Cases

PER CURIAM: Dawood Momeni traveled to Hawaii on eight occasions between February, 1986 and November, 1987, and charged his hotel and miscellaneous expenses to credit cards not owned by him. He appeals his conviction and sentence on multiple counts of mail, wire and credit fraud. I Momeni argues there was insufficient evidence he

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist., Div. 2. Certiorari denied.

PIERCE, Circuit Judge: Mohammad Dawood Nusraty appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Dearie, Judge, convicting him, after a jury trial, of 1) conspiring to possess heroin with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B)(i), 846; 2) importing heroin into the United States, or aiding and

WINTER, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a denial of a pro se motion for a correction of sentence pur *38 suant to former Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a). A question exists as to the timeliness of this appeal. We do not address this question because we treat appellant’s motion as having

EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge: A jury in the Middle District of Florida convicted Fernando Nino, Gabriel Nino, Na-jah Dawood Konja, Issam Hermiz, Hector Alvarez, and Basil Mezy of one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, three counts of interstate travel with the intent to promote and facilitate the conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 195

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge: On this appeal we consider whether certain statements were properly excluded as hearsay in the course of a criminal trial. The hearsay rule and its exceptions — set forth in Article VIII of the Federal Rules of Evidence — pose semantic subtleties for a trial court that must rule promptly, but which an appellate court may unhurriedly decipher. Although not

732 F.2d 153 Dawood-Haiov.I.N.S. 83-3787 United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit. 3/16/84 1 I.N.S. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED

GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge. We are a nation of immigrants, and immigrant stories. And Ubaidullah Abdulrashid Radiowala's story has the makings of a compelling one. He entered the United States on a visitor's visa in April of 1998, with his wife and two children. He testified that he started out supporting a family of four on $300 a week, while living in a residence with two other fam

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge. This case is before us on a petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying a motion to recon *91 sider an earlier refusal to grant petitioner asylum as a “refugee.” We shall grant the petition

MERRITT, Circuit Judge, concurring. I concur separately to note that even if the presumption based on past persecution has been rebutted, petitioner still has a well-founded fear of persecution based on current conditions in Iraq. He has submitted several newspaper articles from the time period of the hearing (October 2004) demonstrating worsening conditions for Christians in Iraq since the regime change in

751 F.Supp. 40 (1990) UNITED STATES of America v. Ana Lenor FEIJOO-TOMALA, Defendant. No. 89 CR 795. United States District Court, E.D. New York. November 16, 1990. *41 Andrew J. Maloney, U.S. Atty., E.D. N.Y., Brooklyn, N.Y. for U.S.; Miriam Best, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel. Robert M. Baum, Federal Defender Services Uni

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge. John Doe, 1 a student from the People’s Republic of China, appeals from a decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) finding him ineligible for asylum and ordering him deported. Mr. Doe was converted to Christianity after his arrival in this country, and in the course

273 U.S. 337 (1927) UNITED STATES v. BURTON COAL COMPANY. No. 100. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 10, 1927. Decided February 21, 1927. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *338 Assistant Attorney General Galloway, with whom Solicitor General Mitchell was on the brief, for the United Stat

63 Cal.Rptr.3d 50 (2007) 41 Cal.4th 929 162 P.3d 569 VIVA! INTERNATIONAL VOICE FOR ANIMALS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ADIDAS PROMOTIONAL RETAIL OPERATIONS, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S140064. Supreme Court of California. July 23, 2007. *51 Eisenberg, Ra

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AHMED ZAKI DAWOOD AL-HADDAD, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-cv-674 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 7

19-3133 Alzokari v. Pompeo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2019 (Argued: April 24, 2020 | Decided: August 26, 2020) Docket No. 19-3133 AHMED ALI ALZOKARI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 21-1575 ______ CHERYL BOROWSKI, Esq., Appellant v. KEAN UNIVERSITY; DAWOOD FARAHI; CHARLES WILLIAMS; STEVEN KUBOW; KENNETH GREEN, Esq.; FARAQUE CHOWDHURY; CHRISTOPHER MYERS ____________ On Appeal from the Unit

647 F.3d 626 (2011) Almas ABRAHAM, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. No. 10-2256. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Submitted January 19, 2011.[1] Decided June 1, 2011. *627 Edwin T. Gania (submitted), Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Petiti

ENTRY Mark J. Dinsmore, United States Magistrate Judge This matter comes before the Court at the intersection of the modem complexities of international relations and the “ancient civil remedy” of replevin.1 The dispositive issue in this case is this: does the federal regulation prohibiting investments in Iran preclude Plaintiffs action to recover the proceeds from such an inve

488 F.Supp.2d 965 (2007) Eugelio ARCILLA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiff, v. ADIDAS PROMOTIONAL RETAIL OPERATIONS, INC., Defendants. No. CV07-0211GAF (SHX). United States District Court, C.D. California. May 4, 2007. *966 *967 Ira Spiro, James Mark Moore,