Cases

MEMORANDUM** William Hughes Cravens appeals the 48-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reject Cravens’ contention that the district court erred under Federal Rule of Criminal P

Senior Judge SULLIVAN delivered the opinion of the Court. During June of 1998, appellant, an E-5, was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members at Travis Air Force Base in California. He was *371 charged with one specification of wrongfully using

ORDER Lawrence Cravens asked the district court to modify the portion of his sentence which imposed a fine. He appeals from the order which denied his motion. We affirm. On May 30, 2001, Cravens was sentenced to a term of imprisonment and a period of supervised release. The sentence included an assessment of $300 and a fine of $2000, without interest. It did not require immediate payment in full or provide a schedule

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 01-2409 United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lawrence Cravens, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 00 CR 1068--Suzanne B. Conlon, Judge. Argued November 9, 2001--Decided December 27, 2001 Before Manion, Kanne, and Rovner, Circuit Judges. Manion, Circuit Judge. I. In the 1930’s and 40’s, the notorious bank robb

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Robert Keith Cravens sought post-conviction relief on the ground that his 216-month prison sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act ("ACCA"), 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e)(1), was imposed in violation of the Constitution and in excess of th

MANION, Circuit Judge. I. In the 1930’s and 40’s, the notorious bank robber Willie Sutton, when asked why he robbed banks, simply replied, “Because that’s where the money is.” 1 Apparently Lawrence Cravens endorses this philosophy. While no Willie Sutton, Cravens does seem to crave robbing banks

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA MICHAEL COREY CRAVENS, SURVIVING SPOUSE OF SAMANTHA J. CRAVENS, DECEASED, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. MARTIN A. MONTANO JR., A SINGLE MAN; AND CASAS CUSTOM FLOOR CARE, LLC, AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Defendants. CINCINNATI INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Intervention/Appellant

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CASSANDRA CRAVENS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-01357 (CJN) PACT, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Cassandra Cravens was terminated by Defendant Pact, Inc., purportedly for failing to generate sufficient revenue in her role as a country

OPINION ON REHEARING BILL MEIER, JUSTICE Appellees George F. Cravens, M.D.; RCC Medical District Facilities, Ltd. (the *875•Partnership); and Center for Neurological Disorders Hospital, LP (CNDH) filed a motion for rehearing of our opinion that issued on October 29, 2015.. We deny the motion, withdraw our opinion and judgment dated October 29, 2015

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

ORDER Terrence W. Boyle, United States District Judge This cause comes before the Court following a hearing to review the commitment of respondent, Walter Wooden, as a sexually dangerous person pursuant to the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, 18 U.S.C. § 4248. For the reasons that follow, the Court finds that Mr. Wooden is no longer sexually dangerous and orders his release from commitm

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM; Randle Porter Cooke appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a review hearing. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

SELYA, Circuit Judge. The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act (the Act) allows the federal government to seek civil commitment of any “sexually dangerous person” already in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). See 18 U.S.C. § 4248(a). Pursuant to the Act, an individual is deemed to be sexually dangerous (and thus unfit to be safely returned to th

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

936 So.2d 538 (2005) Kassi Ray CRAVENS v. Chad Michael CRAVENS. 2040004. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. September 9, 2005. Rehearing Denied December 16, 2005. Certiorari Denied February 10, 2006. *539 Christopher G. McCary of Legal Services Alabama, Inc., Anniston, for appellant. Shann

PER CURIAM: Albert F. Iaquinta appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 4247(h) (West 2012 & Supp.2014) to determine whether he should be discharged. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials b

ORDER TERRENCE W. BOYLE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s motion to suppress any and all evidence, including any statements, obtained by law enforcement officers incident to defendant’s warrantless arrest. The government responded in opposition, and the matter is ripe for ruling. Hearings were held on this issue at Raleigh, North Carolina, on June 23, 2016, an

OPINION Restani, Judge: This matter is before the court following the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) Final Results of Remand Redetermination, ECF No. 85 (“Remand Results”). The court remanded to Commerce to apply its differential pricing (“DP”) analysis in the 2009-2010 annual antidumping duty (“AD”) admini