Cases

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 03-22 SHAWN ARNETTE BREEDEN, Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 03-23 KEVIN THOMAS C

950 F.2d 728 U.S.v.Breeden (Wayne Allen) NO. 91-1311 United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. JUL 19, 1991 Appeal From: N.D.Iowa 1 AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Former decision, 134 S.Ct. 1763.Petition for rehearing denied.

Case below, 121 So.3d 918.Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Mississippi denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied. Same case below, 396 U.S. App. D.C. 170, 646 F.3d 43.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

646 F.3d 43 (2011) Mary Kate BREEDEN, Appellant v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Appellee. Nos. 10-7073, 10-7078. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued May 10, 2011. Decided July 8, 2011. *45 Adam Augustine Carter argued the cause for the appellant/cross appellee. R. Scott O

ORDER PER CURIAM: The pro se appellant appeals a December 22, 1997, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) decision that denied educational assistance benefits under chapter 30 of title 38, U.S.Code, for enrollment in a college during the period of August 1995 to May 1996. Record at 2. The appellant has filed an informal brief and a reply, and the Secretary has filed a motion for single-judge affirmance.

ORDER PER CURIAM: On December 14, 2001, the appellant filed a Notice of Appeal as to an August 27, 2001, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA) that remanded the appellant’s claim for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder to a VA regional office for further development and readju-dication. On January 17, 2002, the Secretary file

STEINBERG, Judge: The pro se appellant, veteran George R. Breeden, appeals a December 22, 1997, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision that denied chapter 30 educational assistance benefits for enrollment in a college during the period of August 1995 to May 1996. Record (R.) at 2. The appellant has filed an informal brief and a reply, and the Secretary has filed a moti

WIDENER, Circuit Judge, concurring and dissenting: I concur in the result and in all of the majority opinion except Part III. B. Part III. B decides that the grant of a continuance should be considered separately, is not a final order, and so is not subject to review in this appeal. I agree that the grant or denial of a continuance is o

Cir. Ct. City of Norfolk, Va. Certiorari denied.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Justice Ginsburg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cir. Ct. City of Norfolk, Va. Certiorari denied.

367 B.R. 302 (2007) In re The BENNETT FUNDING GROUP, INC., Debtors. Richard C. Breeden, Trustee of The Bennett Funding Group, Inc., et al., Plaintiff, v. Patrick R. Bennett, Edmund T. Bennett, Kathleen M. Bennett, Michael A. Bennett, Gwen Bennett, Bennett Financial Associates, Bennett Funding of New York, Kenneth P. Kasarjian, Kenton Group, Inc., Charles Genovese, Hemlock Investor Associates, High Mountain Associates, Highwood Investor Associ

MEMORANDUM-DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER AND PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATIONS STEPHEN D. GERLING, Chief Judge. Before the Court are two motions related to the August 29, 1996 Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) filed by Richard C. Breeden, Trustee (“Trustee”) in The Bennett Funding Group, Inc. case. The first is a motion filed on Sept. 28, 2005 by th

532 U.S. 268 (2001) CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BREEDEN No. 00-866. United States Supreme Court. Decided April 23, 2001. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT *270 Per Curiam. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 255, as amended, 42 U. S. C.

ORDER PER CURIAM: On December 14, 2001, the veteran filed a Notice of Appeal (NOA) as to an August 27, 2001, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) remand of his claim for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The Secretary-moves to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the August 2001 Board remand is not a final decision as to any matter. We will grant the