Cases

104 F.3d 369 U.S.v.Dorval* NO. 94-6719 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Dec 17, 1996 Appeal From: S.D.Ala. , No. 94-00004-CR 1 AFFIRMED.

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

541 U.S. 1070 DORVALv.UNITED STATES. No. 03-9968. Supreme Court of United States. May 24, 2004. 1 C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

545 F.3d 750 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Geoffrey David McCALLA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-50162. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. *751 Submitted July 15, 2008.[*] Filed September 24, 2008. Shannon M. Dorvall, Santa Monica, CA, on behalf of defendant-appella

THAYER, J. The defendant, Charles Dorval, Jr., appeals his first degree murder conviction. See RSA 630:l-a, 1(b)(2) (1996). He contends that the Superior Court (Hollman, J.) erred by: (1) not suppressing statements he made to an informant after invoking his Miranda rights; and (2) excluding certain statements as hearsay. We affirm. The parties agree to the following facts. Two elder

Dorval v. NHSP Warden CV-01-26-B 10/09/01 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Charles Dorval, Jr. v. Civil No. 01-026-B Opinion No. 2001DNH184 Warden, New Hampshire State Prison MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Charles Dorval, Jr., is currently serving a sentence of life without parole in the New Hampshir

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 07-50162 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No. CR-06-00384-DSF-1 GEOFFREY DAVID MCCALLA, OPINION Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. This complex criminal case involves allegations of racketeering, conspiracy, arson, mail fraud, and money laundering against various Defendants. Presently before the Court are motions by Defendant Saverio Galasso III to (i) sever his trial from his Co-Defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 14; (ii) to strike portions of the indictment pursuant to Fe

PER CURIAM: William MacAllister appeals his conviction for conspiracy to export cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963. We affirm. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND William MacAllister, a resident of Montréal, Québec, was a member of a conspiracy to export cocaine from the United States. In June 1992, MacAllister’s coconspirator and codefendant, Paul LaRue, was introduced by telephone to Drug

PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED No. 97-2144 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 97-2144. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William MacALLISTER, Defendant-Appellant. Nov. 16, 1998. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Fl

904 F.Supp. 235 (1995) UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. Joseph GIAMPA, Gennaro Vittorio, a/k/a "Gerry Giampa," Joseph Gaito, James McManus, Benjamin Segarra, Elliot Porco and John Capra, a/k/a "Johnny Hooks," Defendants. Crim. A. No. 94-403 (AJL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. August 17, 1995. *236

Opinion Musgrave, Senior Judge: This action is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment pursuant to CIT R. 56. Plaintiff, Innotech Aviation, Ltd. (“Innotech”), contests the denial by the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) of a protest seeking duty-free entry of a civil aircraft engine. *1393Backgrou

639 F.Supp. 629 (1986) UNITED STATES of America, v. Juan HERNANDEZ, Defendant. No. 85 Cr. 728. United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 7, 1986. *630 Reena Raggi, U.S. Atty., E.D.N.Y., Brooklyn, N.Y. by Thomas H. Roche, Asst. U.S. Atty., for U.S. Gerald B. Lefcourt, P.C., New York City by Gerald B. Lefcourt, Joshu

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: Three appellants are before us as a result of their convictions arising from their involvement' over several years in the illegal distribution of a huge amount of drugs by forged prescriptions. After the jury returned a guilty verdict on a multicount indictment against one of the appellants, the trial court set aside the verdict as to one count, which prompted the government’s appeal. The resolution o

763 F.2d 518 18 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 221 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee,v.Charles JONES, a/k/a "Coffee", Marshall J. Muhammad, a/k/a"Marshall Jones", Raymond Piacente,Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants. Nos. 605, 454, 515 and 516, Dockets 84-1230 and 84-1258 to 84-1260. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit.

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge. Allen Lamers of Lamers Bus Lines, Inc. brought this action on behalf of the United States under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b). He alleged that in order to remain eligible for annual federal transit grants the City of Green Bay lied to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) about it