Cases

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Brian James Bronson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2011) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certific

OPINION OF THE COURT De GIULIO, Senior Judge: Appellant was tried by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of a violation of a lawful general regulation and aggravated assault, in violation of Articles 92 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892 and 928 (1988). The military judge sentenced him to confinement for fifteen months, total forfei

Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in Brown v. United States , 586 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 14,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 16-cr-47 (TSC) ) BIANCA BUSH-BRONSON, ) )

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

947 F.2d 937 U.S.v.Bronson (John I., Jr.) NO. 91-3200 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. OCT 04, 1991 1 Appeal From: W.D.Pa. 2 AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 06-4430 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRONSON L. WEBSTER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

530 F.Supp.2d 1172 (2008) Cathryn A. BRONSON, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE,[1] Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 06-4142-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 8, 2008. *1173 *1174 Brandi L. Studer, The Midland Group, Denver, CO, Patrick H. Donahue, M

ORDER MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge: This case is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Oral argument is deemed unnecessary. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and denies plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment. FACTS Plaintiff Phillip Duncan Bronson filed suit on August 15,

Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RICH. Additional Views filed by Circuit Judge NIES. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge MAYER. RICH, Circuit Judge. Phillip Duncan Bronson (Bronson) appeals the August 5, 1993, judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims (CFC) granting the United States’ (government’s) motion for summary judgment and denying Bronson’s cross-motion for summary

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

145 F.2d 939 (1944) UNITED STATES v. BRONSON et al. No. 39. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. December 14, 1944. Robert E. Manley, of New York City, for appellant. Thomas F. Murphy, James B. M. McNally, U. S. Atty., and David Hartfield, *940 Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., all of New York City (Irving J. Galpeer, Atty., Se

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

654 F.2d 728 Bronsonv.U. S. 79-4468 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Ninth Circuit 6/25/81 1 E.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.