Cases

Appellate Case: 23-5064 Document: 67-1 Date Filed: 04/08/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 8, 2025

Appellate Case: 23-2047 Document: 010111106405 Date Filed: 09/05/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 5, 2024

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 14-CF-0667, 14-CF-0712, 14-CF-0724 & 14-CF-1089 LESTER WILLIAMS, II, ROBERT GIVENS, MARCELLUS E. JACKSON, and KEIR MAURICE JOHNSON, APPELLANTS,

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-1582 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Roberto Antwan Williams

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2169 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. BERNARD LINDSEY, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE [Hon. Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge]

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-1874 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANTONIO EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northe

ARTHUR D. SPATT, United States District Judge Presently before the Court is a motion by Larry Carpenter ("Carpenter" or the "Defendant"), pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (" FED. R. CRIM. P. " or "Rule") 41, seeking to suppress all fruits of the search of a cellular phone. For the following reasons, the Defendant's motion is denied in its entirety.

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-4290 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JABRELL CRAIG SMITH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:19-cr-00312-WO-1)

USCA11 Case: 19-13681 Date Filed: 04/22/2021 Page: 1 of 47 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-13681 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00315-LMM-JKL-1 UNITED STATES OF

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0084p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Ap

USCA11 Case: 19-13681 Date Filed: 03/24/2021 Page: 1 of 45 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-13681 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00315-LMM-JKL-1

FILED MAR 2 9 2018 U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS 3Jn tbe Wntteb ~tates q[:ourt of jfeberal q[:Iatms No . 13-307C

OPINION AND ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District ’ Judge; After a 10-day jury trial, Defendant Antoine Chambers was convicted of conspiracy to rob, robbery and kidnapping, and acquitted of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, all violations of the Hobbs Act and the federal Kidnapping Statute, 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 1201, -1951. The Government presented its evidence

USCA11 Case: 19-11239 Date Filed: 02/05/2021 Page: 1 of 35 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-11239 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cr-00190-CEM-TBS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS Hon. Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge Now before the Court is Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Defendant seeks to suppress statements made and cell phone evidence discovered during questioning. The motion is denied. I. Background According to the Complaint, Defendant drove his automobile from Mexico to. the

STAHL, Circuit Judge. This case requires us to decide whether the police, after seizing a cell phone from an individual’s person as part of his lawful arrest, can search the phone’s data without a warrant. We conclude that such a search exceeds the boundaries of the Fourth Amendment search-incident-to-arrest exception. Because the government has not argued that the search here was justified by exigent circumstances or any othe

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-501C (Filed: September 25, 2018) ********************************** ) 3RD EYE SURVEILLANCE, LLC and ) Claims of patent infringement; 28 U.S.C. DISCOVERY PATENTS, LLC, ) § 1498(a); patentability; 35 U.S.C. § 101; ) second step of the Alic

OPINION LINARES, District Judge. Defendant Louis Manzo (“Defendant”) is charged with two counts of travel in interstate commerce to promote, carry on and facilitate bribery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3) and § 2 a misprision of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4. This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendant’s omnibus pretrial motions filed respectively on September 27, 2011 and October

Kravitz, Associate Judge: A Superior Court jury found appellants Floyd K. Long and Alonzo J. Ferrell guilty of conspiracy, armed robbery, and other offenses arising from a series of street robberies committed by masked gunmen operating out of a stolen Dodge Intrepid late on Christmas Eve 2012. Appellants argue that the trial judge erred by failing to suppress a show-up identific

(2008) ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Slip Op. 08-40. Court No. 05-00592. United States Court of International Trade. April 11, 2008. OPINION WALLACH, Judge. I INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff Archer Daniels Midland Company's ("ADM")