Cases

Case: 20-40597 Document: 00516110544 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/30/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 30, 2021

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 1 Pages 85–114 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT February 28, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are re

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied. Same case below, 345 Fed. Appx. 790.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. James Bittner appeals from his conviction for kidnapping in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1) (1976). He argues 1) that the district court 1 erred in denying his motion to transfer the case from the Southern District of Iowa to the Northern District

ORDER JOHN E. WAITES, Bankruptcy Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion to Transfer Venue to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division (the “Motion to Transfer Venue”). Based upon the pleadings presented to the Court and the arguments of counsel at the hearing, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

ALGENON L. MARBLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *683This matter is before the court on the defendant Norman Peterson's Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence. (ECF No. 22). For the reasons below, this Court DENIES the Motion to Suppress. I. Background The Columbus Police Departm

[Cite as State v. Bittner, 2012-Ohio-1541.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 97133 and 97134 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE

OPINION STANCEU, Judge: Plaintiff United States Steel Corporation (“U.S. Steel”), a domestic manufacturer of corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products (“CORE”), contests a published decision that the International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or the “Department”) issued in an antidumping duty proceedi

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THOMAS E. BITTNER, No. 85708-8-1 Appellant, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION SYMETRA NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, and JEREMY FREESTONE, an individual, Respondents. FELDMAN, J. — Thomas Bittner sued his former employer, Symetra Life Insurance Company (Symetra), and its Seni

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2021 VT 73

234 P.3d 1012 (2010) 235 Or. App. 554 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lenard Clayton BITTNER, Defendant-Appellant. 072823; A138319. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted October 26, 2009. Decided June 9, 2010. *1013 Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, Appellate Division, and Susan Fai

ORDER James K. Bredar, United States District Judge ' Pending before thé Court is the Government’s Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 96.) The Court has considered it and Defendant Elvin Diaz-Hernandez’s opposition (ECF No. 97). The ‘ Court will grant the motion to extend the deadline from October 6, 2017, until November 6, 2017, for the Government;

759 F.Supp.2d 1349 (2011) UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, and Nucor Corporation, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Union Steel, Posco, Pohang Coated Steel Co., Ltd., and Hyundai Hysco, Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 11-19. Court No. 09-00156. United States Court of International Trade. February 15, 2011.

OPINION & ORDER ALGENON L. MARBLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is a story about law-enforcement officers who take shortcuts in their zeal to make arrests and the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which prohibit them from doing so. The defendant, Martin Ivan Pacheeo-Alvarez, was entitled to Miranda warnings before immigration officers int

675 F.Supp.2d 1313 (2010) UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, and Nucor Corporation, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Hyundai Hysco, Defendant-Intervenor. Slip Op. 10-3. Court No. 08-00131. United States Court of International Trade. January 11, 2010. *1314 Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &

203 P.3d 249 (2009) 226 Or. App. 126 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Robert Jeffery BITTNER, Defendant-Appellant. 990735238, A109428. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on Remand October 28, 2008. Decided February 25, 2009. *250 Louis R. Miles, Deputy Public Defender, Office o

OPINION SMITH, Circuit Judge. Marci J. Bittner appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania granting the motion to dismiss filed by Snyder County and Michael Sholley, the District Attorney of Snyder County.1 For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm. In April of 2007, Patrolman

OPINION SMITH, Circuit Judge. Marci J. Bittner appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania granting the motion to dismiss filed by Snyder County and Michael Sholley, the District Attorney of Snyder County.1 For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm. In April of 2007, Patrolman