Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “United States v. Byers”
United States v. Byerspublic domain
*480Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eric Mario Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to renew his motion of acquittal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Byers, No. 2:02-cr-00077
United States v. Byerspublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Duane Byers appeals his conviction by a jury of one count of possession of more than fifty kilograms of marihuana with intent to distribute. Because Byers’s motion for acquittal preserved the issue, we review the “evidence and the inferences that may be drawn from it in the light most favorable to the verdict” and determine whether “a rational jury could have found the essential ele
United States v. Byerspublic domain
649 F.3d 197 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick Albert BYERS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank Keith Goodman, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 09-4439, 09-4677. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: January 28, 2011. Decided: May 6, 2011.
United States v. Byerspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Byerspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Byerspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antonio Demond Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Uni
United States v. Byerspublic domain
603 F.3d 503 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Vince BYERS, Appellant. No. 09-1917. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 11, 2010. Filed: April 28, 2010. *504 Nancy McCarthy, AFPD, argued, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Thomas S. Rea, AUSA, argued, St. Louis, MO, fo
United States v. Byerspublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Antonio Demond Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Uni
United States v. Byerspublic domain
603 F.Supp.2d 826 (2009) UNITED STATES of America v. Patrick Albert BYERS, et al. Criminal No. RDB 08-056. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 24, 2009. *827 John Francis Purcell, Jr., Rod J. Rosenstein, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, MD, for United States of America. A. Eduardo Balarezo, Law
United States v. Byerspublic domain
561 F.3d 825 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Jasen BYERS, Edward D. Robertson, and Johnny D. Guess, Appellants. Nos. 08-2014, 08-2181, 08-2189. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: January 14, 2009. Filed: April 9, 2009. *826 Laine Cardarella, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Kansas
United States v. Byerspublic domain
PER CURIAM: Jaylar Tassmall Byers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Byers, No. 3:00-cr-00137-FDW-6, 2007 WL 3346715 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 5, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequatel
United States v. Byerspublic domain
11 F.Supp.2d 649 (1998) UNITED STATES of America and Government of the Virgin Islands, Plaintiffs, v. Reginald Sylvester BYERS, Jr. and Caswell Fredericks, aka "Percy Smith," "Africa" & "Junie Nichols," Defendants. No. CRIM.1992-52. District Court, Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John. July 6, 1998. *650 Sarah
United States v. Ronald Byerspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-3751 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Ronald E. Byers; Deanna L. Byers lllll
United States v. Byerspublic domain
Opinion of the Court GIERKE, Judge: 1. A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant of willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer and wrongful use of cocaine, in violation of Articles 90 and 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 890 and 912a, respectively. The approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 30 d
United States v. Byerspublic domain
47 F.3d 426 U.S.v.Byers** NO. 94-60373 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. Jan 27, 1995 1 Appeal From: N.D.Miss., No. 3:93-CR-92-S-D 2
Byers v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
United States v. Byerspublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members of willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer and wrongful use of cocaine in violation of Articles 90 and 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 890 and 912a (Supp. V 1987) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The approved sentence included a bad-conduct di
Byers v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for rehearing denied.
Byers v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Byers v. United Statespublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.