value was contrary to fundamental principles of equitable distribution.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A. KATHLEEN TOMLINSON, United States Magistrate Judge. I. Preliminary Statement Plaintiff Guadalupe Bosch (“Plaintiff’ or “Bosch”) asserts claims of fraud, breach of contract, conversion, rescission, and seeks a declaratory judgment against Defendant Domenico LaMattina (“LaMattina”) in connection with the sale of Plaintiffs home (the “Subject Property”) to LaMattin

26 P.3d 325 (2001) 2001 WY 58 Courtney J. VAN RIPER, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. Byron OEDEKOVEN, Sheriff of Campbell County, Wyoming; Gregory Bennick, the Administrator of the Campbell County Detention Center; Jackie Tarter, Shift Supervisor at the Campbell County Detention Center, Appellees (Defendants). No. 00-274. Supreme Court of Wyoming. June 20, 200

LEWIS, Judge. Appellant argues that the RICO Act violates the defendantintervenor’s rights under the fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 19 of the Law of the Land Clause of the North Carolina Constitution. Defense counsel at trial did not address the constitutionality of the civil RICO *86statute nor was an objection made on co

678 S.E.2d 618 (2009) STATE of North Carolina v. Ryan Gabriel GARCELL. No. 465A06. Supreme Court of North Carolina. March 20, 2009. *625 Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, and Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defe

The foregoing opinion of BENNICK, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The judgment of the circuit court is, accordingly, affirmed. Hostetter, P.J., and McCullen, J., concur; Becker,J., absent.

JiWICKER, Judge. This appeal arises from a suit to rescind a sale of immovable property and alternatively a reduction in the purchase price. Sheryl LeBlanc wife of/and David Delcambre purchased a house from Janell Faul wife of/and Jerome Lorrain. The Delcambres, plaintiffs/appellants, filed an action in redhibition, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation against the Lorrains, defendants/appellees. They also allege mutual err

The foregoing opinion of BENNICK, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The judgment of the circuit court is, accordingly, affirmed. Hughes, P.J., and McCullen and Anderson, JJ., concur.

The foregoing opinion of BENNICK, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. Appellant's motion for rehearing is, accordingly, overruled. Hughes, P.J., and McCullen and Anderson, JJ., concur. *Page 147

The foregoing opinion of BENNICK, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The judgment of the circuit court is, accordingly, reversed and the cause remanded in accordance with the recommendations of the Commissioner. McCullen, P.J., and Anderson and Hughes, JJ., concur.

The foregoing opinion of BENNICK, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The judgment of the circuit court is, accordingly, reversed and the cause remanded in accordance with the recommendations of the Commissioner. Hughes, P.J., andMcCullen and Anderson, JJ., concur.

The foregoing opinion of BENNICK, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The judgment of the circuit court is, accordingly, affirmed. Haid, P.J., and Becker and Nipper, JJ., concur. REPORTER'S NOTE:- Writ of certiorari in the foregoing case was denied by the Supreme Court, June 3, 1930. *Page 319

The foregoing opinion of BENNICK, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The judgment of the circuit court is, accordingly, reversed and the cause remanded in accordance with the recommendations of the Commissioner. Hughes, P.J., andMcCullen and Anderson, JJ., concur.

The foregoing opinion of BENNICK, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The judgment of the circuit court is, accordingly, reversed and the cause remanded in accordance with the recommendations of the Commissioner. Hughes, P.J., andMcCullen, J., concur; Becker, J., not sitting because absent at time cause was submitted. *Page 987