Cases

Case: 23-40625 Document: 100-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-40625

CCA S31871. Review granted on the following issue: WHERE A SPECIFICATION CHARGED UNDER ARTICLE 134, UCMJ, FAILS TO STATE AN OFFENSE UNDER UNITED STATES v. FOSLER, 70 M.J. 225 (C.A.A.F. 2011), BY NOT INCLUDING THE TERMINAL ELEMENTS FOR CLAUSE 1 OR 2, CAN AN ACCUSED PROVIDENTLY PLEAD GUILTY TO SUCH A SPECIFICATION WHERE HE FAILS TO OBJECT TO THE SPECIFICATION AT TRIAL, WHERE THE MILITARY JUDGE ADVISES THE ACCUSED OF THE TER

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Mark Allen Cisneros has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cisneros has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Cisneros’ response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Mark Allen Cisneros has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Cisneros has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Cisneros’ response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel

656 F.3d 1015 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo CISNEROS-RESENDIZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-50521. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 15, 2011. Filed September 6, 2011. *1016 Douglas Keehn, Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for appellee

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Arturo Cisneros-Ramirez appeals from the 240-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute 50 grams and more of methamphetamine and for laundering monetary instruments, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Cisneros-Ramirez co

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Javier Cisneros raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir.2007),

MEMORANDUM ** Jose Arturo Cisneros-Ramirez appeals from the 240-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute 50 grams and more of methamphetamine and for laundering monetary instruments, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Cisneros-Ramirez co

598 F.3d 997 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Alfonso CISNEROS-GUTIERREZ, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Gerardo Cisneros-Gutierrez, Appellant. *998 United States of America, Appellee, v. Alfredo Cisneros-Gutierrez, Appellant. Nos. 09-1890, 09-2590, 09-2728. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.<

456 F.Supp.2d 826 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. Dora CISNEROS. Civil No. B-02-191. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division. September 28, 2006. *827 *828 *829 *830

MEMORANDUM * The search warrant in this case was not overbroad or insufficiently particular. We need not decide whether there was good cause for conducting the search at night because the officers reasonably relied on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate. The district court erred in treating the federal Sentencing Guidelines as mandatory. Therefore, we affirm Cisneros’s conviction and rema

397 F.Supp.2d 726 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Ismael Juarez CISNEROS, Defendant. No. CRIM.A. 04-283. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. July 21, 2005. *727 Patricia Giles, Ronald Walutes, Assistant United States Attorneys, United States Attorneys Office, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff's Attorn

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 04-10576 BENJAMIN AUSTIN; FELIPE CISNEROS;  D.C. No. CR-03-00730-ROS LORENA CISNEROS; LUIS CISNEROS; PAUL EPPINGER; RAYMOND LLAMAS; OPINION ANGEL RIVERA; RICHARD TRUJILLO, Defendants-Appellants.

363 F.Supp.2d 827 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, v. Ismael Juarez CISNEROS, Defendant. No. CRIM.A. 04-328. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia. Alexandria Division. March 24, 2005. *828 *829 Ronald Walutes, Esquire, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, P

385 F.Supp.2d 567 (2005) UNITED STATES of America v. Ismael Juarez CISNEROS, Defendant. No. CRIM.A. 04-283. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. August 24, 2005. *568 Ronald L. Walutes, Jr. Esquire, Patriica Giles, Esquire, United States Attorney's Office, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff. James C

517 F.3d 751 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Osvaldo CISNEROS-GUTIERREZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 06-11156. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 13, 2008. *752 *753 *754 *755 Su

MEMORANDUM ** In these consolidated appeals, Fidel Cisneros-Gonzalez appeals from his 30-month sentence, imposed following his guilty plea to being an alien found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and from his consecutive 21-month sentence, imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Cisneros-Colchado raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance, is GRA

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oscar Daniel Cisneros-Lopez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance

EBEL, Circuit Judge. Lorena Cisneros appeals an order of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico upholding the determination by a magistrate judge of that court that Cisneros be detained pending trial. By ordering her detention pending trial, the New Mexico district court revoked a prior order of a federal magistrate judge in Arizona that had permitted Ci