Cases

McKAY, Circuit Judge. As a black Lexus whizzed eastbound along 1-70, swerving in and out of its lane, Sergeant Schneider of the Russell County-Sheriffs office pulled over the speeding car. Upon approaching the Lexus, Sergeant Schneider found the driver, Ms. Zhang, and a male passenger later identified as Mr. Chen who was sitting in the rear passenger seat.

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-2495 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHARLES CUI, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

OPINION PER CURIAM. Guangile Cui seeks review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). For the following reasons, we will deny his petition for review. I. Cui, a citizen of China, arrived in the United States in June 1998. Ten yea

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioners Cui Ying Yang and Yun Jin Lian, natives and citizens of the People’s Republic of China, seek review of a May 5, 2008 order of the BIA, which denied their motion to reopen. In re Cui Ying Yang, Yun Jin Lian, Nos. A97 849 570, A73 577 705 (B.I.A. May 5, 2008). We assume the *36parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. Song Zhu Cui, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a November 30, 2012 decision of the BIA affirming the May 5, 2011 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) George T.

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Cui Yan Chen, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a March 28, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the July 3, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Thomas J. Mulligan, denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Cui Yan Chen, No. A 95 710 125 (B.I.A. Mar. 28, 2008), aff'g

*363SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is denied and the decision of the BIA be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Cui Hua Chen and Hong Fei Lin, through counsel, petition for review of the BIA decision affirming t

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Mei Zi Cui, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of the November 25, 2008 order of the BIA, which denied her motion to reopen. In re Mei Zi Cui, No. A098 903 223 (B.I.A. Nov. 25, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioners Cui Ying Yang and Yun Jin Lian, natives and citizens of the People’s Republic of China, seek review of a May 5, 2008 order of the BIA, which denied their motion to reopen. In re Cui Ying Yang, Yun Jin Lian, Nos. A97 849 570, A73 577 705 (B.I.A. May 5, 2008). We assume the *36parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural

543 U.S. 812 URENECKv.PING CUI. No. 03-1560. Supreme Court of United States. October 4, 2004. 1 App. Ct. Mass. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 59 Mass. App. 809, 798 N. E. 2d 305.

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Mei Zi Cui, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of the November 25, 2008 order of the BIA, which denied her motion to reopen. In re Mei Zi Cui, No. A098 903 223 (B.I.A. Nov. 25, 2008). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of the case. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Cui Yan Chen, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a March 28, 2008 order of the BIA affirming the July 3, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Thomas J. Mulligan, denying her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Cui Yan Chen, No. A 95 710 125 (B.I.A. Mar. 28, 2008), aff'g

SUMMARY ORDER Mei Zi Cui, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a May 24, 2007 order of the BIA affirming the December 13, 2005 decision of Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Brigitte Laforest, denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Mei Zi Cui, No. A98 903 223 (B.I.A. May 24, 2007), aff'g No. A98 903 2

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming a 6 decision by Immigration Judge (“IJ”) Philip J. Montante denying petitioner’s motion to reopen removal proceedings after a removal order was entered in absentia. See In re Taizhu Cui, No. A 78 386 167 (B.I.A. Aug. 25, 2004), aff'g No. A 78 386 167 (Immig. Ct. Buffalo Aug. 13, 2003). We assume the parties’ famili

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yi Cui Sun (A78-858-620), through counsel, petitions for review of the July 2004 order of the BIA summarily dismissing her appeal from the decision of Immigration Judge Roxanne C. Hladylowycz (the “IJ”), which denied her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history, wh

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Cui.Zhen Wu, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a January 27, 2006 order of the BIA affirming the August 10, 2005 order of the Immigration Judge denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. See In re Cui Zhen Wu, No. A 77 308 954 (B.I.A. Jan. 27, 2006), affg No.77 308 954 (Immig.Ct.N.Y.City, Aug. 10, 2005). On appeal, Wu argues that (1) the BIA erred in

OPINION CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: Jie Cui, a native of China, seeks asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Cui claims that he has been, and will be, persecuted because of his practice of Da Zang Gong (“DZ Gong”). The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) and Board of Immigra

SUMMARY ORDER Petitioner Yi Cui Sun (A78-858-620), through counsel, petitions for review of the July 2004 order of the BIA summarily dismissing her appeal from the decision of Immigration Judge Roxanne C. Hladylowycz (the “IJ”), which denied her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history, wh

SUMMARY ORDER Cui Ying Yang and Yun Jin Lian, natives and citizens of China, seek review of a March 16, 2006 order of the BIA adopting and affirming the September 30, 2004 decision of immigration judge (“IJ”) Barbara Nelson denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. In re Cui Ying Yang, Yun Jin Lian, Nos. A97 849 570, A73 577 705 (B.I.A. March 16, 2006), a

OPINION PER CURIAM. Petitioner, Cui Ying Zhan, has filed a motion for a stay of removal and a petition for review from the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen. The government has filed a motion for summary action. For the reasons that follow, we will summarily deny the petition for review. See Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. P