⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “United States v. Darst”

District Court, D. Kansas · 1989-11-15 · Published · cited 3× · 726 F. Supp. 286; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14553; 1989 WL 147776
726 F.Supp. 286 (1989) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Billy J. DARST, Defendant. No. 89-10041-01. United States District Court, D. Kansas. November 15, 1989. Billy Joe Darst, Little River, Kan., pro se. Thomas D. Arnhold, Hutchinson, Kan. (on appeal) for defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CROW, District Judge. The case com
Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999-09-27 · Published · cited 17× · 716 N.E.2d 579; 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 1694; 1999 WL 756946
OPINION SULLIVAN, Judge Appellant, Richard L. Darst, United States Bankruptcy Trustee (Trustee), appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Illinois Farmers Insurance Company (Illinois Farmers) upon Bert and Lavonna Sloans’ claims for fraud and breach of an assumed duty to provide accurate information.1 We affirm. On
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005-08-08 · Published · cited 7× · 417 F.3d 898; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16425
417 F.3d 898 DARST-WEBBE TENANT ASSOCIATION BOARD, a Missouri non-profit corporation; Housing Comes First, a Missouri non-profit corporation; Peabody Tenant Association, a Missouri non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ST. LOUIS HOUSING AUTHORITY, a Municipal corporation; Cheryl A. Lovell, in her official capacity as Director of the St. Louis Housing Authority; United States Department of Housing and Urban Development; Mel Martine
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005-08-08 · Published · cited 1× · 417 F.3d 898
MELLOY, Circuit Judge. On remand following partial summary-judgment, a bench trial, and a prior appeal, the distinct court 1 found in favor of the defendants on six claims that relate to alleged discrimination in housing. We affirm. I. Background Plaintiffs-Appellants Darsb-
Darst v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013-07-16 · Published · cited 19× · 323 Ga. App. 614; 746 S.E.2d 865; 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 2701; 2013 Ga. App. LEXIS 684; 2013 WL 3652026
ELLINGTON, Presiding Judge. A Gwinnett County jury found Roger Darst guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of four counts of aggravated child molestation, OCGA § 16-6-4 (c). He appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial, contending that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to obtain certain records concerning the victims, present expert witness testimony, and object to certain testimony. He also con
Givens v. Darstpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011-06-20 · Published · cited 9× · 800 N.W.2d 652
OPINION ROSS, Judge. Anthony Darst, father, appeals from the district court’s order granting substantial visitation rights to his son’s maternal grandmother, Roxanne Givens, following the murder of the child’s mother. The district court granted Givens visitation every Tuesday and Thursday afternoon and every other weekend extended from Friday evening through Sunday evening. The district court’s visitation or
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003-08-08 · Published · cited 2× · 339 F.3d 702
MELLOY, Circuit Judge. Appellants, Darst-Webbe Tenant Association Board, Peabody Tenant Association, and Housing Comes First, Inc., brought this action against the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and the St. Louis Housing Authority (“SLHA”). This suit was intended to address grievances arising out of the implementation of revitalization plans for
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 493 U.S. 853; 110 S. Ct. 155
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-10-02 · Published · cited 0× · 493 U.S. 853
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009-10-27 · Published · cited 2× · 982 A.2d 27; 410 N.J. Super. 314
982 A.2d 27 (2009) 410 N.J. Super. 314 Carl and Della DARST, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BLAIRSTOWN TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Defendant-Respondent. DOCKET NO. A-5501-06T2. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 23, 2009. Decided October 27, 2009. *28 Ri
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2016-05-10 · Published · cited 7× · 126 Fed. Cl. 328; 2016 U.S. Claims LEXIS 504; 2016 WL 2764330
Pre-Award Bid Protest; Corrective Action; 48 C.F.R. § 8.406; Injunctive Relief; Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act, 10 U.S:C. § 2S04c(e); Organizational Conflicts of Interest; Unequal Treatment. OPINION HORN, J. FINDINGS OF FACT Protestor, PrieewaterhouseCoopers Public Sector,
Darst v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002-03-28 · Published · cited 3× · 816 So. 2d 680; 2002 WL 463441
816 So.2d 680 (2002) Steven DARST, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Nos. 5D00-2262, 5D00-2459. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. March 28, 2002. *681 James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Linda L. Gaustad, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant/Cross-Appe
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008-01-11 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 04-2460 RICHARD L. DARST, as Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of KRZYSZTOF CHALIMONIUK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION and TONIA GORDON, Defendants-Appellees. ____
Darst v. Rhaypublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1966-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 384 U.S. 1008
Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008-01-11 · Published · cited 223× · 512 F.3d 903; 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 265; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 489; 2008 WL 108764
512 F.3d 903 (2008) Richard L. DARST, as Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Krzysztof Chalimoniuk, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERSTATE BRANDS CORPORATION and Tonia Gordon, Defendants-Appellees. No. 04-2460. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued March 28, 2007. Decided January 11, 2008. *904 Bre
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999-04-12 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 98-3110EM _____________ James E. Darst, * * Appellant. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. *
District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2004-01-06 · Published · cited 0× · 299 F. Supp. 2d 952; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 302; 2004 WL 97624
299 F.Supp.2d 952 (2004) DARST-WEBBE TENANT ASSOCIATION BOARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ST. LOUIS HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al., Defendants. No. 4:99CV354SNL. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. January 6, 2004. *953 *954 Ann B. Lever, Daniel K. Glazier, Laura V. Brink, Su
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2003-06-09 · Published · cited 2× · 56 Fed. Cl. 588; 2003 U.S. Claims LEXIS 149; 2003 WL 21437157
ORDER REMANDING TO AGENCY FIRESTONE, Judge. This case concerns a pre-award bid protest filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(4). The plaintiff, Nutech Laundry & Textile, Inc. (“Nutech”), objects to the denial of award and withdrawal of Request for Proposal (“RFP” or “solicitation”) No. CC-02-07. The RFP was for laundry services at the Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center for the Department of Health and Hu
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999-04-12 · Published · cited 4× · 172 F.3d 1065; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 6654; 1999 WL 222618
STROM, District Judge. James Darst appeals from the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of the Social Security Administration on is Privacy Act claim. After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the decision of the district court. I.
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013-07-16 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DIVISION PHIPPS, C. J., ELLINGTON, P. J., and BRANCH, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ July 16