Cases

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201800126 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. Jae P. CHO Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellan

MEMORANDUM * Defendant Cho-Ing (Bruno) Tseng appeals his conviction for wire fraud in connection with his alleged kidnaping in Venezuela. We affirm. 1. The Confrontation Clause argument was not preserved, so we review for plain error. United States v. Jawara, 474 F.3d 565, 583 (9th Cir.2007). There was no plain error in allowing the minimal hearsay testimony from Agent Cordero, be

MEMORANDUM * Defendant Cho-Ing (Bruno) Tseng appeals his conviction for wire fraud in connection with his alleged kidnaping in Venezuela. We affirm. 1. The Confrontation Clause argument was not preserved, so we review for plain error. United States v. Jawara, 474 F.3d 565, 583 (9th Cir.2007). There was no plain error in allowing the minimal hearsay testimony from Agent Cordero, be

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge: Chong Cho (“Cho”) appeals her sentence after pleading guilty to two counts of trafficking in counterfeit goods. She contends that the district court erred in applying United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) §§ 2B5.3 and 2F1.1 to calculate her sentence. For the following reasons, we find no error in th

PER CURIAM: Defendant-appellant Mi Sun Cho was convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kimba M. Wood, Judge) of one count of conspiring to violate sex trafficking laws in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2422 and two substantive sex trafficking counts in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2. Cho raises

SUMMARY ORDER Appellant Cho appeals from a judgment of conviction following her plea of guilty to one count of bank fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344. Her sole challenge is to the district court’s order of restitution in the amount of $49,600. Cho attempted to make restitution in full prior to the entry of the district court’s judgment and, based on her belief that she was successful, sought for the judgm

SUMMARY ORDER Appellant Cho appeals from a judgment of conviction following her plea of guilty to one count of bank fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344. Her sole challenge is to the district court’s order of restitution in the amount of $49,600. Cho attempted to make restitution in full prior to the entry of the district court’s judgment and, based on her belief that she was successful, sought for the judgm

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

(2008) CALVIN K. CHO, ET AL. v. HAWAII No. 07-821 Supreme Court of United States. February 19, 2008. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

MANSFIELD, District Judge: After trial before Judge Frankel, sitting without a jury, appellant was found guilty of assaulting and interfering with a Federal Immigration Officer in violation of Title 18, U.S.Code, § 111. 1 Upon this appeal appellant contends for the first time that the Government failed to establish that a

437 F.Supp.2d 557 (2006) Terence CALLAHAN, Sr., Plaintiff, v. Kenneth CHO, M.D. and Veterans Administration/Veterans Administration Medical Center and United States of America, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:05cv1243. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. July 6, 2006. *558 Andrew M. Steinberg,

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, an alien who marries a United States citizen is entitled to petition for permanent residency on a conditional basis. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1151(b)(2)(A)(i), 1154(a)(1)(A)® & (ii), and 1186a(a)(l). Within 90 days of the second anniversary of the conditional admission, the couple (if the citizen is

Sup. Ct. Haw. Certiorari denied.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: This is a consolidated appeal by four youths initially sentenced under the Feder*1262al Youth Corrections Act (YCA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 5005-26 (1982), whose sentences were changed to adult sentences of various lengths. In each case, the youth offender had initially received a split YCA sentence — each was sentenced to YCA treatment for an indet

164 B.R. 730 (1994) In re Thomas Hee CHO and Kil Ja Cho, Debtors. Samuel W. STEELE and Carol J. Steele, Plaintiffs, v. Thomas Hee CHO and Kil Ja Cho, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 93-31608-S. Contested Matter No. 93-972. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 4, 1994. *731 Gary M. Nuckols, Dur

Filed 7/10/25; Modified & Certified for Partial Publication 7/28/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE MICHAEL K., Plaintiff and Respondent, A169917 v. JANICE CHO, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. 23CV038554)

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ORDER SUSTAINING OBJECTION TO DISCHARGE NANCY V. ALQUIST, Bankruptcy Judge. Seung Chan Park (“Mr. Park” or the “Debtor”) filed a petition for relief under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) on October 26, 2009. Charles Goldstein was appointed the chapter 7 trustee (the “Chapter 7 Trustee” or “Mr. Goldstein”) in Mr. Park’s chapter 7 case

278 B.R. 844 (2002) In re Chai Cho OH, Debtor. Merchants Bank of California, a National Banking Association, Plaintiff, v. Chai Cho Oh, also known as Samuel Chai Cho Oh, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. LA 01-23689-BB. Adversary No. LA 01-01949-BB. United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California. June 7, 2002. *845