Cases

571 F.2d 583 U. S.v.Camel No. 77-5270 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit 2/15/78 1 E.D.Mich. AFFIRMED

Slip Op. 26-95 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CAMEL GROUP CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION; FORCED LABOR Before: Lisa W. Wang, Judge ENFORCEMENT TASK FORCE; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in his official Court No. 25-0

686 F.Supp. 912 (1988) CAMEL MANUFACTURING CO., Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant. Court No. 77-7-01147. United States Court of International Trade. May 18, 1988. Stein, Shostak, Shostak & O'Hara, Robert Glenn White, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff. John R. Bolton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. T

BISSELL, Circuit Judge. The judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, see 686 F.Supp. 912 (1988), sustaining the United States Customs Service’s (Customs) classification of certain imported nylon tents under item 389.60 of Schedule 3, Part 7, Subpart B of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), is affirmed.

The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.

Opinion NICHOLSON, Acting P. J. —Defendant Percy Lamonte Camel killed two men in separate criminal incidents. Convicted of two counts of first degree murder and other crimes and sentenced to two consecutive indeterminate terms of life without the possibility of parole and other terms, he appeals. Defendant contends that the trial cour

PER CURIAM: The Government appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York (John T. Cur-tin, Judge) that granted the motions of Patrick Mire and Andre Camel (“defendants”) to suppress evidence of illegal drugs possessed by the defendants and statements made by them regarding such possession. The district judge referred the matter to

Kunzig, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: These renegotiation cases come before the court on defendant’s exceptions to the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended opinion issued by Trial Judge Louis Spector on November 18, 1976, in accordance with Rule 134(h), in which he held that Camel Manufacturing Company (Camel or plaintiff) had realized no excessive profits during the fiscal

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

537 U.S. 1001 SAKS FIFTH AVENUE ET AL.v.CASHMERE & CAMEL HAIR MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTE ET AL. No. 02-279. Supreme Court of United States. November 4, 2002. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.

536 U.S. 990 GALLEGOSv.PUEBLO OF TESUQUE, DBA CAMEL ROCK GAMING CENTER, ET AL. No. 02-5574. Supreme Court of the United States. October 3, 2002. 1 Sup. Ct. N. M. Certiorari dismissed under this Court's Rule 46. Reported below: 132 N. M. 207, 46 P. 3d 668.

LYNCH, Chief Judge. This appeal arises from a discovery dispute in litigation between two yarn manufacturers, Cascade Yarns, Inc. (“Cascade”) and Knitting Fever, Inc. (“KFI”), in the Western District of Washington. Cascade, the plaintiff in the Washington action, accused KFI of making false representations about the cashmere content of its yarns. The recipi

SUMMARY ORDER Bruce makes four arguments on appeal: (1) that the trial court’s sanction of the defense under Fed.R.Crim.P. 16 for the untimely disclosure of an original certificate of sale, by excluding the certificate but not the envelope in which it was enclosed, was an abuse of discretion, rendering the trial unfair; (2) that the trial court erroneously allowed New York City Police Detective Richard Addona, the case officer, to proff

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HOLIFIELD, GROSS, and BLOSSER Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellant v. Kyle A. SHELBY Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-1894L Filed: May 2, 2023 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * ELIZABETH ORR, et al., * * * Plaintiffs, * * v.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 00-2341 CASHMERE & CAMEL HAIR MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTE, F/K/A CAMEL HAIR & CASHMERE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC., AND L.W. PACKARD & CO., INC., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, HARVE BENARD, LTD. AND FILENES BASEMENT, Defendants, Appellee

18-3074-cr(L) U.S. v. Hunter et al. In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2021 Nos. 18-3074-cr (L), 18-3489 (CON), 19-790 (CON) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. JOSEPH MANUEL HUNTER, AKA SEALED DEFENDANT 1, AKA FRANK ROBINSON, AKA JIM RI

851 F.Supp. 96 (1994) UNITED STATES of America v. Patrick MIRE, and Andre Camel a/k/a Andre Campbell, Defendants. No. 93-CR-131C. United States District Court, W.D. New York. May 3, 1994. *97 *98 Patrick H. NeMoyer, U.S. Atty. (Thomas S. Duszkiewicz, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel), Buffalo, NY,

Elizabeth Perry I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Cite as 2022 Ark. App. 59 2023.08.22 11:21:09 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS -05'00' DIVISION I 2023.003.2026 No. CV-19-686 9 ELAINE PETROLEUM DISTRIBUTOR, Opinion Delivered February 9, 2022 INC., AND QINGDAO XIYINGMEN DOUBLE CAMEL TYRE CO., LTD. APPELLANTS/CROSS