Cases

5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21 3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH  (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU )LOH 1DPH DS 81,7('67$7(6&28572)$33($/6 )257+(6,;7+&,5&8,7 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB 81,7(' 67$7(6 2) $0(5,&$ ; 3ODLQWLII$SSHOOHH    1R Y

63 F.3d 1112 U.S.v.Crouch* NO. 94-4099 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Aug 01, 1995 1 Appeal From: S.D.Fla., No. 93-14001-CR-KLR 2

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 93-7719 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus A. GUY CROUCH, III and MICHAEL J. FRYE, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 93-7719 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus A. GUY CROUCH, III and MICHAEL J. FRYE, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

835 F.Supp. 938 (1993) UNITED STATES of America, v. A. Guy CROUCH, III, and Michael J. Frye. Cr. No. G-92-22. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. October 18, 1993. *939 *940 Jimmy Phillips, Angleton, TX, Steven Jay Rozan, Houston, TX, for A. Guy Crouch, III. Gu

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

865 F.2d 1264 U.S.v.Crouch* NO. 88-2714 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. JAN 12, 1989 1 Appeal From: E.D.Tex. 2

666 F.Supp. 1414 (1987) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. William Fillmore CROUCH, Defendant. No. CR-87-0014 EFL. United States District Court, N.D. California. August 11, 1987. Leida Schoggen, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff. Riordan & Rosenthall, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant. ORDER RE MOTION TO SUPPRESS</

734 F.2d 22 U.S.v.Crouch 83-1136 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. 4/19/84 1 N.D.Cal. AFFIRMED

FLETCHER, Judge (dissenting): I dissent. In this case there can be no doubt that one, the facts presented did establish the appellant’s role as an aider and abettor and two, the military judge failed to correctly and adequately explain the law to him in the course of the providence inquiry. However, in the cases of United States v. Kilgore, 21 U.S.C.M.A. 35, 44 C.M.R. 89 (1971), and United States v.

478 F.Supp. 867 (1979) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. William Fillmore CROUCH, Defendant. Crim. No. S-79-157 LKK. United States District Court, E. D. California. October 26, 1979. *868 Herman Sellas, U. S. Atty., Malcolm S. Segal, Chief Asst. U. S. Atty., Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff. E. Richard Walker, Federal

570 F.2d 949 U. S.v.Crouch No. 76-2361 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 3/9/78 S.D.Tex., 566 F.2d 1311

562 F.2d 49 U. S.v.Crouch No. 77-1111 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 7/28/77 1 E.D.Va. AFFIRMED

THOMAS E. JOHNSTON, CHIEF JUDGE Before the Court are Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 182), and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 179). For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' motion, (ECF No. 182), and GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant's motion, (ECF No. 179).

537 U.S. 887 CROUCHv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-176. Supreme Court of United States. October 7, 2002. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. 2 C. A. 6

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Jerry C. Crouch appeals the sentence imposed by the district court after his conviction on charges of conspiracy to conduct an illegal gambling business, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1955; engaging in monetary transactions with criminally derived property of value greater than $10,000, in violat

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied. Reported below: 84 F. 3d 1497.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied. Same case below, 77 So. 3d 625.