Cases

KATZMANN, Chief Judge: Defendant Thomas Cramer appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence of 360 months’ imprisonment and 15 years of supervised release, entered on February 21, 2014 by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York (Geraci, J.), following his guilty plea to four counts of sex trafficking of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(1) an

MEMORANDUM ** Douglas Lee Cramer appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Appellant argues that the district court erred on several evidentiary and trial-management rulings. We affirm. 1. Appellant argues that the trial court’s termination of defense counsel’s opening statement was an abuse of discretion and a violation of h

Order Jan Cramer pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine. 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). The only issue properly presented on appeal is whether Cramer is accountable for more than 500 grams of cocaine. The district court’s affirmative finding led to a sentence of 120 months’ imprisonment. (Cramer’s reply brief raises an additional issue, but contentions initially presented in a reply brief are forfeited, and we do not discuss

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED. Thomas Cramer appeals from an April 25, 2002 judgment and sentence entered following his guilty plea to one charge of violating the terms of supervised release. On appeal, Cramer’s sole challenge is to a special condition of supervised r

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-1465 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Grant Cramer lllllllll

ORDER SOLOMON OLIVER, JR., Chief Judge. Plaintiffs James and Sherry Cramer (“Plaintiffs” or the “Cramers”) filed this action under 26 U.S.C. § 7422 against the United States of America (“the United States”). Plaintiffs assert that the United States wrongly denied their theft loss deduction for taxable year 2007. Currently pending before the court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF

MEMORANDUM and ORDER COSTANTINO, District Judge. This is a criminal prosecution charging defendant John Cornelius Cramer with two counts of theft of men’s suits from foreign commerce in violation of 18 U.S. C. § 659 (1971). On September 17, 18, 19, 1973 a hearing was held to determine the disposition of defendant’s motion to suppress written and oral statements made by him to the police and the suits <

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Jeffrey Brüce Cramer pleaded guilty to transporting a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § '2423(a). In his plea agreement, Cramer stipulated to the application of United' States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 4B1.5(a) as a repeat and dangerous sex offender against minors. Over Cramer’s objection, the g

DECISION JAMES E. SHAPIRO, Bankruptcy Judge. This adversary proceeding presents the following question: Does Citizens Bank (“plaintiff’) hold a nondischargeable claim against the debtors, Alan and Jean Cram-er (“defendants”), pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1328(c)(1)? The plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment which is opposed by the defendants. The parties have submitted briefs.</

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-1129 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Jeffrey Bruce Cramer pleaded guilty to transporting a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.G. § 2423(a). In his plea agreement, Cramer stipulated to the application of United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 4B1.5(a) as. a repeat and dangerous sex offender against minors. Over Cramer’s

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 04-1129 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court

App. Ct. Ill., 3d Dist. Cer-­tiorari denied.

406 B.R. 267 (2009) In re Carl Joseph CRAMER Leslie Ann Cramer, Debtors. Carl Joseph Cramer, Leslie Ann Cramer, Objectors v. Indymac Bank, F.S.B., Claimant. No. 5-08-BK-51392. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. April 16, 2009. *268 Eric Lester Leinbach, Easton, PA, for Debtors. Lisa M. Doran, Doran Nowa

Ferguson, Judge (concurring in the result): I concur in the result reached in the principal opinion. I fully agree that the defilement here involved was aggravated. I disagree, however, with the implication contained in the principal opinion that because the defilement was so aggravated “the maximum sentence permissible under any of the alternative provisions of the Code and the Manual should be permitted.”

543 U.S. 947 CRAMERv.ENGLERT ET AL. No. 04-5939. Supreme Court of United States. October 18, 2004. 1 C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 93 Fed. Appx. 263.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.