Cases

Clevenger, Circuit Judge. *1377 Members of the Alimanestianu family ("Appellants"), who are U.S. nationals, appeal the final decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims ("the trial court"), which denied their claim that the United States Government committed a taking of their pr

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Joseph F. Bianco, District Judge: On July 9, 2015, following a nine-week trial, a jury convicted -defendant Phillip Kenner (“Kenner”) of one count of conspiring to commit,wire-fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (Count One of the superseding indictment); four counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2 (Counts Two, Three, Four,

Prost, Chief Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Dewayne F. Adams et al. (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal from the order of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Claims Court”) granting the government’s partial motion to dismiss pursuant to Court of Federal Claims Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth in the thorough and well-reasoned

GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge: Defendant-Appellant Tatyana Gabinska-ya appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered on March 3, 2015, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (J. Paul Oetken, /.), following a two-week jury trial. Gabinska-ya was found guilty of conspiracy to commit health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347, conspir

PER CURIAM: Defendant Emmanuel Roy appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered on December 10, 2013, by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Griesa, /.), following a jury trial in which Roy was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, three counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and b

Post-award bid protest; Past performance; Unstated evaluation criteria; Inadequate discussions; Best value tradeoff. OPINION Eric G. Bruggink, Senior Judge This is a post-award bid protest by Supply-Core Inc. challenging the Air Force’s award of a services contract for supply logistics, maintenance, and other analytical or technica

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of the district court is AFFIRMED. Phillip A. Kenner appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to be released on bond pending trial on an indictment for mail fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering. 18 U.S.C.- §§ 1343, 1349, 1956. We have considered Kenner’s arguments and affirm the denia

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Vincent Constantine Hutchins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s 2009 order denying relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012). The order is not ap-pealable unless a circui

Case below, 519 Fed.Appx. 980.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

ORDER Constantin Palanceanu was among several defendants charged in relation to an Internet fraud scheme. He pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud and was sentenced to thirty months’ imprisonment. Pa-lanceanu filed a timely notice of appeal, but his appointed counsel has moved to withdraw, having concluded that an appeal would be frivolous. Counsel’s motion is supported by a brief filed pursuant to An-ders v. California,

674 F.3d 985 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael James CONSTANTINE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-1958. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: October 20, 2011. Filed: March 26, 2012. *987 Thomas Harold Shiah, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant. Allen A. Slaughter,

ORDER Appellee, United States of America, filed a petition for panel rehearing, or, in the alternative, for rehearing en banc. The panel that determined the appeal has considered the request for panel rehearing, and the active members of the Court have considered the request for rehearing en banc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied.

780 F.Supp.2d 1351 (2011) Constantine N. POLITES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Ad Hoc Coalition for Fair Pipe Imports from China, & The United Steelworkers, Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 11-91. Court No. 09-00387. United States Court of International Trade. July 28, 2011. *1352 Peter S. Herrick, PA (P

755 F.Supp.2d 1352 (2011) Constantine N. POLITES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and The Ad Hoc Coalition for Fair Pipe Imports from China, & The United Steel Workers, Defendant-Intervenors. Slip Op. 11-31. Court No. 09-00387. United States Court of International Trade. March 23, 2011. *1353 Peter S. Herrick, PA

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROGER W. TITUS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On July 31, 2006, relator Harold Salo-mon (“Relator”) filed a complaint in the *773District of Maryland against corporate defendants including the Louis Berger Group, Inc. (“LBG”), alleging violations of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733. ECF No. 2. Relator filed an

SUMMARY ORDER Constantine McLaughlin appeals from a judgment of conviction, dated March 14, 2006, principally sentencing McLaughlin to 10 years’ imprisonment. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the proceedings below, and the specification of issues on appeal. While McLaughlin’s challenges to the judgment of conviction are without merit, we note that the district court erred when it concluded that Mc

PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Reyna-Castanon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Reyna-Castanon has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

OPINION PER CURIAM. Appellant Kurt Figaro appeals from an order of the District Court denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10. Figaro sought relief based on Amendment 706 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which lowered the base offense level for cocaine base, or crack, offenses. The Federal Public Defender was appointed to represent him

OPINION PER CURIAM. Appellant Kurt Figaro appeals from an order of the District Court denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10. Figaro sought relief based on Amendment 706 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which lowered the base offense level for cocaine base, or crack, offenses. The Federal Public Defender was appointed to represent him