⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Byers”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016-08-30 · Published · cited 0× · 668 F. App'x 479
*480Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eric Mario Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to renew his motion of acquittal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Byers, No. 2:02-cr-00077
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012-12-12 · Published · cited 0× · 500 F. App'x 305
PER CURIAM: * Duane Byers appeals his conviction by a jury of one count of possession of more than fifty kilograms of marihuana with intent to distribute. Because Byers’s motion for acquittal preserved the issue, we review the “evidence and the inferences that may be drawn from it in the light most favorable to the verdict” and determine whether “a rational jury could have found the essential ele
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-05-06 · Published · cited 92× · 649 F.3d 197; 2011 WL 1718895
649 F.3d 197 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Albert BYERS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank Keith Goodman, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 09-4439, 09-4677. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: January 28, 2011. Decided: May 6, 2011.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 328 F. App'x 243
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 328 F. App'x 243
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010-01-27 · Published · cited 0× · 363 F. App'x 266
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antonio Demond Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Uni
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010-04-28 · Published · cited 7× · 603 F.3d 503; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8760; 2010 WL 1687774
603 F.3d 503 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Vince BYERS, Appellant. No. 09-1917. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 11, 2010. Filed: April 28, 2010. *504 Nancy McCarthy, AFPD, argued, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Thomas S. Rea, AUSA, argued, St. Louis, MO, fo
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010-01-27 · Published · cited 0× · 363 F. App'x 266
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antonio Demond Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Uni
District Court, D. Maryland · 2009-03-24 · Published · cited 1× · 603 F. Supp. 2d 826; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24898; 2009 WL 764312
603 F.Supp.2d 826 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Patrick Albert BYERS, et al. Criminal No. RDB 08-056. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 24, 2009. *827 John Francis Purcell, Jr., Rod J. Rosenstein, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for United States of America. A. Eduardo Balarezo, Law
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009-04-09 · Published · cited 12× · 561 F.3d 825; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 7441; 2009 WL 938135
561 F.3d 825 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jasen BYERS, Edward D. Robertson, and Johnny D. Guess, Appellants. Nos. 08-2014, 08-2181, 08-2189. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 14, 2009. Filed: April 9, 2009. *826 Laine Cardarella, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Kansas
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008-04-29 · Published · cited 0× · 275 F. App'x 248
PER CURIAM: Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Byers, No. 3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6, 2007 WL 3346715 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequatel
District Court, Virgin Islands · 1998-07-06 · Published · cited 1× · 11 F. Supp. 2d 649; 39 V.I. 315; 1998 WL 384846; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10346
11 F.Supp.2d 649 (1998) UNITED STATES of America and Government of the Virgin Islands, Plaintiffs, v. Reginald Sylvester BYERS, Jr. and Caswell Fredericks, aka "Percy Smith," "Africa" & "Junie Nichols," Defendants. No. CRIM.1992-52. District Court, Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John. July 6, 1998. *650 Sarah
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025-04-07 · Published · cited 0× · 133 F.4th 824
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3751 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Ronald E. Byers; Deanna L. Byers lllll
United States Court of Military Appeals · 1994-09-16 · Published · cited 0× · 40 M.J. 321; 1994 CMA LEXIS 81; 1994 WL 577470
Opinion of the Court GIERKE, Judge: 1. A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant of willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer and wrongful use of cocaine, in violation of Articles 90 and 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 890 and 912a, respectively. The approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 30 d
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995-01-27 · Published · cited 0× · 47 F.3d 426; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 3800; 1995 WL 71341
47 F.3d 426 U.S.v.Byers** NO. 94-60373 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Jan 27, 1995 1 Appeal From: N.D.Miss., No. 3:93-CR-92-S-D 2
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 208; 202 L. Ed. 2d 143
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
U.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 34 M.J. 923; 1992 CMR LEXIS 416; 1992 WL 64484
OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer and wrongful use of cocaine in violation of Articles 90 and 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 890 and 912a (Supp. V 1987) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The approved sentence included a bad-conduct di
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-06-19 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 2286; 198 L. Ed. 2d 716
Petition for rehearing denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-03-27 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 1386; 197 L. Ed. 2d 563
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2014-11-17 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 693; 190 L. Ed. 2d 402; 83 U.S.L.W. 3305; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 7718
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.