Cases

431 F.Supp.2d 200 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff v. (1) Felipe LOPEZ-DE LA CRUZ, Defendant. No. CR. 06-063(PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 4, 2006. *201 Jorge L. Armenteros-Chervoni, San Juan, PR, or Felipe Lopez-De-La-Cruz (1), Defendant. G. Andrew Massucco-LaTaif, United States Attorney

Petition for writ of certio-rari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

544 U.S. 1014 DE LA CRUZ-GONZALEZv.UNITED STATESLOPEZ-CRUZv.UNITED STATESARAGUZ-RAMIREZv.UNITED STATESCANTU-RIOSv.UNITED STATESCASTILLO-BUSTAMANTE, AKA GARCIAv.UNITED STATESMENDOZA-SIFUENTESv.UNITED STATESTORRES-AVILAv.UNITED STATESHERNANDEZ-GONZALEZv.UNITED STATESVELA-SALINASv.UNITED STATESNIEVES-ALVAREZv.UNITED STATESRAMIREZ-SAN

SELYA, Circuit Judge. In this criminal appeal, the appellant strives to convince us that we ought to overturn his convictions for theft of public money, use of a falsely obtained social security number, and aggravated identity theft. We are not persuaded: neither the appellant’s quest for suppression of evidence nor his challenge to the district court’s jury instructions has merit,

OPINION AND ORDER FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On September 27, 2012, a federal grand jury returned an indictment charging defendant Cecilio Mercedes-De La Cruz (“Mercedes”) and his co-defendants, José Miguel Guzman-De Los Santos (“Guzman”) and Victor Manuel Carela (“Care-la”), with conspiring to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C.

Jimmie V. Reyna, Circuit Judge Defendant Juan De la Cruz Bravo-Morante was indicted on charges of illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. On August 3, 2018, Defendant pleaded guilty to the charge. Defendant now requests this court to grant his Motion to Withdraw the Guilty Plea, Motio

EBEL, Circuit Judge. In this direct criminal appeal, Defendant-Appellant Enrique De La Cruz challenges the district court’s decision to deny his motion to suppress evidence the United States obtained during an investigative seizure. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we REVERSE the denial of De La Cruz’s suppression motion. I. BACKGROUND The evidence presented at the suppr

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, District Judge. Before the Court is Petitioner Juan DeLa-Cruz’s writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 filed on March 19, 2009 (Docket No. 1). The Government opposed Petitioner’s motion on August 3, 2009 (Docket No. 7) and Petitioner filed a reply on August 27, 2009 (Docket No. 8). On March 19, 2009, Petitioner filed the instant co

OPINION AND ORDER CEREZO, District Judge. The Court has before it motions for judgment of acquittal made by both defendants at the close of the evidence offered by the government under Rule 29(a), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The two defendants are charged with violating 8 U.S.C. Section 1324(a)(1)(B) which provides that: Any person who—

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSE MARIA ZUNIGA DE LA No. 21-352 CRUZ, Agency No. A215-674-691 Petitioner, v. OPINION MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of a

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-1621 DAVID BERNARDO-DE LA CRUZ, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent. ____________________ Petition

613 F.3d 18 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Natanael DE LA PAZ-RENTAS, a/k/a Nato, Defendant, Appellant. *19 United States of America, Appellee, v. Victor Sanjurjo-Nunez, Defendant, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Pedro Molina-Bonilla, Defendant, Appellant. United States of America, Appellee, v. Waldemar Torres-Gonzalez, a/k/a Waldy, Defendan

601 F.3d 1202 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexis DE LA CRUZ SUAREZ, a.k.a. Alexis de la Cruz, Ramon Barrabi-Puentes, a.k.a. Ramon Barrabi, Defendants-Appellants. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Vazquez, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 08-13675, 08-13808. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. March 31, 2010.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1421 ALEJANDRA MILAGROS DE LA CRUZ-QUISPE, Petitioner, v. PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT GABRIEL TOLEDO DE LA CRUZ, Appellant, v. MAYRA ELIUTH PEREZ GARCIA, Appellee. No. 4D2024-0823 [December 4, 2024] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jose A

YOUNG, D.J.1 *266I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Javier Cotto López ("Cotto")2 seeks to amend his complaint against his union, defendant Unión de Trabajadores de la Industria Eléctrica y Riego (the "Union"). See Compl., ECF No. 1; Am. Compl. ("Proposed Am. Comp

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-23-00093-CR The STATE of Texas, Appellant v. Marcos Hingino RAMOS DE LA CRUZ,

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.