⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Daniel Lee”

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015-07-13 · Published · cited 31× · 792 F.3d 1021; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12009; 2015 WL 4173773
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Daniel Lewis Lee appeals the district court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion seeking relief from the final judgment entered in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas petition. In his initial habeas petition, Lee had asserted that his trial counsel was ineffective, but he failed to attach any evidence to support that claim. The petition was denied, and Lee subseque
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014-07-29 · Published · cited 2× · 760 F.3d 692; 2014 WL 3715074; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 14607
POSNER, Circuit Judge. The defendant was convicted by a jury of having committed, along with another man, four drug-related robberies of pharmacies in Milwaukee, and also of having used a firearm in connection with the robberies and having possessed a controlled substance with intent to distribute it. He was sentenced to 780 months in prison. He represented himself at trial and
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013-04-29 · Published · cited 0× · 715 F.3d 215; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8928; 2013 WL 1788549
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Daniel Lewis Lee and codefendant Chevie Kehoe were convicted of conspiring to violate and violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statute, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c)-(d), and of three murders in aid of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1959. The government sought the death penalty for both Lee and Kehoe, but only Lee received a
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005-02-02 · Published · cited 280× · 397 F.3d 95; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1651; 2005 WL 237200
JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. This sentencing appeal challenges a two-year term of imprisonment imposed for violation of supervised release. The sentence was imposed before the decision of the Supreme Court in United States v. Booker, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) (“Boolcer/Fanfan”). The appeal presents the issues of whether the District Cou
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020-06-01 · Published · cited 2× · 960 F.3d 1023
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-3618 ___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. Daniel Lewis Lee, also known as Danny Lee, also known as D. L. Graham, al
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993-08-23 · Published · cited 27× · 1 F.3d 733; 72 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5726; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 21168; 1993 WL 316040
PER CURIAM. Daniel Lee Watson appeals his conviction on nineteen counts of aiding and assisting the preparation of false income tax returns. We affirm. A grand jury returned a twenty-count indictment against Watson, a certified public accountant, charging him with willfully aiding, assisting, and advising in the preparation of United States Individual Income Tax Re
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993-01-22 · Published · cited 57× · 984 F.2d 1087; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 988; 1993 WL 9782
BRORBY, Circuit Judge. The Government appeals the district court’s sua sponte dismissal with prejudice of the information filed against Daniel Lee Saltzman. The district court concluded the seven-month time period between Saltz-man’s arrest and filing of the information constituted a violation of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174 (1985). The issu
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017-05-25 · Published · cited 0× · 568 B.R. 162
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Melvin S. Hoffman, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge In this adversary proceeding, the plaintiff, Vera Lee, a creditor of the defendant, Jane Daniel, the debtor in the main case, has moved for summary judgment on all counts of her four-count complaint. Ms. Lee seeks a judgment that the debt owed to her by Ms. Daniel be excepted from discharge under
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987-05-18 · Published · cited 108× · 818 F.2d 1052; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6432
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: On this appeal we are called upon to decide for the first time whether there should be a burden of proof established— and, if so, what burden — for disputed allegations in presentence reports. This is a matter of some significance since the great majority of defendants plead guilty and are sentenced based upon information contained in such reports. To decide these questions we must take into accou
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019-07-31 · Published · cited 337× · 932 F.3d 242
BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge: This case involves the prosecution of several members of a violent street gang known as the Double Nine Goon Syndikate (DNGS). After a multi-week trial, a jury convicted Halisi Uhuru (Halisi), Anthony Stokes (Stokes), Kweli Uhuru (Kweli), Mersadies Shelton (Mersadies), Shantai Shelton (Shantai), and Daniel Mathis (Mathis) (collectively, the defend
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975-12-18 · Published · cited 5× · 527 F.2d 508; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11395
PER CURIAM. Daniel Lee Sappington was convicted of possession of funds stolen from a federally insured savings and loan institution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(c) on October 9, 1968. He appealed that conviction, but pursuant to his motion the appeal was dismissed on June 5, 1969. Long after the time for appeal had run Sappington moved to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-04-17 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 1577; 197 L. Ed. 2d 704; 85 U.S.L.W. 3490; 2017 WL 1366729; 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2491
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2017-04-17 · Published · cited 0× · 137 S. Ct. 1603; 197 L. Ed. 2d 729; 85 U.S.L.W. 3491; 2017 WL 959851; 2017 U.S. LEXIS 2594
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003-12-08 · Published · cited 10× · 351 F.3d 350; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 24610; 2003 WL 22880792
*351 RILEY, Circuit Judge. Ryan Daniel Lee (Lee) appeals Ms sentence for possession of an unregistered sawed-off shotgun in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d) (2000). The Presentence Report recommended a two-level enhancement pursuant to section 2K2.1(b)(3) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 02-2389 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the E
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003-12-08 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-1313 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-12-10 · Published · cited 23× · 808 F.3d 226; 2015 WL 8479810
Reversed by published opinion. Senior Judge HAMILTON wrote the opinion, in which Judge AGEE and Judge WYNN joined. HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge: On appeal, Daniel Blue (Blue) challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions on a single count of possession with intent to distribute 100 grams or more of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 811 F.3d 272; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 21616; 2015 WL 9301424
ORDER The petition for rehearing by the panel is denied. Judge Kelly dissents from the denial of the petition for rehearing by the panel. KELLY, Circuit Judge, dissenting from the denial of panel rehearing. I respectfully dissent from the denial of Lee’s petition for rehearing by the panel, because the petition — and the recent Seventh Circuit decision it brings to our attention — provide
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001-12-14 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-1975 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-04-20 · Published · cited 0× · 135 S. Ct. 1869; 191 L. Ed. 2d 742; 83 U.S.L.W. 3801; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 2798
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.