Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Bernardo-Ramirez”
127 F.3d 829 47 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1335, 97 Cal. Daily Op.Serv. 7879,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,672UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.James Howard OTIS, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jesus MONSALVE, aka Juan; aka Enano; aka Adolpho,Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Arthur Loza ROMO, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STAT
Nery v. United Statespublic domain
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves for summary affirmance of the April 30, 1998 order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting the United States’ motion for summary judgment. Leonardo Nery et al. oppose. Nery et al. served the United States as New Philippine Scouts during and after World War II. Nery et al. filed a civil action
United States v. Cardonapublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1415 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. RAFAEL CARDONA, SR., a/k/a RAFO, Defendant, Appellant. No. 22-1416 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ISAAC CARDONA,
United States v. Otispublic domain
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge, Concurring in part and Dissenting in part. Although I concur in the result in other portions of the majority’s disposition, I vigorously dissent from its holding in Section C that it was not a violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause to sentence defendants Montalvo-Dominquez, Monsalve, Aguilera, *837
United States v. Irurita-Ramirezpublic domain
838 F.Supp. 1385 (1993) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Sylvia IRURITA-RAMIREZ, et al., Defendants. No. CR 92-814(A)-GLT. United States District Court, C.D. California. November 24, 1993. *1386 Thomas P. Sleisenger, Asst. U.S. Atty., Narcotics Section, Los Angeles, CA, for plaintiff. Raymond G. Hernacki, Laguna Bea
United States v. Savagepublic domain
PROCEEDINGS (in chambers): Order Denying Habeas Motion (CV #1 and CR #27) for Lack of Merit; Directing Entry of Separate Final Judgment; Directing Separate Certificate of Appealability Ruling; Terminating and Closing the Civil Case HONORABLE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Represented by counsel, federal prisoner James Lewis Savage (“petitioner”) initiated this action for a wri
United States v. Millerpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO TRANSFER TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Timothy S. Black, United States District Judge This criminal case is before the Court on Defendants’ motions to transfer venue pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 21(b) (Docs. 59, 61) and the parties’ responsive memoranda (Docs. 64, 65, 66). *576</
United States v. Joseph Bernardopublic domain
OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: Joseph Bernardo appeals the district court’s application of a six-point upward adjustment to his offense level for “recklessly creating a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another person.” U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. I
United States v. Rozierpublic domain
598 F.3d 768 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher ROZIER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-17061. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. March 4, 2010. *769 Bernardo Lopez, Fed. Pub. Def., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, Kathleen M. Williams, Fed. Pub. Def., Miami, FL, for Rozier. Lisa A. Hirsch, A
United States v. Renzipublic domain
722 F.Supp.2d 1100 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Richard RENZI, James Sandlin, Andrew Beardall, and Dwayne Lequire, Defendant. No. CR08-212 TUC DCB BPV. United States District Court, D. Arizona. June 4, 2010. *1104 Brian Matthew Heberlig, David Matthew Fragale, Reid Henry Weingarten, Henry Parker Vandyck, Steptoe
United States v. Diaz-Ramirezpublic domain
646 F.3d 653 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Odi Ereldi DIAZ-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ismael Figueroa-Romero, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 10-10230, 10-10231. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 16, 2011. Filed May 23, 2011. <
United States v. Aaron Williamspublic domain
*249 FLAUM, Circuit Judge. In July 2008, Chicago police officers pulled over a Suburban at the request of another Chicago police officer, who was a member of a Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) task force. A subsequent warrantless search of the vehicle, of which defendant-appellant Aaron Williams wa
United States v. Mancinas-Florespublic domain
ORDER The opinion filed on December 2, 2009, is amended as follows: 588 F.3d p. 681, Section II, ¶ 1, line 7. Delete “(en banc)”. 588 F.3d p. 682, ¶ 3, lines 8-9. Delete the parenthetical “, sitting en banc,”. OPINION ADELMAN, District Judge: A Phoenix grand jury indicted defendant Bernardo Man
United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguezpublic domain
530 F.3d 381 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Bernardo RODRIGUEZ-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-41160 Summary Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 9, 2008. *382 Mary Jane Harmon, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee. Marjorie A.
United States v. Duran De Santiagopublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Jose Bernardo Duran De Santiago appeals from the District Court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence following *263an investigatory stop, detention at a gasoline station, and search of his pickup vehicle. We review the denial of a motion to suppress de novo; however, the factual findings made by the trial court (in the
United States v. Duran De Santiagopublic domain
MEMORANDUM *** Jose Bernardo Duran De Santiago appeals from the District Court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence following *263an investigatory stop, detention at a gasoline station, and search of his pickup vehicle. We review the denial of a motion to suppress de novo; however, the factual findings made by the trial court (in the
United States v. Bernardo Mancinas-Florespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 08-10094 v. BERNARDO MANCINAS-FLORES, AKA D.C. No. CR-05-01086-ROS Arturo Morales-Garcia, AKA OPINION Bernardo Mancias-Flores,
United States v. Bernardo Mancinas-Florespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10094 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. BERNARDO MANCINAS-FLORES, AKA CR-05-01086-ROS ORDER AND Arturo Morales-Garcia, AKA AMENDED Bernardo Mancias-Flo
United States v. Carrizales-Toledopublic domain
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge. Jose Roberto Carrizales-Toledo was apprehended near the Mexican border driving a pickup truck containing over 500 pounds of marijuana. During his initial detention, Mr. Carrizales-Toledo made self-incriminating statements to the border patrol agent before and after receiving the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436
United States v. Yuby Ramirez, Jairo Castropublic domain
*1226 PER CURIAM: Yuby Ramirez, Edward Lezcano, and Jairo Castro (collectively the defendants) appeal the life sentences they received after a jury found them guilty of witness tampering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(a)(1)(C). 1 They assert