Cases

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Case: 24-20045 Document: 123-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/25/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 24-20045 November 25, 2025

616 F.2d 1062 Christopher W. CAREAGA, Appellant,v.Judge Harry M. JAMES, the People of the City of St. Louis,Missouri a Municipal Corporation, by Alphonso J. Cervantesand Jim Conway, authorized agents of the City of St. Louis,Collectively in their Official Capacity, Appellees. No. 79-1723. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted March

PER CURIAM. This pro se civil rights suit was brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by plaintiff, a Missouri state inmate, against Judge Harry M. James and the people of St. Louis. Plaintiff, who plead guilty to four felony charges in 1971, alleged in substance that after he plead guilty, Judge James, then presiding in the circuit court of the State of Missouri, expressed regret that he was legally barred from imposing a de

PER CURIAM. The plaintiff, Robert Sanders, appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal of his pro se complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1982). We affirm. I. Facts The plaintiff was senten

PETERS, J. I dissent. The majority opinion correctly states the facts, and correctly states that the only question involved is whether “the error in the order for preliminary distribution signed on July 7, 1954” was “a clerical or a judicial error.” The opinion answers that question by holding that the error was clerical, and therefore subject to correction by a nunc pro tunc order made years after it h

GILBERT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). The principal question which the writ of error brings to our attention is whether or not the plaintiff in error has been engaged in interstate commerce by railroad, within the safety appliance act of Congress of March 2, 1893 (27 Stat. 531, c. 196 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3174]), and the amendment thereto of March 2, 1903 (32 Stat. 943, c. 976 [ Ü. S. Comp. St. Supp. 19

KHOUZAM, Judge. Julio C. Rodriguez-Giudicelli appeals his judgment and sentence for first-degree premeditated murder. We affirm in all respects. We write to address Rodriguez-Giudieelli’s argument that the trial court reversibly erred when it applied the doctrine of statutory revival and sentenced *948him to life in prison with parole eligibility-after twenty-five yea

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 05-579V (To be published) ***************************** * Special Master Corcoran HOLLY AUSTIN, parent of K.A., a minor, * * Filed: May 15, 2018

Opinion FYBEL, Acting P. J. INTRODUCTION A fundamental principle of California law, enshrined in the State Bar Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6000 et seq.), is that no person may “practice law in California” unless that person is an active member of the State Bar. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6125 (section 6125).) As a corollary pri

USCA11 Case: 24-13266 Document: 91-1 Date Filed: 01/21/2026 Page: 1 of 21 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-13266 ____________________ In re: THE RENCO GROUP INC. AND THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION. __

816 So.2d 140 (2002) Miriam Nancy FERREIRO, Appellant, v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 3D01-2365. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. April 3, 2002. Rehearing and Certification Denied May 29, 2002. Victor Careaga; Angones, Hunter, McClure, Lynch, Williams & Garcia and Steve Hunter and Christopher Lynch

Memorandum and Order RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge: Plaintiffs1 bring this suit against a collection of corporate and individual Defendants, alleging violations of §§ 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 77k, 77Z(a)(2) & 77o, and New York common law in connection with the sale of a number of residential mortgage-backed

314 S.W.3d 882 (2010) Timothy Darnell FLOWERS v. BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY. No. W2008-02648-SC-R3-CV. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Jackson. November 5, 2009 Session. June 4, 2010. *884 Samuel J. Muldavin, Memphis, Tennessee, for the appellant, Timothy Darnell Flowers. Krisann Hodges, Disciplin

427 F.Supp.2d 737 (2006) Fermin COLINDRES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. QUIETFLEX MANUFACTURING, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A. H-01-4319, CIV.A. H-01-4323. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 31, 2006. *738 *739 David G. Hinojosa, David Herrera Urias, Nina Perales, Ma

967 S.W.2d 234 (1998) STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Joe THEUS, Appellant. Nos. WD 51810, WD 53731. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 24, 1998. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Denied April 28, 1998. Application for Transfer Denied June 16, 1998. *235 Rosemary E. Perciv

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge. Plaintiff, Terry Quaschnick, brought this action for damages against defendants, the state of Minnesota, Robert Borner, the city of Chaska, and William Noll, seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of his constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of the laws and alleging negligent assault and battery. Jurisdiction i

REINHARD, Judge. Movant appeals from an order denying his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm. Pursuant to a guilty plea agreement, movant pled guilty on March 6, 1986, to two counts of first-degree sexual abuse and separate counts of sodomy and rape. The victims were movant’s five- and six-year-old nieces. Under the plea agreement the state dismissed one sodomy count and one rape

748 F.Supp.2d 1246 (2010) BOILERMAKERS NATIONAL ANNUITY TRUST FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. WAMU MORTGAGE PASS TRHOUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES AR1, et al., Defendants. Case No. C09-00037MJP. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. September 28, 2010. *1249 Christopher E

255 F.Supp.2d 1304 (2002) Sherry MORELAND, Plaintiff, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Defendant. No. 02-20082-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. November 13, 2002. *1307 Donna Marie Ballman, Davie, FL, for Sherry Moreland, plaintiff. William X. Candela, FTS, Dade County Attorney's Office, Miami, FL, for Miami-Dade Coun