Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT SÁNCHEZ, District Judge. Appellant Andre Blackman was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He appeals his conviction, arguing the District Court erred by: (1) denying his motion to vacate the conviction or order a new trial; (2) declining to hold an evidentiary hearing in connection with his suppression motion; (3) ruling in lim

613 S.E.2d 442 (2005) 270 Va. 68 UNITED STATES of America v. Peter F. BLACKMAN. Record No. 042404. Supreme Court of Virginia. June 9, 2005. *443 Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney (John L. Brownlee, United States Attorney; Anthony Conte, on briefs), for plaintiff. David B. Franzen (Mi

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NICKERSON, District Judge: Defendant Rogelio Blackman was found guilty on March 23, 1992 of (1) conspiracy to distribute in excess of five kilograms of cocaine, (2) 5 counts of possession with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine, (3) three counts of using or carrying a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime, and (4) finally being a felon in possession of a firearm.

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge: Attorney Mark Blackman, personally and in his capacity as partner in the law firm of Ransom, Blackman & Weil, appeals the district court’s order granting the petition of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) to enforce a summons served on Blackman pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. §§ 7402(a) and 7604(a) (“I.R.C.” or “the Code”). The IRS seeks information to complete several Int

72 F.3d 1418 77 A.F.T.R.2d 96-313, 64 USLW 2449,96-1 USTC P 50,018,96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 18,96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 20 UNITED STATES of America; Cheryl J. Butcher, IRS RevenueAgent, Petitioners-Appellees,v.Marc D. BLACKMAN, personally and in his representativecapacity as a partner of Rasom, Blackman & Weil,formerly known as Ransom, Blackman &Simson, Respondent-Appellant.</

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Walter Blackman pleaded guilty to one count of distributing a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and the district court ordered him to serve a prison term of 180 months. In this appeal, he challenges the district court’s finding that he was responsible for the uncharged distribution of 3,000 grams of crack cocaine to one of his cust

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge DUNCAN joined. WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: Appellant Khalil Blackman was convicted after a bench trial of two counts stemming from his participation in a series of armed robberies. He now appeals, contending that the e

671 F.2d 504 U. S.v.Blackman 80-4138, 81-4264 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 12/23/81 1 N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine denied.

486 F.2d 1401 *U. S.v.Blackman 73-2865 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit Dec. 11, 1973 1 S.D.Ala. 2 ---------------

OPINION GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge. Frederick Blackman (“Blackman”) petitions for review of the July 20, 2009 final order of removal of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Blackman contends that the BIA abused its discretion in denying his motion to reopen because his motion implicitly requested withdrawal of voluntary departure and his subsequent motions explicitly requested withdrawal of volunt

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff, appearing pro se , filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, alleging that he was falsely arrested, charged with impersonating a police officer, and deprived of his property. The complaint lists the defendants as "U.S. White House, U.S. Secret Service White House Police, Police Officer Adelsperger Badge # 0572" and "Second District Police

HOWARD, Chief Judge. In this case, we must determine whether the Supreme Court’s description of deportation in Padilla v. Kentucky as “an integral part ... of the penalty that may be imposed on noncitizen defendants who plead guilty to specified crimes,” 559 U.S. 356, 364, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), has altered the longstanding notion that remova

Sup. Ct. Ind. Certio-rari denied.

PINE, Chief Judge. This is a motion to suppress evidence seized at the time of defendants’ arrest. They contend that the arrest was illegal, and that the evidence taken should, therefore, be suppressed. On the hearing on the motion to suppress, evidence was taken and the following facts adduced: During December 1959 and January 1960 a series of larcenies had been committed in apartment houses in the area

COFFEY, Circuit Judge. On December 18, 1997, a federal grand jury sitting in the Northern District of Indiana returned a one-count indictment charging Tommy Blackman (“Blackman”) with Failure to Appear, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146(a)(1). On December 17, 1998, Blackman was tried and convicted of Failure to Appear, and was sentenced to 27 months’ imprisonment, two years’ supe

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Judgment PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.