Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Criminal No. 11-00129-2 (CKK) WILLIAM MARTIN BOWMAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 16, 2019) Presently before the Court is Pro Se Defendant William Bowman’s [1011] Motion for Lea

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Criminal No. 11-00129-2 (CKK) Civil No. 17-2182 (CKK) WILLIAM MARTIN BOWMAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION December 3, 2018 Pr

MEMORANDUM *** Scott Michael Bowman appeals his thirty-six month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to obstruction of justice, conversion, falsification of records, and witness tampering. Interpretation of the sentencing guidelines is reviewed de novo, factual findings are reviewed for clear error, and application of the sentencing guidelines to the facts of the

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS TED STEWART, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Dustin Jay Bowman’s Motion to Suppress. The Court held an evidentiary hearing on Defendant’s Motion on May 14, 2014. Thereafter, on August 11, 2014, the Court heard oral argument from the parties. Having considered the evidence presente

PER CURIAM: Ronnie Bowman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) entitled “Independent Action in Equity.* The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

660 F.3d 338 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Kenneth Floyd BOWMAN, Appellant. No. 11-1756. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 21, 2011. Filed: October 28, 2011. *341 Michael Kevin Lahammer, Cedar Rapids, IA, for appellant. Teresa K. Baumann, AUSA, Cedar Rapids,

634 F.3d 357 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan James BOWMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-1068. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: January 19, 2011. Decided and Filed: February 7, 2011. *358 ARGUED: Joseph M. West, Law Office of Joseph M. West, P.C., Ann Arbor, Mi

632 F.3d 906 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frederick Lee BOWMAN, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 09-20563. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 4, 2011. *907 Lauretta Drake Bahry, James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, TX, for U.S. Frederick Lee Bowman, Jr., Tucson, AZ, pro

MEMORANDUM * Bowman’s plea agreement is enforceable, including his waiver of the right to appeal his term of imprisonment and certain conditions of supervised release. The district court’s musings that Bowman’s waiver of the right to appeal might not be enforceable did not render the waiver un*404enforceable. See United States v. Schuman, 1

496 F.3d 685 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Randolph BOWMAN, Appellant. No. 05-3093. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued November 7, 2006. Decided August 7, 2007. *686 Beverly G. Dyer, Assistant Federal Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before DALY, GROSS and de GROOT Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Bryan M. BOWMAN Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps

MEMORANDUM * Bowman appeals his 33-month prison sentence following his guilty plea for possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2), arguing his sentence is unreasonable under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because the district court failed properly to consider the sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553. He al

MEMORANDUM * Bowman appeals his 33-month prison sentence following his guilty plea for possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B) and (b)(2), arguing his sentence is unreasonable under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because the district court failed properly to consider the sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553. He al

MEMORANDUM * The government appeals the district court’s determination that Defendant Kirk Bowman was not eligible for career offender status under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Specifically, the district court determined that Bowman’s 1991 conviction for a violation of California Health & Safety Code § 11351 did not constitute a “controlled substance offense” under section 4B1.2 of the Unit

BARKETT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I believe that under either the “injunction analogy” approach or the collateral order doctrine we have jurisdiction to hear this appeal because the proper remedy for a violation of the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000’s (“CAFRA”) ex parte seizure provision is the return of the property to its owner. Denying the Bowmans possession of their property will res

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 02-4700 RONNIE BOWMAN, a/k/a Young, Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Sh

277 F.Supp.2d 1239 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Harvey Joe BOWMAN, Bobbie Jean Bowman, John Malcolm Hartley, Roger Williams, Darlene Sadi, and Wilfred Jay Cunningham, Defendants. No. CR-03-C-0056-E. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Eastern Division. August 9, 2003. *1240 Randy B Brooks, Brooks Harmon

MEMORANDUM * David Bowman appeals his conviction and sentence for mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Bowman contends that the district court erred in: (1) admitting evidence of his dealings with Capital Preservation Fund (“CPF”); (2) excluding evidence of his attempt to reinsure the investors in The Kentfield Group, LLC (“TKG”); (3) refusing to give his proposed “good faith” jury instruction; (4) i

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 02-4387 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WESLEY BOWMAN, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District

MEMORANDUM ** Steven Bowman appeals his conviction for conspiracy to import marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and possession with intent to distribute marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He argues that the district court erred in denying motions to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a warrantless search. He and his two co-defendants (who were sentenced and appealed earlier) cont