⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Clausell”

Clausell v. Sherrerpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2010-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 562 U.S. 871
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Clausell v. Sherrerpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2010-10-04 · Published · cited 0× · 178 L. Ed. 2d 103; 2010 U.S. LEXIS 7069; 131 S. Ct. 172; 562 U.S. 871; 79 U.S.L.W. 3199
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied. Same case below, 594 F.3d 191.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-02-16 · Published · cited 0×
02/16/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 24, 2023 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KARLA MARIE CLAUSELL Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bradley County No. 20-CR-304 Sandra N.C. Donaghy, Judge ___________________________________
Supreme Court of the United States · 1988-04-18 · Published · cited 1× · 485 U.S. 1000; 108 S. Ct. 1459; 56 U.S.L.W. 3717; 99 L. Ed. 2d 690; 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1818
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Fla. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating *1001the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
Clausell v. Sherrerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010-03-23 · Published · cited 0×
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 06-4606 JAMES DOUGLAS CLAUSELL, Petitioner, v. LYDELL SHERRER; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ANNE MILGRAM*
Supreme Court of the United States · 1970-03-02 · Published · cited 0× · 397 U.S. 966
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1988-04-18 · Published · cited 0× · 485 U.S. 1000
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Fla. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating *1001the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
Clausell v. Sherrerpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010-02-05 · Published · cited 5× · 594 F.3d 191; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 2493; 2010 WL 395902
AMBRO, Circuit Judge, concurring. I agree with my colleagues that Clausell has forfeited his substantive Batson claim by failing to raise a contemporaneous objection at trial. Abu-Jamal v. Horn, 520 F.3d 272 (3d Cir.2008), vacated on other grounds sub nom. Beard v. Abu-Jamal, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1134, — L.Ed.2d *198-, 2010
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968-01-17 · Published · cited 7× · 389 F.2d 34; 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8376
PER CURIAM: On March 10, 1967 the jury returned verdicts of guilty on both counts of an indictment charging the appellant with selling heroin hydrochloride in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 173 and § 174. On April 18, 1967 he was sentenced to six years imprisonment on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. On this appeal, appellant
Clausell v. Statepublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2005-02-15 · Published · cited 32× · 2005 MT 33; 326 Mont. 63; 106 P.3d 1175; 2005 Mont. LEXIS 37
2005 MT 33 AMUIR SEKOU CLAUSELL, Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Respondent and Respondent. No. 04-175 Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs: January 19, 2005 Decided: February 15, 2005 For Appellant: Chad Wright, Appellate Defender Office, Helena, Montana. For Respondent: Hon. Mike McGrath, Attorney General; C. Mark Fo
State v. Clausellpublic domain
Montana Supreme Court · 2001-04-18 · Published · cited 33× · 2001 MT 62; 22 P.3d 1111; 305 Mont. 1; 2001 Mont. LEXIS 75
22 P.3d 1111 (2001) 2001 MT 62 STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Amuir Sekou CLAUSELL, Defendant and Appellant. No. 98-213. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs March 16, 2000. Decided April 18, 2001. *1113 Kevin Gillen, Billings, for Appellant. Joseph P. Mazur
People v. Clausellpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992-08-31 · Published · cited 12× · 182 A.D.2d 132; 587 N.Y.S.2d 672; 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10338
OPINION OF THE COURT Lawrence, J. The question to be decided on this appeal is whether the defendant is entitled to a new trial on the ground that the prosecution violated his right to due process by withholding specifically requested Brady material from the defense (see, Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83). In our view, this question must be answered in the affirmative. In
State v. Clausellpublic domain
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990-08-30 · Published · cited 133× · 580 A.2d 221; 121 N.J. 298; 1990 N.J. LEXIS 149
HANDLER, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. Defendant, James Clausell, was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. He was also convicted of three counts of aggravated assault and related weapons offenses. Defendant appealed his capital conviction to this Court as of right. R. 2:2-1(a)(3). The Court now reverses the capital-murder and derivative
Supreme Court of Florida · 1987-12-03 · Published · cited 36× · 515 So. 2d 1275; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 591; 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2544; 1987 WL 2364
515 So.2d 1275 (1987) Alberto CLAUSELL, et al., Petitioners, v. HOBART CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 70566. Supreme Court of Florida. December 3, 1987. Joel S. Perwin of Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A., and Spence, Payne, Masington, Grossman & Needle, P.A., Miami, for petitioners. James E. Tribble and Anthony D. Dwyer of
Clausell v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984-09-18 · Published · cited 7× · 455 So. 2d 1050
455 So.2d 1050 (1984) Jose CLAUSELL, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 83-2522. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 13, 1984. On Motion for Rehearing September 18, 1984. *1051 Pelzner, Schwedock, Finkelstein & Klausner and Robert D. Klausner and Lori E. Barrist, Miami
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987-05-12 · Published · cited 4× · 506 So. 2d 1160; 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1224
506 So.2d 1160 (1987) Alberto CLAUSELL and Patricia Clausell, Appellants, v. HOBART CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 86-924. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 12, 1987. Spence, Payne, Masington, Grossman & Needle, Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin and Joel S. Perwin, Miami, for appellants. Blackwell, Walker, Fa
State v. Clausellpublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida · 1985-08-22 · Published · cited 17× · 474 So. 2d 1189; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 409
474 So.2d 1189 (1985) STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Jose CLAUSELL, Respondent. No. 65945. Supreme Court of Florida. August 22, 1985. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner. Lori E. Barrist of Pelzner, Schwedock, Finkelstein and Klausner, Miami, for respondent. OVERTON, Justice. This is a petitio
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2010-09-30 · Published · cited 2× · 745 F. Supp. 2d 1274; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110437; 2010 WL 3893750
745 F.Supp.2d 1274 (2010) M.D., a Minor, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Case No. 8:09-cv-438-EAK-MAP. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. September 30, 2010. *1275 Theodore Stanley Forman, Forman Law Offices, PA, Delray Beach, FL, for Plaintiffs. Sean Flynn, U.S. Attorne
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013-12-12 · Published · cited 31× · 80 A.3d 978; 2013 WL 6500221; 2013 D.C. App. LEXIS 796
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge: Appellants Azariah Israel and Emanuel Jenkins were tried together before a jury for murders and other serious crimes committed in 2005 and 2006. The jury found Israel guilty on two counts of armed first-degree murder, three counts of armed assault with intent to kill, and related firearms charges, all in connection with a shooting of several individu
Clausell v. Turnerpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 1969-01-21 · Published · cited 4× · 295 F. Supp. 533; 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8333
OPINION HERLANDS, District Judge: A fundamental issue of far-ranging importance raised by defendant Rooney’s motion to dismiss the complaint in this declaratory judgment action is whether the validity of plaintiff’s incarceration following trial, conviction and sentence can be collaterally attacked in a proceeding under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 et seq. (1964), or whether, under the c