⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Clark”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025-08-21 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 24-60531 Document: 99-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-60531 FILED
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-12-05 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. No. 21-cr-00538 (DLF) JACOB TRAVIS CLARK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is the defendant’s Motion for Pretrial Release, Dkt. 108, and the government’s Motion for Pretrial D
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-09-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) ) Criminal No. 10-0133 (PLF) FLOYD CLARK, ) Civil Action No. 15-0493 (PLF)
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022-09-28 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 14, 2022 No. 17-11079 Lyl
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-12-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) ) Criminal No. 10-0133 (PLF) FLOYD CLARK, ) ) Defendant. ) ) OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Floyd Clark has filed a Motion for Compassionate Release (“Def. Mot.”) [Dkt. No. 168]. Mr. Clark seeks a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) because, he contends, he is at risk of serious illness or death if he contracts the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) and he has been substantially
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021-03-04 · Published · cited 3× · 990 F.3d 404
Case: 19-10186 Document: 00515766518 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 4, 2021
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023-01-06 · Published · cited 0× · 56 F.4th 1314
USCA11 Case: 21-10809 Document: 67-1 Date Filed: 01/06/2023 Page: 1 of 19 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-10809 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023-03-13 · Published · cited 1× · 61 F.4th 1306
USCA11 Case: 21-10809 Document: 74-1 Date Filed: 03/13/2023 Page: 1 of 19 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-10809 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020-11-17 · Published · cited 0× · 980 F.3d 746
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 17, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020-12-09 · Published · cited 14× · 981 F.3d 1154
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS December 9, 2020 Christopher M. Wolpert
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020-06-29 · Published · cited 0×
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before KING, STEWART, and GEIS Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Derick D. CLARK Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corp
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2020-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Norman L. CLARK Sr., Sergeant United States Army, Appellant No. 19-0411 Crim. App. No. 20170023 Argued February 11, 2020—Decided April 22, 2020 Military Judge: Matthew A.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-03-05 · Published · cited 1× · 94 F.4th 130
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 9, 2023 Decided March 5, 2024 No. 21-3057 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. CLARK CALLOWAY, JR., APPELLANT Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:17-cr-0008
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF Al\/[ERICA ) ) v. ) CriminalNo. 10-0133 (PLF) ) Civil Action. No. 15-0493 (PLF) FLOYD CLARK, ) ) Defendant. ) ) OPINION This matter is before the Court on defendant Floyd Clark’s motion [Dkt. No. 114] to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 225 5, as amended by the supplement to defendant’s motion [Dkt. No. 132]. The United States opposes the motion. Upon careful consideration of the part
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019-04-22 · Published · cited 17× · 382 F. Supp. 3d 1
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on defendant Floyd Clark's motion [Dkt. No. 114] to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as amended by the supplement to defendant's motion [Dkt. No. 132]. The United States opposes the motion. Upon careful
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-09-16 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 10-0133 (PLF) ) Civil Action No. 15-0493 (PLF) FLOYD CLARK, )
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-09-18 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 10-0133 (PLF) ) FLOYD CLARK, ) ) Defendant. )
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-09-18 · Published · cited 0× · 325 F. Supp. 3d 191
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge The matter is before the Court on the motion [Dkt. No. 128] of defendant Floyd Clark to admit hearsay in support of his separate motion to vacate, set aside, or *192correct his sentence under 28 U.S.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018-01-03 · Published · cited 7× · 879 F.3d 1
STAHL, Circuit Judge. Joseph Clark appeals from the district court’s- denial of his motion to suppress drug evidence found on his person during a traffic stop. Clark claims that after Officer Christopher McGoon stopped a vehicle in which Clark was a passenger for a traffic violation, McGoon unreasonably extended the duration of the traffic stop and thereby vi
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2017-07-20 · Published · cited 1× · 266 F. Supp. 3d 573
OPINION AND ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief United States District Judge I. Introduction and procedural history By an Indictment, dated September 8, 2016, a federal Grand Jury has charged defendants-Miehael Clark, Cedrick Walton, David Mallard Thomas, and John Benn with conspiracy to possess marihuana with intent to distribute on board a vessel without nationality, 46 U.S.C. §§. 70503(