⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Cruz-Ruiz”

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 350 F. App'x 625
OPINION FUENTES, Circuit Judge. Appellant Raymond Cruz-Ruiz appeals from the District Court’s sentence of 57 months imprisonment and a three year term of supervised release, contending that the Court improperly imposed a sixteen level enhancement and that the sentence was unreasonable. For the following reasons, we affirm the District Court’s judgment. I. The Distri
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 350 F. App'x 625
OPINION FUENTES, Circuit Judge. Appellant Raymond Cruz-Ruiz appeals from the District Court’s sentence of 57 months imprisonment and a three year term of supervised release, contending that the Court improperly imposed a sixteen level enhancement and that the sentence was unreasonable. For the following reasons, we affirm the District Court’s judgment. I. The Distri
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 334 F. App'x 95
MEMORANDUM ** Candido Ruiz-Cruz appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Ruiz-Cruz contends that the district court erred during the revocation hearing by improperly relying on the seriousness of the offense and the need to promote respect for the law. The record reflects that the
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 334 F. App'x 95
MEMORANDUM ** Candido Ruiz-Cruz appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Ruiz-Cruz contends that the district court erred during the revocation hearing by improperly relying on the seriousness of the offense and the need to promote respect for the law. The record reflects that the
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996-05-01 · Published · cited 113× · 82 F.3d 856; 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3030; 96 Daily Journal DAR 5042; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10002; 1996 WL 210635
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge: OVERVIEW The defendant, Maria Leticia Ruiz de Cruz, appeals her jury conviction of knowingly accepting and receiving counterfeit immigration documents as evidence of employment authorization in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDUR
United States District Court · 2019-05-28 · Published · cited 0× · 382 F. Supp. 3d 166
FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Eli Lilly and Company ("Lilly"), which is not a party here, requests that the Court enter an Order of Restitution directing defendant Martin Thuna ("Thuna") to pay Lilly $ 2,099,018.01 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sections 3663(a)(2) ("Victim and Witness Protection Act," or "VWPA"), 3664, and 3771(e)(2)(A) ("Crime Victims' Rights Act," or "CVRA"). (Docket No. 23.) The United States and Thun
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017-03-24 · Published · cited 46× · 852 F.3d 67; 41 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1706; 2017 WL 1101605; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 5235; 129 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1857
DYK, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs challenge the Office of Personnel Management’s (“OPM”) regulations that exclude cost-of-living allowances (“COLAs”) 1 from the calculation of retirement and other benefits. These COLAs are received by federal employees working in non-foreign areas located outside the contiguous United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 270 F. App'x 80
SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-Appellant Hector Cruz appeals the portion of a judgment, entered on May 11, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, that sentenced Cruz to two concurrent terms of 135 months’ imprisonment for his involvement in a conspiracy to import and distribute cocaine. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts of the case, its procedural history, and the issues on appeal.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-04-18 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 970
*970C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 976; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 977; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 693; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx. 931; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 472; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 114 Fed. Appx. 351;
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-04-18 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 970
*970C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 976; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 977; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 116 Fed. Appx. 693; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 117 Fed. Appx. 931; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 127 Fed. Appx. 472; C. A. 9th Cir. Reported below: 114 Fed. Appx. 351;
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008-01-02 · Published · cited 1× · 560 F. Supp. 2d 108; 2008 WL 2428212
(2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. RODRIGUEZ-TORRES, et al., Defendants. Criminal No. 07-302 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 2, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendant Hernan Lugo Oliveri's ("Defendant") Motion for Bill of Particulars. (Docket No. 12
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 995
*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 995
*995C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 217; C. A. 6th Cir. Reported below: 383 F. 3d 436; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 125 Fed. Appx. 981; C. A. 11th Cir. Reported below: 126 Fed. Appx. 462; C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 115 Fed. Appx. 246; C. A. 7th Cir. Reported below: 388 F. 3d 1104;
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-11-25 · Published · cited 5× · 350 F.3d 1216; 2003 WL 22781306
MICHEL, Circuit Judge. This suit was brought by certain present and former United States Border Patrol agents, alleging that the government wrongly and willfully failed to pay the plaintiffs overtime wages at a time-and-a-half rate as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a). The government conceded that the plaintiffs had not been paid for overtime, but contended that all of the various position
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 544 U.S. 996; 125 S. Ct. 1952
544 U.S. 996 CHACON-AVITIAv.UNITED STATESCONEJO-CANOv.UNITED STATESGALLEGOS-LUERA, AKA TORRES-MONSISVAISv.UNITED STATESGONZALEZ-BARRAZAv.UNITED STATESGONZALEZ-CALDERONv.UNITED STATESGRANADOS-VASQUEZv.UNITED STATESMARTINEZ-MORALES, AKA MALDONADO, AKA MARTINEZv.UNITED STATESMUNOZ-MARQUEZv.UNITED STATESONTIVEROS, AKA SAUCEDO-ONTIVEROSv.UNITED STATES
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003-11-25 · Published · cited 23× · 350 F.3d 1216; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23944
350 F.3d 1216 Rowdy D. ADAMS, Ricardo E. Aguirre, Sheri L. Althoff, Luis R. Alvarado, Luis A. Amavizca, Paul H. Ammerman, Paul A. Anderson, Jaime M. Arras, Larry G. Arthurs, Larry H. Arthurs, Martha I. Arvizu, James R. Ash, David J. Astle, John T. Attanasio, Meri L. Axberg, Albert Bailey, Jr., Robert V. Bakowski, Donald L. Barley, John C. Bates, James W. Baumann, Paul A. Beeson, James S. Bendorf, David P. Bennett, Frank J. Beverly, William L. Black
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2001-11-14 · Published · cited 1× · 175 F. Supp. 2d 129; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19316; 2001 WL 1481441
175 F.Supp.2d 129 (2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. [05] Martires Paulino CASTRO, [08] Esteban Martinez García, [23] Carlos Valdes, Defendants Criminal No. 00-0693(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 14, 2001. *130 Miriam R. Ramos-Grateroles, San Juan, for Rafael Reynoso-De-La-Cruz. Marl
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 999; 124 S. Ct. 507; 72 U.S.L.W. 3308; 157 L. Ed. 2d 403; 2003 U.S. LEXIS 7966
*999(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-11-03 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 999
*999(Reported below: 73 Fed. Appx. 83); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 82); (73 Fed. Appx. 81); (73 Fed. Appx
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-01-12 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1130; 157 L. Ed. 2d 933; 72 U.S.L.W. 3448; 124 S. Ct. 1103; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 452
(Reported below: 71 Fed. Appx. 384); (72 Fed. Appx. 957); (71 Fed. Appx. 437); (72 Fed. Appx. 971); (72 Fed. Appx. 962); (74 Fed. Appx. 357); (73 Fed. Appx. 75); (71 Fed. Appx. 397); (72 Fed. Appx. 955); (72 Fed. Appx. 961); (72 Fed. Appx. 960); (72 Fed. Appx. 954);